User talk:TheJJJunk/Archive 5

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6

List of Gwinnett Gladiators seasons

Just wanted to say thanks. Was trying to add the playoff results for this year's Gwinnett Gladiators team but messed up. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Gtfan4ever (talk • contribs) 20:14, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

That is perfectly alright. If you need help, feel free to leave me a message. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 21:11, 1 May 2013 (UTC)

CJFX-FM Radio Antigonish Nova Scotia Canada

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/CJFX-FM

This page is incorrect.. I made changes to it only to find out that the changes i made were undone. I work there as music director and on air personality.

We are NO LONGER known as 989 The Nish and any references to that should be removed.

Currently we are "989 Nothing But Hits". The website is www.989xfm.ca, your current www.989thenish.ca does take you to the proper website. the following is what is currently there with noted corrections (in brackets). IF you would like further clarification, please don't hesitate to contact me through email music@989xfm.ca. Thank You.

CJFX-FM, branded as 989 The Nish (989 Nothing But Hits), is a radio station operating out of Antigonish, Nova Scotia, Canada broadcasting on 98.9/102.5 FM. The station has been broadcasting since March 25, 1943. CJFX broadcast on 580 AM for sixty years. While on 580, it was a variety station (country, pop, rock, Celtic). The 98.9 FM signal first went on the air in 1998 to correct coverage issues with the AM signal.[1] It only operated at a couple thousand watts and it rebroadcast the AM programming. In 2003, CJFX was authorized to make 98.9 FM the main signal, increase its power and simulcast its programming on 580 AM for ninety days.[2] At this time, CJFX changed its on-air branding to 989 X-FM. The more powerful FM signal was implemented in early 2003 and the 580 AM signal was shut down for good in June. CJFX also operates a transmitter in Inverness at 102.5 FM [3] to correct coverage problems that were created as a result of the AM transmitter being shut down. In 2007, CJFX was authorized by the CRTC to operate another transmitter in Pleasant Bay, Cape Breton to correct coverage problems in the area due to the mountainous terrain that hinders the main 98.9 FM signal and the 102.5 FM signal from Inverness. [4] The area once received a strong signal from the old 580 AM but lost its strong coverage when the AM signal shut down. When the AM stations from Prince Edward Island shut down, Pleasant Bay was left without strong commercial radio service. [5] On March 25, 2013, CJFX updated its branding to 989 The Nish. (In early April 2013, CJFX updated its branding to 989 Nothing But Hits).It currently offers an adult contemporary music format. (Current on air personalities include, Barry MacKinnon-Program Director/Announcer, Rhonda Howare - Announcer, Paul Kerwin - Music Director/Announcer and a host of part time weekend announcers including, Joe Chesal, Gerard MacDonald, Devin Brown and Glenn Baker. Daryl MacLean hosts a Friday and Saturday night Beach Party at 6 pm, and the station also offers rebroadcasts of American Top 40 with Casey Kasem the 70's on Wednesday evenings and the 80's Thursday evenings starting at 6pm Atlantic Time)

I hope this information finds you and again should any clarification be needed please don't hesitate to send me an email listed above. Thanks for your time.. Sincerely, Paul Kerwin — Preceding unsigned comment added by 142.68.181.53 (talk) 01:55, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Make your edits, but please do not remove the {{Reflist}} template as you did in this edit. This template is needed if there are any citations on the page. This is why your edits were reverted. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 02:08, 2 May 2013 (UTC)

Brian Evans Conway

Why did this happen? I've seen this before in other articles. Please either respond on my talk page or leave me a talkback message. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 15:28, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

never know. I only try to correct the disambiguation notice from a bot for 2 links. May be I do not set my signature because I do not know where. Regards --Elcap (talk) 16:05, 7 May 2013 (UTC)

Help (Magic word)

I'm looking for a magic word or template that returns the name of a random page in a category. This will be the same as Template:Random page in category, except instead of redirecting to that page, the function will merely return the name of the page (URL or title of the article, I don't care). Thanks. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 01:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

I'm not sure if one exists. There are some fairly big technical problems in doing so. For example, how often do you want it to query a random page. Do you want to it randomly pick a random page and then never change? You may as well click random and copy and paste the title of the article if you have no intention of it changing. If you want it to change on a set interval then you'd need to program it to do so. Mkdw^talk 01:56, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

If you go directly to the toolserver page, you will find you have a choice in the "Action" field just above the "Submit" button:

1. Redirect to random page, or
2. Show link to random page.

So, if you know how to use the toolserver directly without the template you mentioned, you should be able to get it to just show a link to the page. Does that help? – PAINE ELLSWORTH ^CLIMAX! 02:25, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you, this helps. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 02:40, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

May 2013

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Fort Heath radar station may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "{}"s. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave my operator a message on his talk page. Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 03:41, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

N Wrong. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 14:05, 8 May 2013 (UTC)

request your Wikipedia expertise on Tribune Media Services page

I noticed you had made an edit to the Tribune Media Services page in April 2013. I am making edits to that page as part of my grade for a Theories of Mediated Communication course. I think I cited everything correctly but would appreciate any edits or feedback. Thanks so much. WakingLife71 (talk) 21:41, 14 May 2013 (UTC)

I edited the page and fixed some errors, and removed an unneeded section appearing to be an employment advertisement. Hope this helps. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 15:47, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

Thank you much for you edits. It is greatly appreciated. WakingLife71 (talk) 15:09, 18 May 2013 (UTC)

Kuala Lumpur FA

Excuse me, sir. The Kuala Lumpur FA page has been vandalised by user 113.210.143.60. I was hoping if you could restore it to its original version. Thank you very much Devinder00 (talk) 11:04, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

It appears that you have undid all of the revisions yourself. Is the page correct now? — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 15:41, 17 May 2013 (UTC)

[[1]]

Hey, remember about a month or so ago when you corrected my formatting on a deceased NFL player? Ted Wegert is another one. Actually, if you look at my edit history there are a bunch. I don't understand why just putting the date of death won't fix what displays, and I think it's a bit insulting to the families of these guys to have them listed as still living when they're clearly not. Thanks for your expertise. Dozzzzzzzzzing off (talk) 20:46, 14 June 2013 (UTC)

@Dozzzzzzzzzing off Sadly, each instance of 'is' must manually be changed to 'was' and so forth. And death templates and dates must also be added manually. It would be nice if it was done automatically, but I don't know of any shortcut to this process. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 15:15, 16 June 2013 (UTC)

Installing ARA

Hi TheJJJunk, I like to install The Automatic Referencing Assistant but I don't know where to place it. i use Opera 12.15. Where can I find common.js --AsceticRosé 11:01, 3 July 2013 (UTC)

@AsceticRose You can create the page by following this link: User:AsceticRose/common.js. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 19:25, 7 July 2013 (UTC)

ARA, section, reflist

Hi JJ. Thank you for ARA, great tool. Forgive me if the following matter has been brought to your attention before, I did a search and could not find it mentioned. When editing this section I noticed that ARA suggested to fix a mising reflist. The article as such has a Reference setion with a reflist. Best, Sam 🎤 08:04, 23 July 2013 (UTC)

@Sam Sailor I have added a condition that prevents ARA from checking for the {{Reflist}} template if editing a section. Thanks for the comment. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 13:52, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Sam 🎤 13:57, 31 July 2013 (UTC)

Hi again JJ. Another little thing that I can't figure out if has been reported previously. I had added a ref to Ferrari F2004 and ARA gave me the "missing Reflist fix" warning. Here it what seems to be the case.

Because the appendix looks like this

==See also==
{{Commons category}}
* [[Ferrari F2002]]
* [[Ferrari F2003-GA]]
* [[Ferrari F2005]]

Fixing it with ARA results in

==See also==

==References==
{{Reflist}}
{{Commons category}}
* [[Ferrari F2002]]
* [[Ferrari F2003-GA]]
* [[Ferrari F2005]]

The culprit seems to be {{Commons category}} placed before the See also list. If {{Commons category}} is moved below the list, there is no problem. I have left the Ferrari F2004 article untouched for your testing. If you want to add a ref and remove the unref tag, you can use this source: <ref name="Acerbi2006">{{cite book|author=Leonardo Acerbi|title=Ferrari: A Complete Guide to All Models|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=AcadRoNSWeEC&pg=PA361|accessdate=2 August 2013|year=2006|publisher=MotorBooks International|isbn=978-0-7603-2550-6|pages=361–|quote=The Ferrari F2004 looked like a logical evolution of the previous season's F2003-GA, at least as far as its exterior lines were concerned. But a more careful examination of it confirmed the new car was the result of detailed refinement, partially ...}}</ref> Best, Sam 🎤 15:59, 2 August 2013 (UTC)

@Sam Sailor Thanks for the tip. What ARA had previously done was grab the See also links and place the {{Reflist}} template beneath the group, but the {{Commons category}} template messed with this process. I think I've fixed the program so that if a template is already located under the See also section, ARA should place the {{Reflist}} template in the correct place. Try it with the Ferrari F2004 article. Thanks, — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 23:33, 6 August 2013 (UTC)

Works fine now! Best, Sam 🎤 06:29, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

Similar problem, only now the Reflist gets too far down and (sort of) "violates" WP:ORDER: Try insert this source <ref name="ArmstrongClark2008">{{cite book|author1=Kate Armstrong|author2=Michael Clark|author3=Chris Deliso|title=Greek Islands|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=4PDWSOx4lUwC&pg=PA128|accessdate=2013-08-07|year=2008|publisher=Lonely Planet|isbn=978-1-74104-314-3|pages=128–|quote=At least three ferries daily leave Andros' main port of Gavrio ... GAVRIO. ΓΑΥΡΙΟ. Located on the west coast, Gavrio is the main port of Andros. Apart from the flurry of ferry arrivals it is very low key and a touch drab ...}}</ref> in article Gavrio and then click the "Missing Reflist Fix". Reflist is below the stub template. I hope I don't sound like a stickler when I mention these cases for you. ARA is a real time saver, and I use it daily. Best, Sam 🎤 07:06, 7 August 2013 (UTC)

@Sam Sailor Firstly, I'm grateful for your comments as you are pointing out flaws in my program. Secondly, I have added a condition in ARA that places the {{Reflist}} above stub templates. It should work. Thanks. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 00:08, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

Seems to work very nicely. Have a nice weekend. Best, Sam 🎤 18:49, 10 August 2013 (UTC)

One more in Graphical timeline from Big Bang to Heat Death. The comment outside square brackets in the last See also entry seems to be the challenge here. Useful ref: <ref name="Betts">{{cite book|author=Patrick Betts|title=Astrophysics|url=http://books.google.com/books?id=k8WShzLxoYYC&pg=PA234|accessdate=14 August 2013|publisher=PediaPress|pages=234–|id=GGKEY:PHFJL5YKE00}}</ref> - Best, Sam 🎤 08:46, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

@Sam Sailor This instance represents a marginal case in which there is text following a link in the See also section. Normally, there is no such text. If I altered the program to place the {{Reflist}} below this text, there could be another instance in a different article where text following the section is supposed to be below the {{Reflist}} template. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 23:05, 14 August 2013 (UTC)

I suppose that could be possible. Best, Sam 🎤 05:14, 15 August 2013 (UTC)

Hi again JJ. In article Dato' Keramat LRT station I noticed, that when the section heading for External links is written with cap L, ==External Links==, fixing a missing reflist with ARA will put ==References== below the EL section. Best, Sam 🎤 10:04, 22 August 2013 (UTC)

@Sam Sailor  Fixed — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 02:36, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Thank you - Best, Sam 🎤 05:47, 23 August 2013 (UTC)

Nomination of Oggy (character) for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Oggy (character) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Oggy (character) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Yann98 (talk) 11:21, 1 September 2013 (UTC)

October 2013 Wikification Drive

This message was delivered on behalf of WikiProject Wikify. To stop receiving messages from WikiProject Wikify, remove your name from the recipients page. -- EdwardsBot (talk) 19:00, 30 September 2013 (UTC)

Help: Script usage

I want to monitor and keep track of the users that use a script that I created (User:TheJJJunk/ARA.js), perhaps by counting the number of times it has been imported using 'importscript'. Is there a way to see/create a category of this? Or is there a way to see a page statistic in this way? Thanks. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 14:11, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

How about a search like this one? -- John of Reading (talk) 14:21, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

@John of Reading Haha thanks, I feel stupid. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 14:24, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

(edit conflict) Hey there JJJ. What you need to do is get everyone using your script to add what is known as a backlink to their importScript call for your script. You can see this in the instructions for use in most of my scripts. Happy scripting! Technical 13 (talk) 14:30, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

@Technical 13 Many thanks! — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 14:36, 7 October 2013 (UTC)

BACKLOG OF THE WEEK Category:Pages with broken reference names

Hello - some editors fight off the vandal hordes, as I do repairing pages with citation errors. If I didn't - there would be a large backlog in Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting and in Category:Pages with missing references list as in Category:Pages with broken reference names (more than 1500 yesterday). But it is impossible to work it alone. Do you know how to do a "Blitz" (excuse the comparision) to find willing editors to work on it. It is much more easier to repair references if you do it one hour, one day or one week ago after the errors were made instead of months and years after the error was done. Very, very difficult to find these errors.

Only with WikiBlame Search it is possible to find and repair such errors.

Best wishes --Frze ^{> talk} 08:49, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

@Frze I monitor certain backlog categories using {{User:TheJJJunk/Backlog}}, a template I made:

Backlog status ()

Category	Current status
Pages with missing references list	Not done
Persondata templates without name parameter	Done
Articles with incorrect citation syntax	Not done
Pages with URL errors	Done

which determines if the category is empty or not. I also use ARA, a script that I developed, to help fix citation errors. I haven't used WikiBlame before. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 16:01, 10 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks and best wishes --Frze ^{> talk} 05:21, 11 October 2013 (UTC)

Is there a possibility to show, if the category has a backlog or not? Category:Pages with missing references list and Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting could never be emty... Thanks --Frze ^{> talk} 11:20, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

@Frze Yeah, see here:

Backlog status ()

Category	Current status
Pages with missing references list	Done
Pages with incorrect ref formatting	Not done

{|class="wikitable"
|+Backlog status ({{purge}})
!Category
!Current status
|-
|{{Clickable button|[[:Category:Pages with missing references list|Pages with missing references list]]}}
|{{#ifexpr:{{PAGESINCAT:Pages with missing references list}}<55|{{done}}|{{notdone}}}}
|-
|{{Clickable button|[[:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting|Pages with incorrect ref formatting]]}}
|{{#ifexpr:{{PAGESINCAT:Pages with incorrect ref formatting}}<40|{{done}}|{{notdone}}}}
|}

You can copy this if you want, all I did was check to see if the number of pages in the cat was less than the number that would trigger a backlog. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 14:38, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Is there a possibility in this wikitable to show how much pages are in the categorie as here? Thanks & Best wishes --Frze ^{> talk} 04:34, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

There was I little mistake between = and < sign and the number of pages if the categories are done. Here is the right version copied into Category:Pages with citation errors. Thanks again --Frze ^{> talk} 11:06, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Backlog status ()

Category	Current status
Pages with broken reference names
Pages with incorrect ref formatting	Not done
Pages with missing references list	Done

{|class="wikitable"
|+Backlog status ({{purge}})
!Category
!Current status
|-
|{{Clickable button|[[:Category:Pages with broken reference names|Pages with broken reference names]]}}
|{{#ifexpr:{{PAGESINCAT:Pages with broken reference names}}<50
|{{#ifexpr:{{PAGESINCAT:Pages with broken reference names}}<22|{{done}}|{{half done|No backlog}}}}|{{notdone}}}}
|-
|{{Clickable button|[[:Category:Pages with incorrect ref formatting|Pages with incorrect ref formatting]]}}
|{{#ifexpr:{{PAGESINCAT:Pages with incorrect ref formatting}}<50
|{{#ifexpr:{{PAGESINCAT:Pages with incorrect ref formatting}}<28|{{done}}|{{half done|No backlog}}}}|{{notdone}}}}
|-
|{{Clickable button|[[:Category:Pages with missing references list|Pages with missing references list]]}}
|{{#ifexpr:{{PAGESINCAT:Pages with missing references list}}<50
|{{#ifexpr:{{PAGESINCAT:Pages with missing references list}}<12|{{done}}|{{half done|No backlog}}}}|{{notdone}}}}
|}

@Frze: Thanks, but that wasn't exactly a mistake. The lower bound of the checking determined if the size of the category was equal to a number because:

1. If there aren't any default pages or protected pages in the category (which shouldn't be fixed or I cannot fix), it should = 0
2. If there are pages of types listed above that stay in the category, it equaled that number because they could potentially be removed. When that happens, your < will work, but suppose now that another "regular" page is added to the category (Take Pages with missing references list for example): There was initially 11 default pages, so there will now be 10 pages. Add in the new regular page, and we have 11. Your < 12 check will return true, so it will still say that the category is done, even though it isn't. With the = check, we know when something like this happens, because even when the template should say  Done, it reports  Not done. It's much safer and lets us know when the template needs to be updated — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 14:08, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Thanks. Of course you are right because you see it "exactly". I see it more from the practical side: There are pages that always appears in this categories. I added ~5 pages because there is always traffic in this categories, pages are coming in and pages are cleaned up by users itself, helpers and AnomieBOT. So you can see at a glance where you are most needed:

 Not done - much to do

 No Backlog - something to do

 Done - nothing to do

Best wishes and nice weekend. --Frze ^{> talk} 18:36, 1 November 2013 (UTC)

Susannah Mushatt Jones

Hi, There was no concern by user:69.209.206.216, which is an IP stalker of mine that exclusively deletes and tags my articles here. Also, The sentence you removed was stated more strongly in the sources, so it is not POV.--I am One of Many (talk) 21:31, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

@I am One of Many Hmm, that's strange. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 21:42, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

I do some vandalism patrolling and I report a lot of spammers (thousands), so I do probably make a lot of enemies. This stalker uses more than one IP address, but concentrates on disrupting articles I have created.--I am One of Many (talk) 21:53, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

The sentence in question from this article is based on this quote: "WHEREAS, born in Lowndes County, Alabama, on July 6, 1899, she was the oldest granddaughter of an ex-slave; her parents were sharecroppers, farming the same land as her grandparents until they died; as a young person she was able and energetic but did not like working in the fields; she knew she would have to leave her birthplace to escape the harsh life and bleak prospects..." [2] from the Alabama legislature. Do you have any objections to my reinserting the sentence in question?--I am One of Many (talk) 22:02, 12 October 2013 (UTC)

@I am One of Many No objections, go ahead. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 14:08, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!I am One of Many (talk) 17:43, 13 October 2013 (UTC)

A bowl of strawberries for you!

Thanks for help. BW Frze > talk 15:17, 15 October 2013 (UTC)

New REFBot

There is a suggestion on Wikipedia:Bot requests#New REFBot for a new REFBot working as DPL bot and BracketBot do. I beg politely for consideration. Please leave a comment if you wish. Thanks a lot in anticipation. -- Frze (talk · contribs) 04:33, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

@Frze I commented! A great idea! — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 15:20, 22 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks!
Ein Dankeschön!

Thanks for backlog template too. Frze ^{> talk} 05:18, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

My your fast

With regards to my edit to History of St Neots My you are fast! I had made the save and gone to the bottom. Edited the References section only to find that when I went to save it Edit Clash! I think your script is useful but it would be more useful:

If a Reference section exists with no {{reflist}} then add the {{reflist}} to a new Notes section immediately before the References section, unless a Notes section already exists in which case call it Footnotes instead.

That would automate what I did with my last edit to History of St Neots.

@PBS If a ==References== section exists, the {{Reflist}} will always be placed in that section. ==Notes== sections (according to the current script) are reserved for textual notes, not sources. There is actually another function of ARA that adds a ==Notes== section and places a separate {{Reflist|group=}} template in that section.

"unless a Notes section already exists in which case call it Footnotes instead." So we potentially could have a multitude of references sections in a single article. "Notes", "Footnotes", and "References". I'd prefer to keep the number of sections to a minimum, if possible. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 21:04, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

See WP:APPENDIX, WP:CITESHORT and Help:Footnotes in neither of the guidelines or the help page are bullet pointed references and footnotes (generated thorough the use of ref..tag pairs and </references>) combined in one section. Basically this is because general references are as {{no footnotes}} explains not adequate as citations as defined by WP:V. So either the general references need moving into further reading, or if they are used as part of the citation as described in WP:CITESHORT, then a Notes section is going to be needed for {{reflist}}. As deciding whether to move selected general references out of a references section is a complicated issue to work out -- both as a programming problem, and more so as an editorial social issue -- the easiest programming solution is to put the {{reflist}} into the Notes section, because usually in mature articles with many repeated citations a separate notes section, containing a {{reflist}}, and references section exist, if for no other reason than to meet the WP:CITE guideline for a list of alphabetically sorted sources in the References section. -- PBS (talk) 21:36, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

@PBS Actually, WP:APPENDIX#Notes and references states that citations and general references can be in the same section. This is what I based the coding of ARA on in the first place.

"It is most common for only citation footnotes to be used, and therefore it is most common for only one section to be needed...If there are both citation footnotes and explanatory footnotes, then they may be combined in a single section, or separated using the grouped footnotes function. General references and other full citations may similarly be either combined or separated. There may therefore be one, two, three, or four sections in all." — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 22:42, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

By citations it means the Long part of a short citation (which thanks to WhatamIdoing and SV) are defined differently from a general references (a general reference suddenly changes from a general reference into a citation as soon as it is cited inline -- without the actual information in the bullet point changing one jot). But what it means by "General references and other full citations" are bullet pointed citations not ones generated by ref..tags and </references> (or the template wrappers place around it). -- PBS (talk) 22:51, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

@PBS Ahh, I see. Thanks. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 22:58, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I think that is the simplest way to interpret the green quote, or else one is faced with two different scenarios for a {{reflist}} because as soon as someone adds a footnote as a short citation -- suddenly the {{reflist}} would not consist of only "long citations" and would have to be moved! The truth is the whole area of citations is a mares nest, as the old Irish country saying goes when asked for direction which involved a complicated directions "If I was going there, I wouldn't start out from here", but we are here and altering it is a lot of trouble, particularly as there are a lot of experienced influential editors who don't understand citation templates, but tend to give other reasons for not using them and resist any change that might make their use more common.

BTW, I saw a page the other day that used "#" instead of "*" at the start of the lines in a general references section, I was baffled before I edited the page as to why I could see what looked like a {{reflist}} of citations but could not see the corresponding numbers in the body of the text! Now that is one that is not in your list of possible errors but then againt it is is not a common one :-) TTFN -- PBS (talk) 23:32, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

@PBS Haha, I added that one to the list! And thanks for the help and advice! — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 23:37, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

BTW there is really no reason to separate out {{notelist}}(s) and {{reflist}} into different sections as the lists display differently. As an aesthetic point, simply adding a columns parameter to {{reflist}} has all the of visual impact that is necessary for the eye to see the difference imminently (although some like to put Footnote and Citation as bold text on separate lines to make the difference even more obvious. -- PBS (talk) 21:54, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

And secondly:

if it adds a {{reflist}} and a {{no footnotes}} is present alter it to {{more footnotes|date={{subst:CURRENTMONTH}}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}} }}, or if {{unreferenced}} is present alter it to {{refimprove|date={{subst:CURRENTMONTH}}} {{subst:CURRENTYEAR}}}}.

 In progress. I'll look into this. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 21:04, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

 Half done @PBS I added a function to the script to remove the tags if <ref> tags and the {{reflist}} template is present, but it won't add {{refimprove}} because not all articles need more references. That/(those) added citations could have completely verified all statements in the (especially if a small) article. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 23:25, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

I see you point and it is a valid one, but I think removing it all together will annoy more editors than it pleases. Most editors won't care, but if the template was added recently, the editor who added it may still watch the page and will care if his/her carefully paced template is removed because just one inline citation has been added to a page that needs dozen). So I think that you should leave it to a human to decide if the template should be removed. After all whoever made the edit you are fixing did not bother to do so. -- PBS (talk) 23:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

That is why it is a separate function (which is the user's choice to activate), to be titled possible outdated template and the description will be References are present on the page. Factually, "unreferenced" does not apply. Or something of that nature. Because the article is no longer unreferenced, so it should not have an unreferenced tag. If the editor who placed the tag (or the user of ARA) thinks there should be more references, they can add the more footnotes tag. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 23:52, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

-- PBS (talk) 17:43, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

Thanks for the advice. — JJJ ^{(say hello)} 21:04, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

My pleasure, as I wrote above I think your took is useful and all I am suggesting a few changes. BTW another script I find useful is User:Ucucha/HarvErrors if you have not seen it you might find its output interesting when viewing pages with a lot of short citations. --PBS (talk) 21:46, 23 October 2013 (UTC)

A barnstar for you!

	The Citation Barnstar
	Thanks for working on (arguably) the most important part of the project! -- Wywin (talk | contribs) 20:02, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

@Wywin: Thanks! — TheJJJunk ^{(say hello)} 20:05, 5 November 2013 (UTC)

Con-er

Perhaps even more obvious was that there were no Olympic Games in 1946. They only occur in years where the last two digits are 00 or are divisible by four... Peridon (talk) 15:39, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

@Peridon: Ahh.. That's what I thought, but didn't know for sure. — TheJJJunk ^{(say hello)} 18:43, 6 November 2013 (UTC)

Archive 1

←

Archive 3

Archive 4

Archive 5

Archive 6