User talk:Bobby Cohn

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page and ping me ({{Ping|Bobby Cohn}}), so that I will be notified.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page and notify you.

and other talk page banners.

Archives: Index 0, 1, 2, 3, 4, 5, 6, 7

This page has archives. Sections older than 7 days may be automatically archived by .

This user is busy in real life and may not respond swiftly to queries.

SCAM WARNING!
If someone contacts you asking for money to get a draft published, improve a draft, or restore a deleted article—do not trust them! These offers are scams. Report them to paid-en-wpwikipedia.org. See WP:SCAM for more information.

This user talk page might be watched by friendly talk page stalkers, which means that someone other than me might reply to your query. Their input is welcome and their help with messages that I cannot reply to quickly is appreciated.

I do not remove personal attacks directed at me from this page. If you spot any, please do not remove them, even if vile, as they speak more against the attacker than against me.

This user talk page often deals with similar or reoccurring topics. Please use a descriptive section title when leaving a new message. Generic titles of messages may be refactored for clarity, such as renaming the section title to a link of the topic page.

This user is a regular and doesn't mind if you template him. Though he will appreciate if you expand on your reasoning should your concern not be immediately apparent.

Click here to start a new discussion.

Right argument, wrong case

Moeed Pirzada would fall under India-Pakistan, not any of the Arab-Israeli conflict Arbitrations. But your argument is still more-or-less correct given the meatpuppetry around Pirzada's article. —Jéské Couriano v^_^v ^{threads critiques} 18:12, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @Jéské Couriano, an unfortunate copy-paste error that, given the subject matter, is extra embarrassing. And given that the discussion has been closed, it looks like my mistake will be immortalized. I have to admit I'm rather embarrassed by that one, but I'll keep a closer eye in the future. Thanks for the heads up. Bobby Cohn (talk) 18:18, 14 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Jack Rechcigl - new draft

Hi Bob, I hope this finds you well, it's being a while since I talked to you. I still have some doubts, since my submission was declined, I’d like to know if I can start again by submitting only part of the original article. If that portion is accepted, I could then gradually add more to the same article. My main goal is to have at least some information about him included, and if that works, I can expand on it over time. I also want to make sure I am doing it correctly to avoid another rejection. If it's possible how should I proceed? I will be working on the draft, should I send you the draft? @Bobby Cohn AgroLover (talk) 18:18, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Hi @AgroLover, last couple times you left a message, my replies went unanswered, but the advice is still valid. See my previous replies in the archives at the following locations:

Likely what you need to do is do a lot of cutting what isn't appropriate, see the previous advice.

Good luck, Bobby Cohn (talk) 18:22, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Mario Farrugia Borg

Dear @Bobby Cohn,

Thank you for the help that you have already given me. However, I am an intern for this office and therefore am not getting paid to do this. I had recieved some help from other editors and was told that this was the case.

Many thanks Adamosfb2511 (talk) 22:31, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

@Adamosfb2511: interns are included in the policy of WP:PAID, please read the policy. I will quote the relevant part here: Interns are considered employees for this purpose. I will duplicate this again on your talk page. Please make the disclosure. Bobby Cohn (talk) 22:36, 19 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

You have to understand how much that argument really isn't going to fly when you use your office to sign your posts. —Bobby Cohn (talk) 00:54, 20 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]

DYK for Stretcher railing

On 21 February 2025, Did you know was updated with a fact from the article Stretcher railing, which you recently created, substantially expanded, or brought to good article status. The fact was ... that some railings in London have kinks (example pictured), indicating their original use as stretchers? The nomination discussion and review may be seen at Template:Did you know nominations/Stretcher railings. You are welcome to check how many pageviews the nominated article or articles got while on the front page (here's how, Stretcher railing), and the hook may be added to the statistics page after its run on the Main Page has completed. Finally, if you know of an interesting fact from another recently created article, then please feel free to suggest it on the Did you know talk page.

RoySmith (talk) 00:02, 21 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]