Jump to content

User talk:Woodschain175

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
When adding information, please try to cite a source for each statement whenever possible!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Woodschain175! Thank you for your contributions. I am QuackGuru and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions, feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! QuackGuru (talk) 00:27, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

June 2017

[edit]

Information icon Hello, I'm KAP03. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Transcendental equation, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 00:34, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

[edit]

Information icon Hello, Woodschain175. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places, or things you have written about in the article Transcendental equation, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic, and it is important when editing Wikipedia articles that such connections be completely transparent. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. In particular, we ask that you please:

  • avoid editing or creating articles related to you and your family, friends, school, company, club, or organization, as well as any competing companies' projects or products;
  • instead, you are encouraged to propose changes on the Talk pages of affected article(s) (see the {{request edit}} template);
  • when discussing affected articles, disclose your COI (see WP:DISCLOSE);
  • avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or to the website of your organization in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
  • exercise great caution so that you do not violate Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).

Please take a few moments to read and review Wikipedia's policies regarding conflicts of interest, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, sourcing and autobiographies. Thank you. -KAP03(Talk • Contributions • Email) 03:16, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Dera KAP03: I'm sorry I'm not familiar with your policy. I need read some materials then reply you. thanks! Woodschain175 (talk) 11:18, 24 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Woodschain175, you are invited to the Teahouse!

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hi Woodschain175! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from experienced editors like Cordless Larry (talk).

We hope to see you there!

Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts

22:03, 24 June 2017 (UTC)

My reverts

[edit]

Hello Woodschain175, Since you are new to Wikipedia editing let me explain more fully why I reverted your additions at Function composition and Inverse function. This had nothing to do with what you were trying to add to those articles, rather it involves a policy known as verifiability. Editors (contributors) are not allowed to add whatever they wish to the articles. Additions must already be published in reliable secondary sources and citations to those sources need to be given. The insistence on secondary sources is there to ensure that the wider academic community has vetted the concept and considers it valuable enough to write about, editors of Wikipedia should not be doing this themselves. Your arXiv paper fails to be a reliable source for two reasons. First, it is not published (that is, it has not been through the vetting process of an academic journal, just appearing on the web is not considered as being published) and secondly, even if it was published it would not be a secondary source ... someone other than yourself would have to say (in print) that it was correct and a valuable addition. This all means that Wikipedia is not the place to introduce new ideas, there are other venues on the web where that can be done. I hope this helps you understand what Wikipedia is all about. --Bill Cherowitzo (talk) 03:40, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]


Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot

[edit]

SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!

Views/Day Quality Title Tagged with…
17 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Integer-valued function (talk) Add sources
57 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start Complex-valued function (talk) Add sources
61 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Principal value (talk) Add sources
87 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Real-valued function (talk) Add sources
19 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Start Section (category theory) (talk) Add sources
1,932 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Complex number (talk) Add sources
70 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Finitary relation (talk) Cleanup
232 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Smoothness (talk) Cleanup
104 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Transformation (function) (talk) Cleanup
11 Quality: High, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: GA Semigroup with involution (talk) Expand
52 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: B Several complex variables (talk) Expand
352 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Binary relation (talk) Expand
311 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Tetration (talk) Unencyclopaedic
196 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: C Rule of inference (talk) Unencyclopaedic
773 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: B Slide rule (talk) Unencyclopaedic
4,598 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: B, Predicted class: C Function (mathematics) (talk) Merge
329 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: C, Predicted class: C Linear differential equation (talk) Merge
39 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Empty function (talk) Merge
12 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Leiden scale (talk) Wikify
4 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Start, Predicted class: Stub Marek Kuczma (talk) Wikify
54 Quality: Medium, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: C Semantic interoperability (talk) Wikify
3 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Anne Oldeland (talk) Orphan
6 Quality: Low, Assessed class: NA, Predicted class: Start 2018 Men's European Water Polo Championship Qualifiers (talk) Orphan
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Akshar Deep Inter College (talk) Orphan
8 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Symmetric inverse semigroup (talk) Stub
183 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Boolean function (talk) Stub
18 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Projection (set theory) (talk) Stub
2 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Stub Maximal semilattice quotient (talk) Stub
105 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Argument of a function (talk) Stub
55 Quality: Low, Assessed class: Stub, Predicted class: Start Function application (talk) Stub

Note: All columns in this table are sortable, allowing you to rearrange the table so the articles most interesting to you are shown at the top. All images have mouse-over popups with more information. For more information about the columns and categories, please consult the documentation and please get in touch on SuggestBot's talk page with any questions you might have.

SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better — thanks for helping.

If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from Nettrom (talk), SuggestBot's caretaker. -- SuggestBot (talk) 21:30, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]