User talk:Suzcommun

Hello, Suzcommun, and Welcome to Wikipedia!

Please remember to sign your name on talk pages by clicking or or by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your username and the date. Also, please do your best to always fill in the edit summary field. Below are some useful links to facilitate your involvement. Happy editing! SwisterTwister talk 03:39, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Getting started
Introduction The five pillars of Wikipedia How to edit a page Intuitive guide to Wikipedia
Finding your way around
Table of contents Department directory
Editing articles
How to develop an article Simplified Manual of Style

Getting help
Frequently asked questions Cheatsheet Where to ask a question Help pages New contributors' help page Article Wizard – a Wizard to help you create articles
How you can help
Contributing to Wikipedia Community Portal Join a WikiProject Follow Wikipedia etiquette Practice civility

Your submission at Articles for creation

Thank you for your recent submission to Articles for Creation. Your article submission has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please view your submission to see the comments left by the reviewer. You are welcome to edit the submission to address the issues raised, and resubmit once you feel they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, you can find it at Wikipedia talk:Articles for creation/D&H Distributing.
To edit the submission, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the help desk, via real time chat with helpers, or on the reviewer's talk page

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia! — Dmitrij D. Czarkoff (talk•track) 12:37, 14 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Suzcommun. You have new messages at Czarkoff's talk page.
Message added 00:03, 18 September 2012 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Review of page we discussed

Copied from User talk:Obsidian Soul#Review of page we discussed for convenience

Hi there, Obsidian Soul (cool name, BTW.) You helped me out the other day on the help autobot when I was confused about why the references on my submission were in question. I've reformatted things according to your advice and the templates you referred me to. Since you commented that you thought my references were actually very good, could I request that you review the submission this time? I would appreciate it since you're somewhat familiar with it at this point. Let me know if this is possible. Thank you for your help. Here is the link to the submission, although please check for the latest revision as I am new at this and still a little uncertain as to the whole process.

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Articles_for_creation/D%26H_Distributing

Note I can't see the citation reformatting that I've done so I hope you can. Hope I've done it right.

Again, thanks for your advice!

Sue ~~Suzcomm — Preceding unsigned comment added by Suzcommun (talk • contribs) 20:42, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, Sue. Good job on formatting the references, but you still haven't fixed the rest of what was discussed in the help chat. And sorry but I must decline. I don't normally review the articles I gave advice on, as I might not notice some things an uninvolved and more objective editor would. But I can still give you advice on what else you need to fix.

1) The article's table of contents is generated automatically if you have created your section headers correctly. Section headers should be enclosed in == and not merely bolded as you have done, please see WP:CHEATSHEET for the basics in Wikipedia code, and compare your article with existing ones to see how sections are treated.

2) A large part of your article's tone is still inappropriate for an encyclopedia. It reads like a brochure. Remember that promotion is forbidden in Wikipedia, please see WP:Words to watch for a rundown on what words and expressions you should avoid. In general, please write formally, concisely, and factually in a neutral point-of-view; even if doing so results in prose that is coldly clinical. Avoid colloquialisms, subjective opinion, "PR-speak", or sentences aimed to unjustifiably flatter the subject or excessive detail aimed to sell something. Such sentences should be removed or reworded. Examples of which are listed listed below:

It also demonstrated one of its first exercises in supporting its resellers through economic and other hardships, which has become an intrinsic element of its value proposition through the decades.
It focuses on emerging technologies and personalized service, offering dedicated account reps, flexible credit options and value-based programs, carrying thousands of skus from hundreds of manufacturers.
Through the D&H Partner Services program, customizable marketing materials, such as solutions-focused brochures, product images and vendor logos, help customers promote their own brands and services.

etc.

3) Though your references are formatted correctly, your article is still not referenced properly. As I said in the help chat, references are there to verify the information you have written, they are not "see also" links but "click here to see where this info is from" links. Every sentence or paragraph in the article must explicitly have a reference that tells the reader where that information comes from.

Once you have fixed those, you can resubmit your article for review by clicking the link in the previous decline template that says: When you are ready to resubmit, click here. Please try to improve the article as best as you can before doing so, though, to avoid wasting your (and the reviewer's) time. Waiting for review can take a few days to more than a week, and that can add up to months if it gets declined for one reason or the other. Cheers.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 03:27, 21 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation

D&H Distributing, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you are more than welcome to continue submitting work to Articles for Creation.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Bjelleklang - talk 13:40, 20 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

License tagging for File:Dan Schwab DH Corp-3249.jpeg

Thanks for uploading File:Dan Schwab DH Corp-3249.jpeg. You don't seem to have indicated the license status of the image. Wikipedia uses a set of image copyright tags to indicate this information.

To add a tag to the image, select the appropriate tag from this list, click on this link, then click "Edit this page" and add the tag to the image's description. If there doesn't seem to be a suitable tag, the image is probably not appropriate for use on Wikipedia. For help in choosing the correct tag, or for any other questions, leave a message on Wikipedia:Media copyright questions. Thank you for your cooperation. --ImageTaggingBot (talk) 20:06, 20 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Schwab (February 22)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Lixxx235 was:

This submission appears to read more like an advertisement than an entry in an encyclopedia. Encyclopedia articles need to be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources, not just to materials produced by the creator of the subject being discussed. This is important so that the article can meet Wikipedia's verifiability policy and the notability of the subject can be established. If you still feel that this subject is worthy of inclusion in Wikipedia, please rewrite your submission to comply with these policies.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Schwab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

--L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 04:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Suzcommun, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! --L235 (t / c / ping in reply) 04:56, 22 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

File source and copyright licensing problem with File:Michael Schwab DH Corp-3257.jpg

File Copyright problem

Thanks for uploading File:Michael Schwab DH Corp-3257.jpg. However, it currently is missing information on its copyright status and its source. Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously.

If you did not create this work entirely yourself, you will need to specify the owner of the copyright. If you obtained it from a website, please add a link to the page from which it was taken, together with a brief restatement of the website's terms of use of its content. If the original copyright holder is a party unaffiliated with the website, that author should also be credited. You will also need to state under what licensing terms it was released. Please refer to the image use policy to learn what files you can or cannot upload on Wikipedia. The page on copyright tags may help you to find the correct tag to use for your file.

Please add this information by editing the image description page. If the necessary information is not added within the next days, the image will be deleted. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem.

Please also check any other files you may have uploaded to make sure they are correctly tagged. Here is a list of your uploads. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. Eeekster (talk) 19:00, 24 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of File:Dan Schwab DH Corp-3249.jpeg

A tag has been placed on File:Dan Schwab DH Corp-3249.jpeg requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section F1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the image is an unused redundant copy (all pixels the same or scaled down) of an image in the same file format, which is on Wikipedia (not on Commons), and all inward links have been updated.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Stefan2 (talk) 22:46, 25 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Schwab (March 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Schwab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 23:36, 4 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Schwab (March 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Kikichugirl was:

This submission does not appear to be written in the formal tone expected of an encyclopedia article. Entries should be written from a neutral point of view, and should refer to a range of independent, reliable, published sources. Please rewrite your submission in a more encyclopedic format. Please make sure to avoid peacock terms, that are designed to promote or show-off the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Schwab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

— kikichugirl ^oh hello! 23:48, 20 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Schwab (April 25)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Schwab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 17:34, 25 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Daniel Schwab (July 23)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Sulfurboy was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Daniel Schwab and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get Wikipedia's Live Help real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Sulfurboy (talk) 18:57, 23 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

D&H Distributing

Hi. I have reverted some of your edits to D&H Distributing, as they were based solely on unreliable sources such as newsletters, press releases, material published by partners of D&H Distributing and so on. Please refer to the guideline on how to identify reliable sources before adding more material to the article, as using bad sources only serves to lower the quality of the article. Bjelleklang - talk 20:05, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I have gone over the article and removed quite a lot of content; some of it based on unreliable sources and some not really relevant for the article as it was promotional in nature. I have also looked at your contributions, and my impression is that you seem to have a very special interest in D&H Distributing. I have to ask; do you have any affiliation with them? Keep in mind that disclosing any affiliations of this nature is required by the terms of use; please see Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure. If you have no affiliation with the company I apologise, unfortunately this is an all too common problem on Wikipedia and we have to combat it to prevent the encyclopedia from becoming just another web directly with no encyclopedic value. Bjelleklang - talk 21:00, 12 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:Daniel Schwab concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:Daniel Schwab, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:30, 2 January 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Daniel Schwab

Hello, Suzcommun. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Daniel Schwab".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 12:47, 2 February 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, Suzcommun. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on the page D&H Distributing, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Longhair\^talk 18:37, 21 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]