User talk:TTCTransportationFan4644

--2601:182:102:1737:8953:AF19:BDD3:D849 (talk) 20:58, 23 January 2017 (UTC)== Welcome! ==[reply]

Hello, TTCTransportationFan4644, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to take the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit The Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! Parsley Man (talk) 17:46, 14 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Michael Kukielka

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Michael Kukielka requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person or group of people, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Υπογράφω (talk) 03:24, 20 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

https://www.youtube.com/results?search_query=goanimate+shutting+down+in+2017

Proposed deletion of List of Blue's Clues home video releases

The article List of Blue's Clues home video releases has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This is an unreferenced article, of dubious separate notability, on a subject that has been hoaxed on and off for years. Maybe this time it is real but we can't assume that without proof. References are needed or we have to assume this is not real.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. DanielRigal (talk) 19:16, 27 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Goanimate Wikias

look TTCTransportationFan4644 if you like goanimate just go to one of Goanimate Wikias! [1] [2] [3] [4] [5] [6] [7] — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2601:182:102:1737:89D0:C92:1E04:D49F (talk) 23:40, 22 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of List of Blue's Clues home video releases for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Blue's Clues home video releases is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Blue's Clues home video releases until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DanielRigal (talk) 18:09, 23 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

You have been blocked from editing for a period of 60 hours for abusing multiple accounts. Note that multiple accounts are allowed, but not for illegitimate reasons, and any contributions made while evading blocks or bans may be reverted or deleted. Once the block has expired, you are welcome to make useful contributions. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. —DoRD (talk) 16:06, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You kids don't even know what blocking is. Also I wasn't even abusing accounts. TTCTransportationFan4644 (talk) 16:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TTCTransportationFan4644 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

I was only making relevant edits, not to abuse or vandalize pages or accounts. TTCTransportationFan4644 (talk) 16:25, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

This does not address the reason for your block, which is that you used multiple accounts. Yamla (talk) 16:28, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

TTCTransportationFan4644 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Request reason:

How the hell I was using multiple accounts? Checkuser is unreliable and should be killed. I am using one account only.

TTCTransportationFan4644 (talk) 16:54, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Decline reason:

Checkuser verified abuser of multiple accounts. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 18:07, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

See WP:NOR, WP:TRUTH, and WP:HERE. Wikipedia cannot have original research regardless of whether it is true or not. If you really want a wiki devoted to Blue's Clues and allowing some original research, here you go [[8]]. And a list of videos like you want too. 2600:1:F18E:779D:2961:E106:9A9D:7391 (talk) 19:19, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

TPA

I suggest that TPA be removed. - Mlpearc (open channel) 20:10, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No kidding. Talk page access revoked. --jpgordon^{𝄢𝄆 𝄐𝄇} 20:11, 10 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, TTCTransportationFan4644. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]