Wikipedia:Featured list candidates/List of Billboard number-one country songs of 1948/archive1
Tools
Actions
General
Print/export
In other projects
Appearance
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
- The following is an archived discussion of a featured list nomination. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the article's talk page or in Wikipedia talk:Featured list candidates. No further edits should be made to this page.
The list was promoted by Giants2008 via FACBot (talk) 00:25, 23 November 2020 (UTC) [1].[reply]
List of Billboard number-one country songs of 1948 (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views)
Toolbox |
---|
- Nominator(s): ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Here is the latest in the seemingly never-ending series of number one country songs FLCs, 56 of which have already been promoted and another looks to be on its way. All I can really say about this one is that it was definitely Eddy Arnold's year....... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:25, 2 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Comments
- Florida Georgia Line spent a 22nd week → Florida Georgia Line spent the 22nd week
- I do not believe that that would be correct English, I believe it is correct as it stands..... -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Between them the five songs → Between them, the five songs
- Add
{{Use mdy dates|date=November 2020}}
at the top.
- That's it from me. Great work! ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 12:41, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Two done, see my response to the other -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 12:51, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support — ~~ CAPTAIN MEDUSAtalk 13:01, 4 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Source review - Pass
[edit]- Reliabillity looks fine
- Ref 8 has a double page number
- refs 8 and 4 should be ISBN 13s like the others (use [https://www.isbn.org/ISBN_converter the converter)
- formatting is great otherwise Aza24 (talk) 06:01, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
@Aza24: - fixed -- ChrisTheDude (talk) 08:53, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Great, pass for source review Aza24 (talk) 09:04, 8 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Support Looks good to me. ~ HAL333 22:33, 11 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
Comments from Dank
- Standard disclaimer: I don't know what I'm doing, and I mostly AGF on sourcing.
- I added {{sronly|Chart history}} as a table caption.
- FLC criteria:
- 1. The prose is fine. I've done a little copyediting with some comments in the edit summaries; feel free to revert or discuss. The coding in the table seems fine.
- 2. The lead meets WP:LEAD and defines the inclusion criteria.
- 3a. The list has comprehensive items and annotations.
- 3b. The article is well-sourced to reliable sources, and the UPSD tool isn't indicating any problems (but this isn't a source review). All relevant retrieval dates are present.
- 3c. The list meets requirements as a stand-alone list, it isn't a content fork, it doesn't largely duplicate another article (that I can find), and it wouldn't fit easily inside another article.
- 4. It is navigable.
- 5. It meets style requirements. You make excellent use of images (but that's about all I'm qualified to say).
- 6. It is stable.
- Support. Well done. - Dank (push to talk) 13:28, 15 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- Closing note: This candidate has been promoted, but there may be a delay in bot processing of the close. Please see WP:FLC/ar, and leave the {{featured list candidates}} template in place on the talk page until the bot goes through. Giants2008 (Talk) 00:12, 23 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive. Please do not modify it. No further edits should be made to this page.