Jump to content

User talk:voorts

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
(Redirected from User talk:TechnicallyVoorts)


Edah HaChareidis - is this covered by ARBPIA?

[edit]

Nothing on the talk page. Doug Weller talk 16:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I would say probably, but I don't handle ARBPIA, so it might be best to ask an admin who does. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:50, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Any suggestions? Doug Weller talk 17:57, 5 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I see @Vanamonde93 works on ARBPIA. Best, voorts (talk/contributions) 05:54, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Thanks. It's sorted now. Doug Weller talk 10:17, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks!

[edit]

Hello, Voorts

I appreciate your help sorting out the situation at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Query to admins. I have no idea why this editor views me so poorly but clearly everything I said or did was unsatisfactory and we needed a third party. I posted that query to gather feedback about my actions but it also helped resolve the IBan situation so it did serve a purpose.

Despite being an admin for close to 10 years now, this really hasn't happened to me very many times except when blocked editors occasionally return to vandalize my User talk page. And even that doesn't happen that much. I also have meant to say that for a new admin, you have been very, very busy, especially resolving complaints at AN and ANI. Many new admins would steer clear of noticeboards so thank you for all of your contributions since your RFA. It's made a difference. Liz Read! Talk! 05:20, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks Liz. I'm happy to do it. voorts (talk/contributions) 05:50, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Comment

[edit]

Hello Voorts. Not sure if it's you or Rosguill who will review Moribundums unblock request.

I will note they're again accusing me of censorship in what was meant to be a constructive discussion, and making repetitive WP:1AM arguments, as shown above and below comment here. Two other editors agreed their proposed paragraph was excessive for this article.

I also noted their use of a self published source 28 times in a MED article just a few weeks ago. Certainly not a few minor mistakes as they claim in their unblock request. I thought they might just address this instead of deleting it.

Maybe a case of WP:ROPE and seeing what they do with it though. Zenomonoz (talk) 12:00, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

I've recused myself from reviewing their unblock request as I think I'm too involved in the weeds at this point. signed, Rosguill talk 17:27, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I'm busy today. If there are issues that other admins need to review, do what you think is appropriate. voorts (talk/contributions) 17:29, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Alright, looks like Moribundum is doing a bit of WP:FORUMSHOP now after the post on Rosguill’s talk and now here to Liz. Tagging Liz in case the above is relevant.
On the other hand, Moribundum did suggest to Liz that their block could be lifted but stay in place on the ‘fecal incontinence’ article, which is where the dispute arose and where the incivility and WP:1AM has happened. A potential option. Zenomonoz (talk) 21:31, 8 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

CSD and compatible free license clarification

[edit]

Hey Voorts, quick question about the CSD you declined. I know the page has a {{free content attribution}} tag on it, I was the one to place it during cleanup. But in researching the license the for tag, I see that the source stipulates non commercial in their copyright licence, see [1]. And when I was making sure it was above board, my understanding of WP:COMPLIC as you linked to it in your declination edit summary, was that NC free linceses weren't compatible. If I'm wrong, that's fine, but would you mind clarifying? Many thanks, Bobby Cohn (talk) 13:47, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You're correct. I missed that it was NC. I'll delete it. voorts (talk/contributions) 22:39, 9 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Question from Collins okwu on Talk:File-hosting service (00:23, 10 February 2025)

[edit]

Advices for me, Broskalitre

[edit]

Hello voorts, I am keen on improving my editing skills so that I will not make a mistake editing next time. So when I make a mistake while editing, can you tell me the problem and advice for me? Thank you Broskalitre (talk) 14:04, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hello voorts, can I also ask you if I can add additional information to articles? I am also afraid if I correct errors which may include only 2-5 words, you guys will take it as gaming the system so I want to confirm first before I edit. Broskalitre (talk) 14:14, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
I can't keep track of your edits and tell you what you're doing wrong. I would recommend fully familiarizing yourself with our guidelines on reliable sources and verifiability. voorts (talk/contributions) 16:03, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]
ok Broskalitre (talk) 16:57, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

2025 Potomac River mid-air collision

[edit]

"And then they almost immediately removed the block notice. They know where to find us if they want to talk about their edit warring and other issues."

What are you talking about?? I don't know anything about where to find people to talk. Ryke001 (talk) 23:23, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You were notified of the AN/I thread, notified of it again when I blocked you, and you deleted both of those notifications. If you want to request an unblock, you can do so using the {{unblock}} template on your talk page. voorts (talk/contributions) 23:51, 11 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]