Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/Today

Purge
Shortcut WP:AFD/T

6 September 2024

Read how to nominate an article for deletion.

Recent AfDs: Today Yesterday

Media Organisations Biography Society Web Games Science Arts Places Indiscern. Not-Sorted

< September 05	September 07 >

Guide to deletion

Purge server cache

Driftwood Cottage

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Does not meet WP:GNG and insufficient to be presumed notable by WP:NGEO. Suggesting redirect to George W. Reamer#Professional background, which has been done twice by two separate editors but being objected by an editor. Graywalls (talk) 03:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Architecture, Japan, and California. Graywalls (talk) 03:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Baitul Muqeet Mosque, Auckland

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Unnable to find any actual coverage of the mosque beyond the story regarding the opening. A lot of search results come up with it but it just seems to be used as a back drop for articles talking about islam/mosques in New Zealand. Article can be redirected to Manurewa#Religion where it is mentioned. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Islam and New Zealand. Traumnovelle (talk) 03:20, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Merge to Islam in New Zealand, which already has the photo. I think that is a better redirect than Manurewa#Religion. Readers looking for info on Ahmadi mosques in NZ are more likely to go to the Islam article. Nurg (talk) 04:31, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Scarecrow & Other Anomalies

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only source is to the publisher's website which lacks independence. Fails WP:SIGCOV. 4meter4 (talk) 04:07, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Literature, Poetry, and Spain. C F A 💬 04:12, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment this translation is reviewed here, which says (this is not the full content btw): "The only edition of Girondo's work in English, translated with admirable resilience by Gilbert Alter-Gilbert, Scarecrow is really several books: the full texts of Espantapájaros (Scarecrow, 1932) and Interlunio (Lunarlude, 1937), selections from his first and a later book of poems, the manifesto he wrote for Martín Fierro and cultural notes he contributed to the journal, all in less than a hundred pages each of English and Spanish. Even his final book, the untranslatable En la masmédula (1956) with its playful and constant fusions of language, is glimpsed briefly in the introduction." Alas only one review. So merge maybe, it's noted by Britannica as the only English work. We should probably have an article on Espantapájaros (far more notable) to which this could be merged as its translation but we do not. PARAKANYAA (talk) 07:10, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

For a vote, merge (basically just add that it exists and the source above) to Oliverio Girondo, as the only English translation of his works. PARAKANYAA (talk) 21:05, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment In addition to the review in Literature and Arts of the Americas, there is also another review in Translation Review [1] [2]. That makes two book reviews. James500 (talk) 07:38, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@James500 How long is the review? Do you know what issue it is in? Translation Review is on a WPL resource but I can't find any review for this in a search. PARAKANYAA (talk) 08:03, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@PARAKANYAA: The text can be found here. ARandomName123 (talk)^{Ping me!} 16:28, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
@ARandomName123 Thank you! That one is not sigcov at 67 words so it doesn't much help our case here. PARAKANYAA (talk) 16:32, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see if there is more support for a Merge here.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 03:18, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Embassy of Mali, Moscow

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

One primary source in the article after 16 years. Fails WP:ORG. LibStar (talk) 02:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bilateral relations, Africa, and Russia. LibStar (talk) 02:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Johnny Suh

AfDs for this article:

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article does not present how the subject is individually notable outside of his group as per WP:BANDMEMBER. Previously nominated last year for same reason and the result of the discussion was to redirect to NCT (group). Article was re-created on August 28 but the subject of the article still doesn't have independent notability. RachelTensions (talk) 02:56, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Bands and musicians, Dance, South Korea, and Illinois. C F A 💬 04:04, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect back to NCT (group) Btspurplegalaxy 💬 🖊️ 07:53, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Does the addition of an 'Other Activities' section make any difference to this decision? Wikimaker17 (talk) 17:08, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting to see whether another Redirection is called for or if there should be another outcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:56, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Amel Rachedi

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not finding sufficient WP:SIGCOV of this individual who "presents" a show on her own Instagram channel to meet WP:GNG. She doesn't appear to meet any SNG either. There's just this story in WalesOnline; the rest is tabloid coverage excluded as SIGCOV under WP:SBST, or it's in unreliable sources like Forbes contributors. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: People and Entertainment. Dclemens1971 (talk) 01:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Weak keep: Some coverage in a newspaper from Jamaica [3]. With the Wales newspaper, just barely enough for notability. Oaktree b (talk) 02:08, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Women, Radio, Television, Internet, England, and Wales. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 04:23, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Delete per nom. Catfurball (talk) 15:53, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as there is no firm consensus. Also, participants, avoid "per X" comments which are practically valueless.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:15, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

keep coverage available, see first comment --ProudWatermelon (talk) 01:00, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

So, ProudWatermelon, are you ignoring my advice or making a joke? Sigh. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 07:03, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
what ? ProudWatermelon (talk) 07:04, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
I guess rewriting the same argument as more value, sure ProudWatermelon (talk) 07:05, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And the "Sigh" was just unnecessarily rude and provocative ProudWatermelon (talk) 07:07, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

You think "sigh" was rude and provocative? Compared to names I've been calles on this platform, it seems polite to me. It is just expressing exasperation, it's not about you. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 01:06, 5 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Still no consensus. A discussion of specific sources and whether or not they help establish notability would be welcome.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:50, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

1940–41 Primera Fuerza season

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Only very minimal content inside the article and has no inline citations. The one and only source ([4]) is by the RSSSF, which collects statistics of every football result. Due to it lacking coverage in sources, it fails WP:GNG. Azarctic (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football and Mexico. Azarctic (talk) 01:40, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment I am curious why you picked this season page out of all of them from 1902-03 to 1942-43. Technically there is nothing wrong with the article, it shows a historical table of what was then called an amateur league. However I believe the league did have good coverage in Mexican media. There maybe room for improvement, but in it's current form, I would combined all the league tables into one or maybe two articles. But historically, this league is part of the history of football in Mexico. So... also, how much WP:BEFORE did you do? I guess the coverage would be different in the 1940s due to WW2 and the political situation, so my bet is it's all about the offline sources anyway. Govvy (talk) 09:52, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
These tables are irrelevant anyway. It can’t be that significant if it’s getting 19 views per month either. All these seasonal articles should really be redirected to Primera Fuerza or deleted because there is barely anything in them in terms on content, which is why I picked this one because it has less content than the others, as well as barely any coverage. Azarctic (talk) 11:38, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Giant Snowman 19:14, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Primera Fuerza - possible search term. Giant Snowman 19:16, 23 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Keep – Direct predecessor of the current Liga MX, there is a lack of sources but the notability exists. Svartner (talk) 11:50, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
- In addition, the article in Spanish has literary sources on the history of Mexican football that seem credible to validate the information. Svartner (talk) 11:57, 27 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting. A review of sources, and those in the Spanish-language article, would be helpful.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:13, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Comment - just to be clear, deleting this article would also confer deleting every single "Primera Fuerza" season from 1902 to 1943. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:48, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Keep, as this division is notable, and so are its seasons— important to note that it was the highest-level division in the country. Impossible for me to review and search all the Spanish-language offline sources, but the existence of sources such as Crónica del fútbol mexicano: Por amor a la camiseta and Historia General del Fútbol Mexicano and their usage as sources on the Spanish-language article suggest that they have material related to this specific season and the other seasons of this competition as well. Overall, it does us no good deleting this as it's clearly the highest level for football back then in Mexico, sets a bad precedent for football seasons in other countries too. The only reason this would be deleted is because it's hard to find offline sources, to dissect them, and to use them on Wikipedia. Which would be a shame. Paul Vaurie (talk) 23:55, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
And from experience, the RSSSF tends to be highly reliable for the tables of these older competitions. Svartner (talk) 18:10, 1 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: Relisting as I see No consensus yet. I'll just add that we don't judge notability based on how many views an article gets per month but by whether reliable sources can demonstrate SIGCOV.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

758 Boyz SC

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Redirect to Sint Maarten Premier League as I cannot find any in-depth coverage of the team. JTtheOG (talk) 00:43, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Football, Netherlands, and Caribbean. JTtheOG (talk) 00:43, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:35, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect to Sint Maarten Premier League. New club, fails NORG, plus not enough context. Hopefully the target will be expanded. I have added the year of this club's establishment to the target. gidonb (talk) 02:58, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in WikiProject Football's list of association football-related deletions. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 10:07, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Redirect as above. Giant Snowman 13:04, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Merge what needs and redirect to Philipsburg, Sint Maarten, football clubs can change leagues. They should be recorded on the city page they are in and not the league article. Govvy (talk) 14:57, 31 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Relisting comment: I was going to redirect this article until I saw that two different target articles are being proposed. Hopefully a consensus can emerge after a few more days.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 02:45, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Kiosko (Hendrix)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Fails GNG. One of the 2 sources provided is a primary source. LibStar (talk) 01:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Visual arts and Mexico. LibStar (talk) 01:37, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

New Year's Evil (Nancy Drew/Hardy Boys)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been unable to find sources to satisfy NBOOK after searching on ProQuest, JSTOR, Newspaper Archive, and Google Scholar. I suggest redirecting to Super Mystery. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 01:05, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Best of Enemies (novel)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have not been able to find enough sources to satisfy NBOOK after searching Google News, Newspaper Archive, JSTOR, Google Scholar, and ProQuest. The secondary source on the article does not provide SIGCOV. I suggest redirecting to Super Mystery. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:59, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Mystery Train (novel)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I have been unable to find enough sources to satisfy WP:NBOOK after searching through Google Scholar, News Archive, JSTOR, and ProQuest, though I found a blog review. The article indicates a Nancy Drew game is based on the book, but I have not found secondary sources to verify this claim [5]. I suggest redirecting to Super Mystery. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:53, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

List of college football coaches with 150 NCAA Division I FCS wins

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Not seeing any sources suggesting this grouping meets the WP:LISTN as it is not covered by non-primary sources. Let'srun (talk) 00:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Lists of people, Sports, American football, and Lists. Let'srun (talk) 00:44, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]
Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Sportspeople-related deletion discussions. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 01:35, 30 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I created this page because I believe the NCAA's official career leaderboard for winningest FCS coached doesn't accurately reflect the most successful coaches at that level. (I believe the same issue applies to coaching leaderboards in other divisions.) What we now know as FCS didn't exist before the 1978 season (as I-AA). Before then, the original I-AA programs had either been in an undivided Division I or in Division II. In the early 1980s, a substantial number of conferences and programs were downgraded to I-AA, and movement between the various subdivisions within D-I (mostly from I-AA/FCS to I-A/FBS) and between divisions (most often D-II to FCS) has been pretty much constant. The NCAA defines an "FCS coach" as an individual who served as a head coach for at least 10 years at that level (whether in the I-AA or FCS era), but counts ALL wins credited to that head coach at ALL four-year programs where he served as HC—even if he coached at a program that wasn't in FCS, or at the same program when it was competing at a different level. — Dale Arnett (talk) 06:40, 4 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion and clearer consensus.
Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, ✗plicit 00:49, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Lesedi FM

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

Article about radio station with much unsourced content and lack of independant sources or significant coverage. On inspection one of the three sources appears to fail verification as well. It might be possible that the article could be merged into South African Broadcasting Corporation if, as is claimed in the lead, the station is a subsidiary of that organization, but I cannot find confirmation of this fact. Lenny Marks (talk) 00:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Radio and South Africa. Lenny Marks (talk) 00:48, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Buried in Time (novel)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I haven't found evidence to establish NBOOK after checking for reviews via ProQuest, Google Scholar, JSTOR, and Newspaper Archive. I suggest redirecting to Super Mystery. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:42, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The Last Resort (Nancy Drew/Hardy Boys)

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

I haven't found evidence to establish NBOOK after checking for reviews via Kirkus, ProQuest, Google Scholar, JSTOR, and Newspaper Archive. I suggest redirecting to Super Mystery. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the list of Literature-related deletion discussions. Significa liberdade (she/her) (talk) 00:39, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Dallas Rossiter

(Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)

A before search does not show anything significant for this article. Does not pass GNG or NHOCKEY. Kline • talk • contribs 00:01, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Note: This discussion has been included in the deletion sorting lists for the following topics: Academics and educators, Sportspeople, Ice hockey, and Canada. WCQuidditch ☎ ✎ 02:41, 6 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]