User talk:Unionyes420

Welcome!

Hello, Unionyes420, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created, such as Sara Nelson AFA, may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the Teahouse, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{help me}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! reddogsix (talk) 23:09, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sara Nelson AFA

The article Sara Nelson AFA has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to be non-notable individual lacking non-trivial support. Reference is a press release.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. reddogsix (talk) 23:09, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sara Nelson AFA for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sara Nelson AFA is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sara Nelson AFA until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. reddogsix (talk) 23:36, 10 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Block notice

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for inappropriate use of multiple accounts. As you are

Confirmed to be User:Twaz, an indefinitely blocked "compromised" account, I have blocked you indefinitely. Although you could have made the argument that you were attempting a clean start after your account was compromised, the fact that you logged back in to your old account to make two inappropriate unblock requests (note the edit summary) after creating this account without disclosing that you were editing via a new account, shows that you are not here to edit constructively. I also have no clue why you continue to falsely claim that you were an admin before your Twaz account was blocked; whatever your motivation, please stop. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. However, you should read the guide to appealing blocks first. Jezebel'sPonyo ^{bons mots} 22:20, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Unionyes420 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I'm trying to start fresh, I don't understand the issue with that. How can I be confirmed to be a person, but yet not have the identity token to justify such? I spent 7+ years fighting vandals, only to be jacked around about which account is which. TWaz was compromised, and then secured once I knew about it. Very simple stuff. Where the hell is User_talk:Bovlb? I hear Jimbo raises some tasty roosters. Anyways, this is ridiculous. I've created, edited, and contributed to literally thousands of articles. I do not appreciated the WP:UNCIVIL tone suggesting I am "not here to edit constructively". Obviously, by the content of the only article I've edited since I've been back, I am here to edit and create constructively. Additionally, I was an admin. I could post to locked pages and all that jazz. Not sure what happened, honestly it isn't about the titles. Unionyes420 (talk) 00:53, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Two reasons. you are a sock of a compromised account, and your claim to have been an admin here is a lie. --Anthony Bradbury^"talk" 09:56, 12 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.