User talk:SuzanneKn

File:WilliamIVAlbury.jpg

The file was moved to Commons und now needs categories. Since I don't know which Albury it is, I can't do this for you. If it is the one in Surrey, there are even categories Inns in Surrey and Pubs in Surrey. -- Hämbörger (talk) 18:31, 6 February 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GH Dury

The article GH Dury has been proposed for deletion because, under Wikipedia policy, all newly created biographies of living persons must have at least one reference to a reliable source that directly supports material in the article.

If you created the article, please don't be offended. Instead, consider improving the article. For help on inserting references, see Referencing for beginners, or ask at the help desk. Once you have provided at least one reliable source, you may remove the {{prod blp}} tag. Please do not remove the tag unless the article is sourced. If you cannot provide such a source within ten days, the article may be deleted, but you can request that it be undeleted when you are ready to add one. Nat Gertler (talk) 15:57, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Never mind; have now found source indicating the subject is, well, no longer subject to "living persons" restrictions. The prod has been removed, all is fine, have a nice day! --Nat Gertler (talk) 16:08, 24 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Ghost in Burpham, Surrey?

Hi Suzanne, I cordially invite you to make your thoughts known on best place to put the ghost: Talk:Burpham,_Surrey Adam37 (talk) 21:27, 13 June 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Andrew Doughty for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Andrew Doughty is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Andrew Doughty until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. -- Cain Mosni (talk||contribs) 15:15, 25 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Original Barnstar
	Thanks for all of your pictures related to urban morphology! I couldn't have done some of my school projects without your contributions. :) Crimson Inkstone (talk) 11:35, 3 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Trumps Green

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Trumps Green requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, you can place a request here. A412 (Talk • C) 19:15, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 16

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Saelices, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Roman. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:31, 16 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Thorpe Park No 1 Gravel Pit

The article Thorpe Park No 1 Gravel Pit has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

The article could and should be covered under List of SSSIs in Surrey as it fails to meet its own article WP:N based on its own history, diversity and size all of which are so limited as to be best covered there in a global encyclopedia or new Surrey article per WP:MERGE.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. - Adam37 Talk 15:12, 9 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 16:29, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Christina Carpenter

Thanks to your picture Victuallers (talk) 11:56, 16 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Image copyright problem with File:Farnham Castle 2.jpg

Thank you for uploading File:Farnham Castle 2.jpg.

This image is a derivative work, containing an "image within an image". Examples of such images would include a photograph of a sculpture, a scan of a magazine cover, or a screenshot of a computer game or movie. In each of these cases, the rights of the creator of the original image must be considered, as well as those of the creator of the derivative work.

While the image description page states the source and copyright status of the derivative work, it only names the creator of the original work without specifying the status of their copyright over the work.

Wikipedia takes copyright very seriously. It may be deleted soon, unless we can determine the license and the source of the original image. If you know this information, then you can add a copyright tag to the image description page.

If you have uploaded other derivative works, consider checking that you have specified their license and tagged them, too. You can find a list of files you have created in your upload log.

If you have any questions, please feel free to ask them at the media copyright questions page. If the file is already gone, you can still make a request for undeletion and ask for a chance to fix the problem. Thanks again for your cooperation. Kelly ^hi! 15:30, 9 May 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Ulman1.png

The file File:Ulman1.png has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Redundant to/superseded by File:Ulman2.png

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 18:29, 30 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]