User talk:Trang Oul
Trang Oul (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Caught by a web host block but this host or IP is not a web host. Using Wiki at work, with VPN. Trang Oul (talk) 10:19, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Please disable your VPN in order to avoid this block. Note that doing so may have implications, however. Yamla (talk) 10:48, 24 April 2017 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Welcome to Wikipedia!!!
[edit]
|
Women are evil
[edit]Hi. Your change was reverted by someone else, but I wanted to point out the flaw in your reasoning. , it's equal to ± - you can't assume you take the positive root, as there won't even be one if . -mattbuck (Talk) 02:27, 10 November 2010 (UTC)
AfD nomination for English conjugation tables
[edit]Since you have edited the article or its talk page, I'd like to let you know that the article English conjugation tables has been nominated for deletion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/English conjugation tables. Duoduoduo (talk) 17:26, 24 May 2011 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for November 19
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited English in computing, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Cartridge and Interface. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:23, 19 November 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Please stop moving pages
[edit]Please immediately stop moving pages - your mass moves require consensus but they also violate WP:MOS - in most cases dismabiguators are not capitalized. CUPIDICAE💕 12:58, 10 February 2021 (UTC)
Use of language
[edit]What is "correct" in a language is determined by how the language is actually used and understood, not by your or my or someone else's opinion of how is should be used on the basis of some criterion such as etymology. However words may have been used in classical Latin, "Quaternary" is in much more normal English use for a fourth degree than "Quartary". JBW (talk) 16:21, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
Since posting the above message I have seen another, and far larger-scale, attempt to impose your own view of how English "should" be used. Treating "sinologist" as a proper noun is not supported by normal English usage, nor by Wikipedia's manual of style, nor by logic, since the word is not a name or title. JBW (talk) 16:36, 12 February 2021 (UTC)
@JBW:
By logic, "sinology" should be the same case as "Egyptology" or "Japanology". Please compare this with that. The numbers of terms in each case are similar, but most of the lower case terms are derived from "sinus", not "China". Some of the upper case ones also have alternative lower case forms listed (such as "sinocentrism"), but many do not ("sinophilic").
As a prescriptivist, I thought Wikipedia would use its position to correct such mistakes. But OK, I will no longer fix bugs that became features, if it is frowned upon. Not worth to waste my time on. Trang Oul (talk) 13:44, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
- Wow! So there are still people in the world who openly describe themselves as "prescriptivists". I thought they were extinct. However, whatever your personal view may be, Wikipedia's policies and guidelines are totally unambiguous on this issue: we seek to reflect what is generally accepted, not to impose what one or more people who have chosen to edit Wikipedia regard as "correct". And using loaded words such as "bugs" to describe things that you don't like doesn't somehow give more authority to your views. JBW (talk) 16:56, 13 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:27, 28 November 2023 (UTC)