Wikipedia:Featured picture candidates/Eero Antikainen
Appearance
Voting period is over. Please don't add any new votes. Voting period ends on 11 Apr 2022 at 12:45:38 (UTC)
![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/commons/thumb/f/ff/Suomen_Sosialidemokraattisen_puolueen_kansanedustaja_Eero_Antikainen_vuonna_1951.jpg/350px-Suomen_Sosialidemokraattisen_puolueen_kansanedustaja_Eero_Antikainen_vuonna_1951.jpg)
- Reason
- He is incredibly photogenic, and draws an eye to the article.
- Articles in which this image appears
- Eero_Antikainen
- FP category for this image
- Wikipedia:Featured pictures/People/Political
- Creator
- Pekka Kyytinen
- Support as nominator – Your Evil Alter Ego (talk) 12:45, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose – At a mere 88 words, so-called article is a sliver of a stub. Anyway, the image is just a guy in a suit holding papers. (And this user can raise one eyebrow at a time, too.) – Sca (talk) 13:39, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- Oppose – No EV whatsoever. To quote Bugs Bunny: "Never heard of him - wrong number!" - even though he's a compatriot Finn! --Janke | Talk 20:40, 1 April 2022 (UTC)
- It fails FP criterion #2 1500px requirement. So Oppose. I don't see Janke's EV rationale though. The image adds as much EV to his article as any portrait does to a biography article. Bammesk (talk) 13:57, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- By "no EV" I mean that IMO the whole article is incongruous here in the English-language Wikipedia. Even in the Finnish Wiki, his article is only a stub... --Janke | Talk 17:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
- The article clearly belongs, as it passes WP:NPOL. It is definitely a stub, though. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- FP criteria doesn't address article quality. My opinion on stubs is in this diff. Weak articles are addressed at POTD guidelines: "if the article chosen to accompany the picture is not up to scratch (...), the appearance may be delayed until there is a suitable article to accompany the picture." Bammesk (talk) 03:02, 7 April 2022 (UTC)
- The article clearly belongs, as it passes WP:NPOL. It is definitely a stub, though. —David Eppstein (talk) 17:52, 6 April 2022 (UTC)
- By "no EV" I mean that IMO the whole article is incongruous here in the English-language Wikipedia. Even in the Finnish Wiki, his article is only a stub... --Janke | Talk 17:05, 2 April 2022 (UTC)
Not Promoted --Armbrust The Homunculus 16:16, 11 April 2022 (UTC)