User talk:Yohananw/Archive 1

Welcome! Yohananw

Hello, Yohananw, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question and then place {{helpme}} before the question on your talk page. Again, welcome! -- Ynhockey ^(Talk) 20:21, 17 March 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Right. I would like to write an entry for Fathers' rights movement in Israel. And to translate the fathers rights entry from en-wiki into the hebrew he-wiki. Some CSB (see wiki glossary).

I have a question about these firefox edit-gadgets which I'm trying here on en-wiki on a 2nd boot linux suse 10.3. Do they interfere with editing in he-wiki in iexplorer on the 1st boot ms-xp? Do I need a different login for firefox editing? I'll soon see. Suse 10.3 doesnt support hebrew.

answer: the firefox toolbar gadgets are no where to be seen here in the iexplorer wiki edit. but they dont interfere by their absence... .

Much to learn here. Yohananw (talk) 11:32, 28 April 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hebrew Niqqud/Dagesh

I saw your name among the list of translators available, and I was wondering if you knew niqqud and dagesh well enough to help me. I have been unable to find the niqqud/dagesh for some Hebrew words, and I thought you might be able to help. Thanks.

Brownsc (talk) 01:43, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

I have already had the vocalization done, but thank you for your interest.

Brownsc (talk) 16:52, 14 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

March 2009

Please remember to mark your edits, such as your recent edits to Women's shelter, as minor if (and only if) they genuinely are minor edits (see Help:Minor edit). Marking a major change as a minor one is considered poor etiquette. The rule of thumb is that only an edit that consists solely of spelling corrections, formatting changes, or rearranging of text without modifying content should be flagged as a 'minor edit.' Thank you. While the comment you made about me in your edit summary certainly wasn't as attack, I'd caution you against getting into the habit of making comments about the perceived characteristics of other editors. Stick to the articles and you'll do fine. Gimme danger (talk) 03:34, 22 March 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Notification: changes to "Mark my edits as minor by default" preference

Hello there. This is an automated message to tell you about the gradual phasing out of the preference entitled "Mark all edits minor by default", which you currently have enabled.

On 13 March 2011, this preference was hidden from the user preferences screen as part of efforts to prevent its accidental misuse (consensus discussion). This had the effect of locking users in to their existing preference, which, in your case, was true. To complete the process, your preference will automatically be changed to false in the next few days. This does not require any intervention on your part and you will still be able to manually mark your edits as being 'minor'. The only thing that's changed is that you will no longer be able to have them marked as minor by default. For more information on what a minor edit is, see WP:MINOR or feel to get in touch.

Thank you for your understanding and happy editing :) Editing on behalf of User:Jarry1250, LivingBot (talk) 20:48, 13 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Yohananw. Please check your email; you've got mail!
It may take a few minutes from the time the email is sent for it to show up in your inbox. You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{You've got mail}} or {{ygm}} template.

UOJComm (talk) 05:45, 20 June 2011 (UTC)[reply]

September 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Megatons to Megawatts Program may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

analysis-idUSTRE72C41W20110314|title=Analysis: Nuclear renaissance could fizzle after Japan quake]|work=Reuters|date=2011-03-14|accessdate=28 September 2013}}</ref> (Alternatively, [[sustainable

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 02:55, 28 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

October 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to John Gofman may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "{}"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 00:37, 2 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

November 2013

Paducah tornado, USEC... first time reverted some ip's deletion. see http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Talk:United_States_Enrichment_Corporation#Geoffrey_Sea_on_.22FukUSECshima.22_in_ecowatch Yohananw (talk) 08:34, 20 November 2013 (UTC) Later I understand they were correctly deleted as they did not reference something from each article, just mentioned as part of series ecowatch expose of USEC. But fixed that problem, so each also is cite of its article. Yohananw (talk) 11:41, 22 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Jan 2014 Safecast org stu

okay. this goes into my user talk page as I didnt make find subpage to put comments on starting this stub on a very notable and important organization. safecast.org the radiation monitoring and mapping non-profit volunteer organization which began in Japan following the Fukushima NPP...

I'm a safecast volunteer, user of bgeigie nano kit, outlier (not in a busy hot area). I have no stake in Safecast which anyway is volunteer nonprofit... I confess this is the first article that I'm creating in wiki. I've done janitorial duty.

i see one only begins to learn wiki editing when starting an article... much to learn. -Yohananw (talk) 01:54, 9 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Safecast (precast concrete research) (January 10)

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit if you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Safecast (precast concrete research).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page. Please remember to link to the submission!
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! MatthewVanitas (talk) 19:20, 10 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

OK. My first start article got rejected. I will resubmit it when it is ready enough as stub and for disambig with a current Safecast (org radiation monitoring). Thanks for the (correct) decline decision and constructive advice. Lots of handy tools likeHelp:Citation_tools with Template:Cite doi/doc to learn.-Yohananw (talk)

(talk) 19:47, 11 January 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Yohananw, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Safecast (precast concrete research) (February 5)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time.
Please read the comments left by the reviewer on your submission. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Safecast (precast concrete research).
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the reviewer's talk page.

Thank you for your
contributions to Wikipedia!

Please remember to link to the submission!

You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

~KvnG 04:14, 5 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Use of blogs as sources

G'day, neither Carl Savich or http://derfreiwilligen.blogspot.co.il/ are reliable sources. Please do not add them to articles. Thanks, Peacemaker67 (send... over) 00:52, 29 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Safecast (org)

Hello Yohananw. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Safecast (org)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Safecast (org)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 22:57, 13 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Safecast (precast concrete research) concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Safecast (precast concrete research), a page you created, has not been edited in 6 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Safecast (precast concrete research)

Hello Yohananw. It has been over six months since you last edited your WP:AFC draft article submission, entitled "Safecast (precast concrete research)".

The page will shortly be deleted. If you plan on editing the page to address the issues raised when it was declined and resubmit it, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code. Please note that Articles for Creation is not for indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you want to retrieve it, copy this code: {{subst:Refund/G13|Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/Safecast (precast concrete research)}}, paste it in the edit box at this link, click "Save page", and an administrator will in most cases undelete the submission.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. HasteurBot (talk) 14:01, 3 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:40, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Yohananw. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Page renaming

Hello, you had a question at about page renaming (at Talk:Fog fever), in case you didn't find out the answer already, you can find out about it here:WP:MOVE. DferDaisy (talk) 02:45, 13 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Copyright problem on Fetal abduction

Material you included in the above article appears to have been copied from the copyright web page https://www.researchgate.net/publication/267260633_Cesarean_Kidnapping_Maternal_instinct_Malingering_and_Murder. Copying text directly from a source is a copyright violation. Unfortunately, for copyright reasons, the content had to be removed. Please leave a message on my talk page if you have any questions or if you think I made a mistake. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 21:13, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

to Diannaa Yes I think your edit rollback was excessive and premature. I just noted in article talk that Parker paper was source of some of the new cases on list. But obviously I am in middle of editing searching for better sources and rewriting list. Also you deleted other items not on her list which I found through google, as well as format tags like TOC margin. It would be courtesy to first send message to ask whether working on this list as stated in article talk.-Yohananw (talk) 22:22, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Replied on my talk page. — Diannaa 🍁 (talk) 22:52, 31 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Yohananw. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Yohananw. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Jihad Watch

I see you want to report another editor. I guess you can report me also. I've reverted you including your WP:TAGBOMBING. Doug Weller talk 05:41, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

yep, Mr. Oversighter, I will report both to wiki and on web how you've made a Pravda a political POV of this supposedly neutral encyclopedia. Need to allow some actual content in between your political opposition. At least the first line of entry should be neutral. BTW Robert Spencer is far more than a blogger. See WorldCat for which of his books have been translated into other languages. Compare your:

1) Jihad Watch is an anti-Muslim conspiracy blog[2][3][4] affiliated with the David Horowitz Freedom Center, run by blogger Robert Spencer. It has been described as one of the main homes of the Counter-jihad movement on the internet...

2) Jihad Watch is a news aggregator and forum on Islamic sources of jihad terror which has been online since October 2003. Run by author and blogger Robert Spencer and affiliated with the David Horowitz Freedom Center, it has been described as one of the main homes of the counter-jihad movement on the internet.-Yohananw (talk) 06:50, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Go ahead and report, please. Doug Weller talk 07:57, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Doug Weller, Your oversighter hand has a chilling effect on fixing POV. Compare the wiki entry on Jihad Watch, your incorrect current first sentence (Jihad Watch is an anti-Muslim conspiracy blog) with that of Sourcewatch: "Jihad Watch is an anti-Islamist website and blog."^[1] The conspiracy is yours - the conspiracy of silencing criticism of Islamism (violent, terrorist political Islam) by calling them hate groups and islamophobic. FYI, Jihad Watch includes Muslim authors. None of its authors endorse hatred of Muslims. Commentators promoting violence on the open forum are removed. Your sources are dubious, partial and disputed. For example, Guardian is a UK left journal and hardly an objective source. As for the broken sentence "Jihad Watch has been described --as a hate group-- by the Southern Poverty Law Center[19][10] and Anti-Defamation League.[20]" The SPLC hate groups mapping is disputed, also in court suits. The SPLC drew hate group lists by political preferences and not by stated criteria. Recently in Spring 2019 the SPLC president, legal officer and other executive officers resigned. Once upon a time the SPLC did good work investigating hate crimes. But the SPLC grew old and fat on funding...-Yohananw (talk) 00:36, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I'm disappointed that you haven't reported me. Doug Weller talk 00:54, 19 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

May 2019

Welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute constructively to the encyclopedia, we would like you to assume good faith while interacting with other editors, which you did not do on Talk:Jihad Watch. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. Doug Weller talk 11:58, 2 May 2019 (UTC)[reply]

june 2019"biowarfare" &genetically engineered viruses

Hi Yohananw. In 2016 you wrote "Started and then deleted new section "biowarfare": genetically engineered viruses as potential agents in biological warfare and bioterrorism. But deleted for lack of good refs...." on Talk:Genetically modified virus. Given the recent publication of "Agricultural research, or a new bioweapon system?" would you be interested in attempting your 2016 plan now ? Or alternatively would you be willing to review text I generate in a sandbox? Please tell me if either options interest you. thanks. Maxj27 (talk) 19:56, 6 June 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:10, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

^ "Source Watch on Jihad Watch". Center for Media and Democracy's PR Watch. Retrieved 19 May 2019.

[1] "Source Watch on Jihad Watch". Center for Media and Democracy's PR Watch. Retrieved 19 May 2019.

[1]