User talk:Tobiastan
|
Your submission at Articles for creation
[edit]
- If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/PropertyGuru.
- To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, or on the . Please remember to link to the submission!
- You can also get live chat help from experienced editors.
- Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! Snowysusan (talk) 22:16, 16 November 2012 (UTC)
The article Attentio has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
- Single reference to a Press Release authored by company itself does not satisfy the independent reliable sources criteria for mainspace articles.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Hasteur (talk) 15:21, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Attentio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attentio until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Hasteur (talk) 15:41, 9 January 2014 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Grace Sai
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Grace Sai, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Under section G3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, the page has been nominated for deletion.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Cahk (talk) 20:56, 28 March 2015 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Sai (March 30)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Grace Sai and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
Hello! Teahouse,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Oo7565 (talk) 00:57, 30 March 2015 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Grace Sai has been accepted
[edit]
The article has been assessed as B-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Oo7565 (talk) 06:56, 3 April 2015 (UTC)Speedy deletion nomination of Grace Sai
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Grace Sai, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. DGG ( talk ) 04:38, 5 April 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Grace Sai is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Grace Sai until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DGG ( talk ) 19:16, 9 April 2015 (UTC)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Attentio is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Attentio (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. scope_creep 16:55, 26 September 2015 (UTC)
Nomination of Roshni Mahtani for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Roshni Mahtani is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Roshni Mahtani until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lemongirl942 (talk) 21:38, 4 October 2016 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Robert Blakey (October 10)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Robert Blakey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
|
|
Hello! Tobiastan,
I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! MarkTraceur (talk) 17:53, 10 October 2016 (UTC)
|
Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Robert Blakey (December 12)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Michael Robert Blakey and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your draft article, Draft:Michael Robert Blakey
[edit]
Hello, Tobiastan. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Michael Robert Blakey".
In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Legacypac (talk) 16:54, 20 June 2017 (UTC)
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tormod Cappelen Endresen (June 28)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Tormod Cappelen Endresen and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Tormod Cappelen Endresen has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
SweetCanadianMullet (talk) 18:39, 30 June 2017 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Michael Robert Blakey has been accepted
[edit]The article has been assessed as Stub-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.
You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
— Mr. Guye (talk) (contribs) 01:35, 7 August 2017 (UTC)Your submission at Articles for creation: Cocoon Capital (April 26)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cocoon Capital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cocoon Capital, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cocoon Capital (May 7)
[edit]- If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Cocoon Capital and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
- If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Cocoon Capital, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
- If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
- You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.
Your submission at Articles for creation: Cocoon Capital
[edit]You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. If your account is more than four days old and you have made at least 10 edits you can create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.
- If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
- If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider .
Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!
Tobias Tan (talk) 03:02, 10 May 2018 (UTC)The article Martin Roll has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
As the article stands, it seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:PROMO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zazpot (talk) 02:58, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
The article Grace Sai has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
As the article stands, it seems to fail WP:GNG and WP:PROMO.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Zazpot (talk) 04:48, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Possible COI re: Martin Roll
[edit]
Hello, Tobiastan. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Martin Roll, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (see the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Also please note that editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted.
In particular, in this edit, you said both that the image is "copyrighted by Martin Roll Company Pte Ltd in Singapore", and also that "I, the copyright holder of this work, hereby publish it under the following licenses...". This obviously implies that you personally are in a position to legally act as the Martin Roll Company Pte Ltd in Singapore. If so, then this clearly raises a concern that you may have a COI re: Martin Roll. Please can you clarify the situation and WP:PING me in your reply.
Thanks, Zazpot (talk) 22:42, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
- Hello, Zazpot
- I know of Mr. Roll through the INSEAD eco-system, but I have not been asked by him or his company to create this page, I am not taking instructions from him and I am not compensated in any way and I have never ever received or asked for compensation when creating WikiPedia articles. I try, to the best of my abilities, to create neutral, encyclopaedic entries but I am by no means a professional editor. I reached out to Mr. Roll and asked if he had a picture, and since he does not know how to upload a picture, I offered to do it for him.
- WP:PING You ask me to WP:PING but I do not know how to do this....
- Tobias Tan (talk) 15:21, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
- @Tobiastan:, thanks for this information. I have updated the image metadata and the "files for discussion" thread accordingly.
- I appreciate your good intentions, but please understand that, as Wikipedians, we must be very careful not to migrate copyrighted works into Wikipedia or its sister projects such as Wikimedia Commons, without verifiable (ideally, publicly verifiable) evidence of permission to do so, e.g. in the form of a compatible free (as in "freedom") content license. To do otherwise would be to put Wikipedia or its editors at risk of lawsuits from the holders of the copyrights concerned.
- Also, in general, if you have a connection to the subject of a Wikipedia article, do please check the guidance at WP:COI to determine whether, and if so how, to disclose that connection, and also to determine what restrictions that guidance places upon how or whether you should edit the article.
- I appreciate that Wikipedia can seem like a minefield, sorry. Please understand that the rules and guidelines that exist were arrived at painstakingly, and are usually present for extremely good reasons. As one becomes more familiar with them, and especially with the reasoning behind them, editing becomes easier. I hope you won't be put off by your experience so far, and that I will see you around Wikipedia again in the future. I wish you the best, Zazpot (talk) 18:49, 28 August 2018 (UTC)
File:Martin Roll - Senior Advisor.jpg listed for discussion
[edit]A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Martin Roll - Senior Advisor.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for discussion. Please see the discussion to see why it has been listed (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry). Feel free to add your opinion on the matter below the nomination. Thank you. Zazpot (talk) 23:20, 26 August 2018 (UTC)
Deletion discussion about Martin Roll
[edit]Hello, Tobiastan,
I wanted to let you know that there's a discussion about whether Martin Roll should be deleted. Your comments are welcome at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Roll .
If you're new to the process, articles for deletion is a group discussion (not a vote!) that usually lasts seven days. If you need it, there is a guide on how to contribute. Last but not least, you are highly encouraged to continue improving the article; just be sure not to remove the tag about the deletion nomination from the top.
Thanks,
TheLongTone (talk) 15:42, 18 September 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]
Hello, Tobiastan. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Your draft article, Draft:Grace Sai
[edit]Hello, Tobiastan. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Grace Sai".
In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.
If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.
Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. aboideautalk 23:56, 6 May 2019 (UTC)
The article Cocoon Capital has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
WP:MILL investment firm, lacks WP:CORPDEPTH entirely. The entire section Investments, where most of the sources are, is about the other companies not this one. All we can tell is it exists, it has some bucks, and some people work there.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ☆ Bri (talk) 01:11, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
June 2019
[edit]Hello Tobiastan. The nature of your edits gives the impression you have an undisclosed financial stake in promoting a topic, but you have not complied with Wikipedia's mandatory paid editing disclosure requirements. Paid advocacy is a category of conflict of interest (COI) editing that involves being compensated by a person, group, company or organization to use Wikipedia to promote their interests. Undisclosed paid advocacy is prohibited by our policies on neutral point of view and what Wikipedia is not, and is an especially egregious type of COI; the Wikimedia Foundation regards it as a "black hat" practice akin to black-hat SEO.
Paid advocates are very strongly discouraged from direct article editing, and should instead propose changes on the talk page of the article in question if an article exists, and if it does not, from attempting to write an article at all. At best, any proposed article creation should be submitted through the articles for creation process, rather than directly.
Regardless, if you are receiving or expect to receive compensation for your edits, broadly construed, you are required by the Wikimedia Terms of Use to disclose your employer, client and affiliation. You can post such a mandatory disclosure to your user page at User:Tobiastan. The template {{Paid}} can be used for this purpose – e.g. in the form: {{paid|user=Tobiastan|employer=InsertName|client=InsertName}}. If I am mistaken – you are not being directly or indirectly compensated for your edits – please state that in response to this message. Otherwise, please provide the required disclosure. In either case, do not edit further until you answer this message. David Gerard (talk) 07:01, 12 June 2019 (UTC)
I have never been paid or will never seek to be paid for my contributions or edits on Wikipedia. As you will see, I am doing various edits for pages connected with the Singapore entrepreneurial ecosystem and I am always attempting to write in a neutral style and with claims supported by editorial articles. If you find anything I write to not be supported by fact and not from a neutral point of view, please let me know.
Tobias Tan (talk) 01:49, 13 June 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Cocoon Capital for deletion
[edit]The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cocoon Capital until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.