Jump to content

Wikipedia:Templates for discussion/Log/2010 February 26

From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

February 26

[edit]
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:43, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:I See Stars (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Not enough content for a template. Why do so many users think that EVERY FREAKING BAND needs a template even with only two or three articles? Are templates just that cool or something? Come on. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many ottersOne batOne hammer) 23:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:46, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route TUO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J. Rschen7754 22:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:47, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route TUL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J. Rschen7754 22:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:48, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route STA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J. Rschen7754 22:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:50, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route SLO (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone G. Rschen7754 22:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route SJ (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J. Rschen7754 22:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route SBT (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J or California County Routes in zone E. Rschen7754 22:49, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route SAC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J or California County Routes in zone E. Rschen7754 22:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:52, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route MPA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J. Rschen7754 22:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route MON (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone G. Rschen7754 22:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route MER (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J. Rschen7754 22:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route LA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone N. Rschen7754 22:48, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 03:58, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route INY (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J. Rschen7754 22:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route FRE (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J. Rschen7754 22:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route DN (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

None of these articles exist, and if they did they should be merged to California County Routes in zone D. Rschen7754 22:47, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route CC (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J. Rschen7754 22:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route CAL (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J or California County Routes in zone E. Rschen7754 22:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. RL0919 (talk) 04:01, 6 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:California County Route ALA (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

All links redirect to California County Routes in zone J. Rschen7754 22:46, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:14, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jeff Wadlow (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates two films —Justin (koavf)TCM21:37, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:16, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Scott Frank (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates one film. —Justin (koavf)TCM21:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Delete. עוד מישהו Od Mishehu 16:18, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Peter Sollett (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates two films —Justin (koavf)TCM21:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Oren Rudavsky (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates two films —Justin (koavf)TCM21:35, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Keep-- So? DRosenbach (Talk | Contribs) 19:55, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
Comment So... it's not useful for navigation. What is the point in a template that navigates two articles? —Justin (koavf)TCM20:36, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete per nom - not enough articles to justify a navigational template. Robofish (talk) 03:22, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
  • Delete. Not enough articles to justify a navbox. Looks like he has some other films that might be notable, so it should be fine to recreate the navbox in the future if/when there are enough articles (at least four; five or more would be best to avoid another TFD nomination). --RL0919 (talk) 23:46, 2 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Bennett Miller (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates two films. —Justin (koavf)TCM21:26, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Jonathan Levine (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates two films. —Justin (koavf)TCM21:23, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Fraser Clarke Heston (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates three films and most recent was 15 years ago. —Justin (koavf)TCM21:18, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ethan Hawke (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates two films. —Justin (koavf)TCM21:17, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Ed Harris (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates two films. —Justin (koavf)TCM21:17, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Sandi Simcha DuBowski Films (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates two films (one of them as producer.) —Justin (koavf)TCM21:09, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Daniel Barnz (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates two films. —Justin (koavf)TCM21:00, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was delete Plastikspork ―Œ(talk) 22:22, 8 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Brian Herzlinger (talk · history · transclusions · logs · subpages)

Only navigates two films —Justin (koavf)TCM20:54, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.
The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the template below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.

The result of the discussion was Redirect {{Tooltip}} to {{Abbr}}. There is no evidence of a desire to delete these beyond the nominator, but also no doubt of a huge overlap in the function of the two templates. That said, the use of hover text in articles is deprecated in Wikipedia:Accessibility, so I am going to add a caution in the template documentation to remind users of the accessibility issue. RL0919 (talk) 18:08, 5 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed this template while searching an article for the subject′s native Japanese name, which I intended to copy and paste into another medium. However, somebody had moved this info to a hidden dimension known as tool-tip. I had no problem finding the tool-tips in question (once I knew what was up, by checking the page history) but I noticed the font-size for these floaters does not follow that of normal text, and as such they are a grave impediment to reading Kanji.

More to my immediate despair I was unable to select it using the cursor on the article page, only by going to the editing window. Yet suppose I had a physical disability, or had been reading from printed copy, or navigating by keyboard only (with my lappy perhaps) or using a web-browser which does not support tool-tips?

Also see Wikipedia:Accessibility, in particular “Don't use techniques that require physical action to provide information, such as tooltips or any other "hover" text”.

I′ll ask for a consensus to delete this template on general principle. Failing that I demand we restrict its use to common short words of Basic Latin and minimize the adverse practical impact of it. ―AoV² 15:59, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

  • Redirect/Merge to {{abbr}}. The title attribute is standards complainant and accessible HTML4/5 attribute. Screen reading will read this aloud sometimes. If you have trouble reading the text, adjust the font size in Display Properties in Windows' control panel. — Dispenser 18:20, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
A couple of points:
I didn′t say anything about HTML standards compliance, or about screen-readers, or MS Windows so I don′t think your rebuttals are terribly germane. Let me re-iterate:
The “tool-tip” provides no way to select the floater-contents using the cursor. From the reader′s perspective, this is nearly as problematic as using bit-map images in place of “foreign” text.
More generally if the reader doesn′t have a mouse handy he or she wouldn′t be able to hover the cursor over the hidden message.
Even assuming a mouse the information is still inaccessible if one doesn′t know where to look.
I did figure out how to increase the tool-tip size on my screen but it′s not a viable solution as doing so will enlarge everything regardless of character set, plus it does nothing for other readers.
Could we possibly ensure that “tool-tip” information is always available in plain sight elsewhere on the page?
AoV² 19:15, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

However, since you mentioned HTML standards, this is what I was able to find:

  • Some graphical user agents will display a tool tip when the mouse hovers above a form field containing a title attribute. However, current user agents do not provide access to the title attribute content [when browsing] via the keyboard.
  • The tool tip in some common user agents disappears after a short period of time (approximately 5 seconds). This can cause difficulty accessing title attribute content for those users who can use a mouse but have fine motor skill impairment, and may result in difficulties for users who need more time to read the tool tip.
  • It is difficult for most users to resize, adjust background colors, reposition or otherwise control the presentation of title attribute content in many current user agents.

[…]

Note: Current user agents and assistive technologies do not always provide the information contained in the title attribute to users. Avoid using this technique in isolation until the title attribute has wide-spread support.

Source: http://www.w3.org/TR/WCAG20-TECHS/H89.html

AoV² 19:36, 26 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]

To address a few of your points:
  • Not being able to select the text is a limitation of your browser, it could be fixed with an extension to add "copy title attribute" option when right clicking.
  • The reader is informed of its presents with a dotted underline and a help cursor when moving over it.
  • You can define the font and size separate from other text, In winxp: Control panel → Display Properties → Appearance → Advanced → Item: Tooltip. You should also not assume the limitation of your browser (not being able to select the text) to apply universally
Please note, that <abbr> element is used on the history page for the minor and bot flags, so there's some precedents. Looking at the backlinks there are some abuses. So I suggest we change the wording in the documentation so it's clear that it's meant for abbreviation and to use notes for explanation. An example of the former is using No. in table headings where space is limited, but to use Gender[note 1] when giving an explanation. — Dispenser 08:16, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
What extension did you have in mind? Do you plan to write it? Did I say which browser I was using? Well, it′s “Firefox 3.7a2pre” at the moment, should anyone care.
Indeed I wouldn′t object so strongly to this gimmick in cases where the information:
(a) is available in plain sight elsewhere on the page, and/or:
(b) is something trivial which the average person will already know (e.g. that “no.” means “number” or anything else listed as WP:ABBR#Widely used abbreviations in Wikipedia).
However I have not seen such straight-forward use of this template in actual articles. Rather they more frequently employ tool-tip-space to hide matters of serious content such as original proper names (pre-anglicization), and IPA pronunciation data, and image captions. ―AoV² 09:57, 28 February 2010 (UTC)[reply]
The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the template's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this section.