User talk:Susiedarling

June 2013

Hello, I'm Pratyya Ghosh. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Sue Bredekamp because it did not appear constructive. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Pratyya ^(Hello!) 11:50, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I noticed you blanked the article with no explanation - I've gone ahead and WP:PRODded the article for deletion, since it doesn't have any appropriate sources. For your future reference, Wikipedia:Deletion policy explains how to go about deleting articles which you think might be inappropriate for an encyclopedia. --McGeddon (talk) 12:38, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Making points

Looking at your edits, I see that you've blanked some improperly sourced material in response to someone deleting your own on the same article, and have now dropped Sue Bredekamp from a list (after blanking her article), when someone reverted a name you added to that same list because the person didn't have an article.

Please don't disrupt Wikipedia to make a point. If there's a problem with your edit and you can't fix it, either ask for help, or leave it alone. --McGeddon (talk) 12:48, 14 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

July 2014

Hello, I'm AsceticRose. I wanted to let you know that I undid one or more of your recent contributions to Scouting and Guiding in Australia because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. AsceticRosé 15:13, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Susiedarling, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome!

A more personal welcome

Susiedarling - you somehow missed out on a formal welcome when you began editing here, so I've placed one above. But from me now, informally, welcome, especially to someone who seems to know a bit about Scouting.

But there's one rule that you need to know about, particularly in regard to your editing at Scouts Australia. New content must be reliably sourced. That material you added about Charles Smethurst Snow must have a citation attached pointing all readers at the secondary source(s) that tell us all about him. It's no good just telling us in an Edit summary that sources exist. So,can you please add a source? HiLo48 (talk) 22:17, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

What are you up to? HiLo is totally correct. You need to add a source, but you just reverted his change. You then totally blanked Scouting and Guiding in Australia, the kind of general article that exists for every country. Why? --Bduke (Discussion) 23:26, 21 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Snow

Hello, Susiedarling. You have new messages at DoctorJoeE's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

Talkback

Hello, Susiedarling. You have new messages at AsceticRose's talk page.
Message added 16:08, 22 July 2014 (UTC). You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Charles Smethurst Snow (September 27)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Charles Smethurst Snow and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Mjs1991 (talk) 02:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Susiedarling, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering or curious about why your article submission was declined please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Mjs1991 (talk) 02:01, 27 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

January 2015

Welcome to Wikipedia. At least one of your recent edits, such as the edit you made to Child advocacy, did not appear to be constructive and has been reverted or removed. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at the welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make some test edits, please use the sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page.Your recent edits have been disruptive. First, adding 3200+ characters to an article is hardly minor, which is exactly what you called it in your edit summary. If you want to be taken seriously, don't lie to your fellow editors, with whom you must collaborate. When an addition you have made to an article is removed, the proper thing to do is start a discussion on the article talk page, not just put it back. See WP:BRD. Additionally, everything you added to the article was unreferenced. Everything in Wikipedia must be verifiable to reliable secondary sources. That does not mean every word has to be referenced, but certainly 3200 characters worth of words do. The editor that removed your edit was perfectly within his rights to do so and lastly, your note to the editor that did so was out of line. I will leave you some links which may help you understand how Wikipedia works, and a link to a place where newer editors can ask questions to clarify whatever they do not understand. John from Idegon (talk) 23:03, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome

Welcome to Wikipedia! Listed below are some brief introductions containing all the basics needed to use, comment on, and contribute to Wikipedia.

Main Introduction – What is Wikipedia?
The Five Pillars – What are the principles behind Wikipedia?
Quick Introductions to:

Policies and guidelines – How does Wikipedia actually work?
Talk pages – How do I communicate in Wikipedia?
Referencing – How do I add sources to articles?
Uploading images – How do I add and use images?
Navigating Wikipedia – How do I find my way around?

What Wikipedia is not - even though everyone can edit it, Wikipedia is still an encyclopedia.

If you want to know more about a specific subject, Help:Help explains how to navigate the help pages.

Where next?

If you wish to express an opinion or make a comment, Where to ask questions will point you in the correct direction.
If you would like to edit an article, the Basic tutorial will show you how, and How to help will give you some ideas for things to edit.
If you would like to create a new article, Starting an article will explain how to create a new page, with tips for success and a link to Wikipedia's Article Wizard, which can guide you through the process of submitting a new article to Wikipedia.
For more support and some friendly contacts to get you started, the Editors' Welcome page should be your next stop!

Welcome to Wikipedia: check out the Teahouse!

Hello! Susiedarling, you are invited to the Teahouse, a forum on Wikipedia for new editors to ask questions about editing Wikipedia, and get support from peers and experienced editors. Please join us! John from Idegon (talk) 23:04, 25 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Charles Smethurst Snow

Hello, Susiedarling. It has been over six months since you last edited your Articles for Creation draft article submission, "Charles Smethurst Snow".

In accordance with our policy that Articles for Creation is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}} or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. JMHamo (talk) 17:35, 13 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]