User talk:Ukvoltaire123

Welcome!

Hello, Ukvoltaire123, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you are enjoying editing and want to do lots more. Some useful pages to visit are:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

You can sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date.

If you need any help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. We're so glad you're here! All the best: Rich Farmbrough, 23:37, 26 April 2015 (UTC).

Speedy deletion nomination of Talking Ben

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Talking Ben requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Velella ^{Velella Talk} 18:48, 27 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a message letting you know that one or more of your recent edits to United Kingdom general election, 2015 has been undone by an automated computer program called ClueBot NG.

ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made was constructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this message from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
For help, take a look at the introduction.
The following is the log entry regarding this message: United Kingdom general election, 2015 was changed by Ukvoltaire123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.914716 on 2015-05-07T16:00:27+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 16:00, 7 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Pound. Your edits continue to constitute vandalism and have been automatically reverted.

If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Note that human editors do monitor recent changes to Wikipedia articles, and administrators have the ability to block users from editing if they repeatedly engage in vandalism.
ClueBot NG makes very few mistakes, but it does happen. If you believe the change you made should not have been considered as unconstructive, please read about it, report it here, remove this warning from your talk page, and then make the edit again.
If you need help, please see our help pages, and if you can't find what you are looking for there, please feel free to place {{Help me}} on your talk page and someone will drop by to help.
The following is the log entry regarding this warning: Stephen Pound was changed by Ukvoltaire123 (u) (t) ANN scored at 0.86576 on 2015-05-08T17:44:48+00:00 .

Thank you. ClueBot NG (talk) 17:44, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at Stephen Pound, you may be blocked from editing. ~ ONUnicorn^{(Talk|Contribs)}problem solving 17:55, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Help

This help request has been answered. If you need more help, you can ask another question on your talk page, contact the responding user(s) directly on their user talk page, or consider visiting the Teahouse.

Could you please explain what you're trying to do? It looks like you tried to move the Stephen Pound article, but the title it's at seems the best title. —C.Fred (talk) 18:02, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Two pages for Stevie!! Is that bad? --Ukvoltaire123 (talk) 18:04, 8 May 2015 (UTC)Ukvoltaire123[reply]

Yes. There is no need for you to try to create a second page. —C.Fred (talk) 18:04, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Come on, give old Stevie two pages. Steve Pound is a lucky man!!--Ukvoltaire123 (talk) 18:06, 8 May 2015 (UTC)Ukvoltaire123[reply]

If you have any valid resources to confirm that he is called by an alternate name, then please mention. And then, moving would be done.
aGastya ✉ Dicere Aliquid :) 18:07, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Can you tell us what makes you say that he should have 2 pages? Wikipedia has some set of rules to be followed. You can't demand these non-sensible things.
aGastya ✉ Dicere Aliquid :) 18:11, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Steve Pound is a good MP. Two pages is what he deserves.

Not enough. Anything else to say?
aGastya ✉ Dicere Aliquid :) 18:26, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Final warning

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you vandalize Wikipedia, as you did at User:C.Fred. —C.Fred (talk) 18:08, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Why fred, don't you like cricket?--Ukvoltaire123 (talk) 18:10, 8 May 2015 (UTC)Ukvoltaire123[reply]

@C.Fred: The user is newbie. Please don't be so harsh to him.
aGastya ✉ Dicere Aliquid :) 18:13, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And you, Ukvoltaire123, Please be calm. Go through general instructions of Wikipedia first.
aGastya ✉ Dicere Aliquid :) 18:14, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Acagastya: Given the streak of article vandalism, he's lucky he hasn't been blocked already. —C.Fred (talk) 18:16, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

The user should have The Wikipedia Adventure. I still doubt that his/her behavior won't change much.
aGastya ✉ Dicere Aliquid :) 18:18, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@C.Fred: Does the admins have right to enforce going through TWA for the newbies?
aGastya ✉ Dicere Aliquid :) 18:33, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I am extremly sorry for vandalising Wikipedia. Please forgive me C.Fred and aGastya. I was only being fun with this but it turned out to be more than fun. I will now edit on wikipedia properly.--Ukvoltaire123 (talk) 18:47, 8 May 2015 (UTC)Ukvoltaire123[reply]

I hope you do. And I agree with C.Fred, they're probably the least harsh/most forgiving admin there is- looking at previous behaviour, many other admins would have blocked you already. Look forward to working with a sensible, well-behaved you. Joseph2302 (talk) 18:59, 8 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I cannot believe you all let this retarded serial vandal go without blocking after the havoc he wrought on the UK 2015 general election pages, as well as other pages (Stephen Pound, etc.) And who is the enabling @Acagastya, making ridiculous comments -- sounds like someone in remedial academia!! And after all that the vandal is welcomed twice to The Wikipedia Adventure!! As it is I am going through @Ukvoltaire123's edits to see if any vandalism got through. Quis separabit? 23:08, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Newbies don't know all the rules. And I wished s/he would know the rules, and work here. To have another beginning. To enhance Wikipedia. But I had a doubt that that the user might not change the behavior. But User:Rms125a@hotmail.com doesn't care to read that I had mentioned And you, Ukvoltaire123, Please be calm. Go through general instructions of Wikipedia first. And this is what I have to hear? someone in remedial academia. Just tried to calm a noob and all this? I don't want to Edit anymore. I am not here to be insulted or humiliated.
aGastya ✉ Dicere Aliquid :) 23:40, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You don't need to not be a newbie to know that you should not be blanking hundreds of thousands of bytes of articles on a general election of great importance and then immediately undo the edits, later wreaking havoc on other articles. S/he should play in a literal sandbox if s/he is so immature, certainly not editing Wikipedia. I live in a country where almost every facet of life has been corrupted, defiled, dumbed down, or rendered meaningless, mostly by Democrats and "progressives". I don't want to see that here. So, dear @Acagastya, bye-bye. Quis separabit? 23:47, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

You have a point, but it had already been made more civilly by others. The only effect of your comments was to drive off Acagastya, which IMHO doesn't help anything.ekips39❦talk 04:38, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I completely agree with Ekips39. In fact you made a comment saying bye to Acagastya, like you wanted him/her gone from Wikipedia. That is indeed uncivil. You should know that some people take others opinions seriously, which is what happened here. And everybody makes mistakes. So think twice before being rude at someone. You just caused a stain on your character.--Chamith (talk) 15:03, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@ChamithN and @ekips39: We all are human and lose our tempers. I apologize for that. I do not, however, accept that the effect of my "comments was to drive off Acagastya". I have been editing since 2005. When people leave in a huff (if indeed they do leave or if they really don't return, things that would be interesting to analyse if we had the capability but that would require long-term monitoring and even then would only serve if the editor(s) in question resumed their old usernames) they do so of their own volition. It is often an empty threat that editors used to refer to as "throwing the toys out of the pram", or something like that. Quis separabit? 15:13, 10 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Rms125a@hotmail.com: I too agree that Acagastya was taking your comments too seriously. In my opinion he/she wouldn't have survived much longer here on English Wikipedia if he/she couldn't bare some harsh comments from one other editor. Maybe he/she considered you as a friend and felt violated after seeing your comments about him/her. Nevertheless I think we should just get over this and continue improving Wikipedia. But I must say this, if you want to come back please do so Acagastya. Cheers!! -- Chamith (talk) 04:06, 11 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Ukvoltaire123! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:48, Friday, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Welcome to The Wikipedia Adventure!

Hi Ukvoltaire123! We're so happy you wanted to play to learn, as a friendly and fun way to get into our community and mission. I think these links might be helpful to you as you get started.

-- 18:49, Friday, May 8, 2015 (UTC)

Mission 1	Mission 2	Mission 3	Mission 4	Mission 5	Mission 6	Mission 7
Say Hello to the World	An Invitation to Earth	Small Changes, Big Impact	The Neutral Point of View	The Veil of Verifiability	The Civility Code	Looking Good Together

Get Help

About The Wikipedia Adventure | Hang out in the Interstellar Lounge

Seriously, stop vandalising

This is vandalism. Please stop vandalising Wikipedia, like you promised yesterday- if you continue vandalising Wikipedia, you will find yourself blocked soon. Joseph2302 (talk) 15:11, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

You have been blocked temporarily from editing for persistent vandalism. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text below this notice: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Monty ₈₄₅ 15:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Ukvoltaire123 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I actually stopped after the warning by Joseph today Ukvoltaire123 (talk) 16:12, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Too bad you didn't stop after yesterday's warning when you said you'd now edit properly. I don't see a reason to believe you're any more sincere this time around. Huon (talk) 16:25, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

That's true, but you also said yesterday you weren't going to vandalise again. Also, Wikipedia:Guide to appealing blocks is a good guide for how to make good unblock appeals. Joseph2302 (talk) 16:19, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

This editor should never be considered for unblocking. Quis separabit? 23:10, 9 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Recent edit to Stephen Pound

Hello. I noticed that you made an edit to a biography of a living person (Stephen Pound), but that you didn't support your changes with a citation to a reliable source. Wikipedia has a strict policy concerning how we write about living people, so please help us keep such articles accurate. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! JAaron95 | Talk | Contribs 18:13, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

And before claiming anything, learn to read. Spam? Really? Don't you know the policies of Wikipedia? As Jaaron95 said, you need to cite. Hope you cite now onwards.
117.198.190.32 (talk) 23:20, 13 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

False claims?

You say you are native speaker of English language, but you type ridiculous stuff. Your edit here, is considered as a personal attack. You will report to admin? For what harm? Did not you read the rules of WP yet? So many users have asked you to be constructive here (mentioned above) still your notorious acts have no end?
Listen user. Don't try to expel your frustration on other editors.
You have been mentioned at Administrator intervention against vandalism and an admin will look what to do.
I don't find any good edits by you. either you blank pages/ vandal them or you make edits like this and this. Adding a word or two, and removing it. You added biggest defeat of Lebanon national football team and did not cite it. But now, I find you biting other editors!
117.212.138.199 (talk) 17:47, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

May 2015

Hello. Regarding the recent revert you made to Spongebob Squarepants: you may already know about them, but you might find Wikipedia:Template messages/User talk namespace useful. After a revert, these can be placed on the user's talk page to let them know you considered their edit inappropriate, and also direct new users towards the sandbox. They can also be used to give a stern warning to a vandal when they've been previously warned. Thank you. EoRdE6^{(Come Talk to Me!)} 21:13, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did at Year Nine, without citing a reliable source. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Theroadislong (talk) 21:25, 17 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]