Wikipedia:Peer review/List of unanswered reviews

MainUnansweredInstructionsDiscussionToolsArchiveProject This page contains an automatically-generated list of reviews that are unanswered. This list is compiled automatically by detecting reviews that have not been edited at all after their initial creation. Because of this, this list won't identify reviews which have been subsequently edited. Though such reviews are still displayed in full on the peer review main page, peer reviews that haven't been reviewed and aren't listed here can be added here. Arts Everyday life Engineering and technology General Geography and places History Hard Scrabble and Snow Town I've listed this article for peer review because I want to get this article up to GA status. Over the past few months I redid most of the citations and greatly expanded the article and I want to get a second pair of eyes on it. I'm also trying to track down a pair of citations (discussed in the talk page). Thanks, RI.goblin (talk) 20:39, 20 August 2024 (UTC) Castlereagh–Canning duel I've listed this article for peer review because I am looking to nominate this article to Good article soon. Thanks, Michael G. Lind (talk) 22:44, 19 August 2024 (UTC) Rwandan genocide It's been a while since this article's last Good Article Nomination, and it has expanded considerably since then. I don't see any obvious issues at first glance, other than the History.com ref, but maybe someone else can shed some more light on this. I consider peer review of this article important, since Encyclopedia Britannica still hasn't covered possibly the worst post-Cold War mass genocide, happening in 1994 with 500K-1M dead (though to be fair, they were busy going broke competing with Microsoft Encarta).⸺(Random)staplers 22:51, 17 August 2024 (UTC) Sher Shah Suri I've listed this article for peer review because... 1. I want to improve the article and hopefully move it towards featured article status sometime in the future. 2. Looking to improve my own editing by doing so, as most of this page was written by me. Thanks, Noorullah (talk) 21:40, 16 August 2024 (UTC) Neue Deutsche Heilkunde I've listed this article for peer review because... 1. I feel the article is at a good start. I think its missing some events that I didn't find for one reason or another. I want to add a section about the the mass expulsion of Jewish/ marginalized groups from the medical field in Germany. However, I feel I couldn't do it justice. 2. Also, I cannot read German and rely on AI translations so there might be errors possibly. And makes reading books on the topic much slower / and excludes goldmines of information. 3. I don't know if the formatting is correct for Wikipedia standards. Overall I'd like to see more historical details and format correction. Thanks, Gameking69 (talk) 00:59, 3 June 2024 (UTC) Natural sciences and mathematics Language and literature Shipping discourse I want to take this thing up to FAC one of these days; but it's in a somewhat tricky position. Academic sources *exclusively* take one side of the debate here, and I'm unsure how that jives with the comprehensive coverage of the subject that the FA criteria demand. I'd like it if anyone who has experience taking controversial (esp. controversial cultural issue) articles to FAC can take a look at it, and to see what else I can do to make this article shine! Generalissima (talk) (it/she) 02:58, 12 August 2024 (UTC) Le langaige du Bresil Hello, I wrote this article some time ago, and I have been considering nominating it for a while now. However, I've never had the courage or patience to do so, mainly because I've never been involved in this kind of process before. I'm opening this peer review request specifically to gain a second perspective on what might be improved in the article—if there's anything that needs improvement, which is likely the case, as I'm certainly not an all-knowing being. It's possible that I may have overlooked a detail or two regarding the subject of this article. I believe much has already been done. For example, the manuscript images, which I believe were previously unpublished, were found after extensive searching on Gallica. To give you an idea, some English academics working on a similar manuscript were still searching for this one on Twitter in 2021. Additionally, the information has been compiled, mostly from the works of Rodrigues and Dalby & Hair, which were previously scattered across the internet. I was also able to contextualize and add a brief history of other vocabularies that preceded this one. At the end, there is a brief analysis of the vocabulary's content. I wait for any constructive feedback. Respectfully, RodRabelo7 (talk) 23:48, 9 August 2024 (UTC) Geographia Generalis I've listed this article for peer review because I'd like to improve it as much as possible. I recently created this article, and I'd like outside feedback. Comments about formatting, content, or general editing are welcome. Hoping to bring this up to good article status at some point in the future. Thanks, GeogSage (⚔Chat?⚔) 16:14, 29 June 2024 (UTC) Philosophy and religion Social sciences and society Florida State University Previous peer review This article has been GA-level for years and has degraded over time. It was recently delisted despite being nearly completely rewritten, cited, and checked. A peer review can help identify any remaining problems before the article is again submitted for GAN. Thanks! Sirberus (talk) 23:25, 1 August 2024 (UTC) If another editor would kindly check the references, that would be much appreciated. Sirberus (talk) 13:00, 9 August 2024 (UTC) Comments from Z1720 After a quick skim, I do not see any major issues with the article. Recommendations below: Archive the sources using IA Bot. Remove the gallery under people per WP:NOTGALLERY Avoid short paragraphs, as seen in "Vietnam War", "Other campuses" and "Reserve Officer Training Corps" "Organization and administration" suffers from MOS:OVERSECTION and these can be merged. "Florida State University Libraries" section is too long, suggest cutting prose or using headings to split the section. The images sometimes cause MOS:SANDWICH and should be fixed. Hope this helps. I think this is ready for a WP:GAN. Z1720 (talk) 06:04, 4 August 2024 (UTC) Thank you very much. I will work those items. Sirberus (talk) 12:52, 4 August 2024 (UTC) All done. Sirberus (talk) 14:41, 4 August 2024 (UTC) Nature-positive I've listed this article for peer review because I recently created it and I want to see how it could be improved to be more clear, concise and understandable to a general audience. Thank you! Manxshearwater (talk) 08:59, 6 August 2024 (UTC) Napier Technical College (New Zealand) I've listed this article for peer review because I am having trouble distinguishing between the two sites. I would also like to hear any other general feedback. Thanks, —Panamitsu (talk) 00:21, 19 April 2024 (UTC) Lists WikiProject peer-reviews WikiProject Military history: Muckrach Castle • Military logistics • Military dictatorship • Henry Clay Work • Galatian War • Charles the Bold • 1939 Liechtenstein putsch • Sher Shah Suri • Rwandan genocide • Castlereagh–Canning duel