User talk:Suruena

If you're here to respond to a comment I posted on your talk page, feel free to reply on your talk page (so the question and answer are together). I ALWAYS watch talk pages I've posted comments to for a while. If you leave me a message, I'll respond here unless you ask me not to.

Archives

El Señor Presidente

Hi there, could you please take a look here? We are wondering why the language templates were added. Thanks! :) Acer (talk) 13:10, 5 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for Image:Belenix logo.png

Thanks for uploading Image:Belenix logo.png. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 01:09, 22 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]

CfD nomination of Category:Myst characters

I have nominated Category:Myst characters (edit | talk | history | links | watch | logs) for deletion. Your opinions on the matter are welcome; please participate in the discussion by adding your comments at the discussion page. Thank you. Judgesurreal777 (talk) 22:33, 5 June 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free media (Image:DNG tm.png)

Thanks for uploading Image:DNG tm.png. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:07, 23 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

This edit moved the picture of Bradman in 1928 so that it now clashes with the section break, which I believe is something that is strongly discouraged in FAs. --Dweller (talk) 08:30, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, I was following WP:ACCESS: the image if for 1928 and therefore it belongs to the "First-class debut" section. It's important that each image is located in the adequate section (and not just above the heading of that section), otherwise a wikipedian using a text-only browser or a screen reader won't notice it, and image captions are also part of the article. That's the reason for my change, do you think it's valid? —surueña 08:39, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

OK, fair enough. I've hacked a good version by extending the text. Howzat? --Dweller (talk) 08:59, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

All right, thanks for your interest. Cheers, —surueña 09:22, 27 August 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Fair use rationale for File:AdaCore (logo).jpg

Thanks for uploading File:AdaCore (logo).jpg. You've indicated that the image meets Wikipedia's criteria for non-free content, but there is no explanation of why it meets those criteria. Please go to the image description page and edit it to include a fair use rationale. If you have any questions, please post them at Wikipedia:Media copyright questions.

Thank you for your cooperation. NOTE: once you correct this, please remove the tag from the image's page. STBotI (talk) 15:31, 28 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Done, thanks —surueña 09:18, 29 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

accessibility

hello Suruenya ,

I'm a user with , disabilities, and liked your entries on the accessibility project page.

could you tell me how to change what is called the "skin" I think, so the pages become less bright and easier to read?. Sometimes the white brightness somehow overstimulates my brain and triggers migraine headaches, and generally makes it harder for me to use wiki media as much as I'd like.

furthermore I have RSI, and feel hounded because of it by some administrators [in their ignorance I dare hope]. Just have a look at wiki accessibility project page, and I think you will know, what I mean. do you kno where in wiki PDia one can address this? [Sins recently I'm dealing with an imperfect speech recognition system, before, or without it, I can only type shorthand, In short phrases].

[I still have to semi-manually edit my writings; I tryd to pick up most mistakes, but since my hands are hurting more now, I am gone leave it with this, without editing to perfection I mean, in the hope you understand]

Once again, Thank you for the informative entries you've made and shared, and I look forwards very much so to your reply! Sven 70--史凡 (talk) 06:12, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Sven70, I can understand your text without problems, don't worry. The best place to handle your problems is at the Wikipedia:WikiProject Accessibility (probably you already know about it). To use another wikipedia skin you must go to your preferences page (the link between your talk page and your watchlist), a select one at the skin tab. But I'm afraid that all those skins are as bright as the default one. However, a user can customize his own style sheet, changing for example the text & background colors, the fonts sizes... Sadly, I'm not an expert on this, but if you know some HTML you should edit your http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Sven70/monobook.css page. See for example http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/User:Wolfgangbeyer/monobook.css which is adjusted for color blind wikipedians.

This issue regarding skins for specific disabilities was raised previously at Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Accessibility. I suggests you to discuss this again in a new section, because people much more knowlegeable than me about this could guide you how to solve your specific problem about custom wikipedia skins. Please, don't hesitate to contact me again about this or other topics. Cheers, —surueña 18:40, 28 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Dear suruenya, would you mind picking up my answer on Onorem's talk page? You will also see there the reason why I have to stop now using the computer. Apart from that, I intend to send you a specific response in the near future, the next days or so I guess. Thanks for your understanding and your nice nice, kind and informative reply, on top of that given to me in a very speedy way!!! Sven 70, or Esbel as my former landlady in Valladolid used to write on my milk in the common fridge LOL! thank you once again!!--史凡 (talk) 11:58, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, back from the local carefour, a bit dizzy, but without an overt headache, let alone migraine, touch wood! -- what I meant was, how to have this nice light blue background color like on your talk page, Onorem has the same, if I could have the black letters on such background instead of the bright white1 when reading the various wiki media, that that would seem to make such a Big difference!thank you for caring!--史凡 (talk) 15:53, 29 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

PS after a whole three weeks trying, I finally figured out, asking local people, how to reduce the physical brightness of my computer and TV screen, this after five years living in this part of the world, studying the local language all the time, incredible no?!

Hi again! I read your discussion with Onorem, it's good to know that thanks to a speech recognition software you can better participate in the Wikipedia. Surely, your experience and contributions are very valuable for the Accessibility WikiProject, not just for people with disabilities but for everybody.
But I am puzzled with respect your comment about the light blue background of my user page. I must admit that I don't see any difference with the background of other pages or articles, nor I did any change in the colors. Which web browser are you using, Microsoft Internet Explorer?
Anyway, if I understand correctly you want to change the background of all Wikipedia articles to improve readability, not changing the background of your user page, am I right? In that case, I suggest you to view the following Wikipedia skins with a darker background:

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Sb-scr.png

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:SFRGreen_skin.png

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Wfm_monoclassic_screenshot.png

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Simpleskin.png

http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/File:Mytheme.png

Tell me if any of them improves readability for you, and I can help you to change the skin of Wikipedia or other Wikimedia projects like Wiktionary. Cheers! PS: I'm not a woman, actually I'm a guy... :-) —surueña 20:02, 30 January 2009 (UTC)

me and names, I went by the final a to assume that your name implies femininity/female gender, so sorry [I once had a female Spanish friend in Saarbrücken, whose name was Charo, which puzzled me; I think it whas shorts for Rosario, the --o remaining though though; another variant of hername was chari, only adding to my confusion, though. I guess the --I is gender neutral, but once again sorry for my mistake!

[Being by things Spanish, well, if Katalan can be included in that huh, not that I feel very strongly about that, though in Belgium I would prefer Flanders to be independent, already and mainly because he Flemish institutions have shown to me that they work in a citizen friendly manner, where as the Belgian ones, the people who work there think they're in paradise havings used their political connections shrewdly, and instead of a service attitude to other Belgian people, say in embassies and consulates, me being where I am having to depend on thst, one gets treated like dirt and a nuisance, point out people pay taxes for them to work there, one gets a semi-clever reply like "you are paying my salary?" [Happened in Beijing, including me being asked in to leave leave, in my own embassy, how dare they, including some senior people been telling me I'd better be on the good side of the guy was giving me a hard time, since he would be solely responsible for dealing with passport matters, like in telling me to get on a plane flight to Belgium, and take care of my new passport application over there{my old one had run out of pages}, I mean can you believe that?? And complaints procedures, and good old-fashioned traditional way, they would be hidden, like in "complaint procedures?, what complaint procedures?! -- funny in Fawlty Towers, like some of the stuff I experience on a dailybases in Taiwan, but not in reality, I assure you.

Back to my Catalan question:why does the rest of Spain, or is it just the Andalusians who have worked there, referred to the Catalans as"Polish/polacas"?? Asking Catalans themselves lead to similar reactions as with asking Taiwanese about Taiwanese things, that is at most embarrassment, after which one is still none the wiser--, so I thought I'd might ask you shy smiley.

Back to background color: I had a look at the links you provided, and they all seem to be an improvement; I seem to prefer the blue one with the wiki PDia mountain like symbol on it, or is it a drop falling in the ocean, not sure -- the one with white letters on a black background seems pretty revolutionary; it would be so good to be able to talk with actual users and to learn from their experiences; I'm a bit hesitant to go for the white letters one for now, also it says Meta wiki, does that mean it is not available yet?

I'm using Opera Web browser for now, and I have been wondering whether my speech recognition software actually doesn't like this brouser very much, as most of the time I'm typing into masks, which are in the end displayed by Opera.

Your user page, as displayed on my computer, has the said light blue background; the boxes to the left, like the toolbox, still have white background as I see it from here,; the whole media as displayed on my computerhave this very white backgrounds that usually causes me headaches...

I hope I covered the points you ask me, apart from the additional Spanish references. I provided; if I forgot something crucial, please get back to me and ask! [I better stop now dictating I better stop now dictating, even with the brightness turned on its lowest, when I close my eyes. There is still a bothering imprint there on my retina, I guess]

Thanks again, both of you for all the help already offered!!!219.69.81.128 (talk) 03:53, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

wiki project accessibility

hello suruenya,. I checked the link you gave me, but that is the very page I was talking about, and where another user/admin on the discussion page took down my RSI- user box; I noticed there has hardly been any activity sins 6m or so-- is the project still going on? do you know what's happening with it?thanks in advance, Sven 70--史凡 (talk) 06:48, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, the project is still alive, probably all the activity has been moved to the WP:ACCESS page. Have you considered being a member of this Wikiproject? Cheers, —surueña 20:05, 30 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I found it; only, WP access doesn't seem to be interactive -- believe it or not, believe it or not,, I put my name up as a member only to be deleted by an administrator, just go to the history of wiki project accessibility , I think it was in December, see the four modifications by Sven 70? Cthe user just after me? That's right, he took my name of, and also got rid of the RSI user boxes I made -- I find it hard to believe or explain such behavior, is RSI still an unknown entity? Is it known but considered a hoax and malingering? I can say from my very first hand experience just how crippling and invalidating it is, as I've heard already before from other people in Australia.

That I used shorthand before the speech recognition never seems to have judged upon its merit, mainly a disabled person going through pain trying to communicate, but instead led to mocking, labeling as stupid and disruptive. Such has been very disheartening. It is only with Onorem, and now with you, that things took a turn for the better, for which thank you very much!!

[Can you believe even I think a disabled person herself gave me additionally a hard time just because she feels strongly about spelling taken from her user page? Me who thought wiki PDia be about something like Enlightenment and such, came in for a cold shower in the beginning,. So once again thank you both so much for showing something better!!

PS to have my speech recognition working reasonably, for now I have to restart my computer each and every time I want to use it; so I'm gone leave the editing of my own writings with this for now, as I already lose some so much time every time, also since I have to do my dictating during the best time of my day learning wise, that is mornings, where as during da part of the day I'm more communicative, that is afternoon and evenings, I don't dictate for the very reason that struggling around with the computer and the software would drive me crazy then, then the choice is easily made to hang in front of the TVs for a footie game with a dictionary instead.

If anything is unclear, please tell me, I will be more than willing to clarify anything! Thank you once again and see above219.69.81.128 (talk) 02:58, 31 January 2009 (UTC)[reply]

did the layout of talk and user pages change?

or am I confusing it with the layout from wictionary? at least there one goes straight to the talk page, and you can use the history button to immediately see whether there was an answer or not史凡 (talk) 14:40, 5 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

did the general layout of wiki PDia change?

noW. I have to click even more, and certain things,. Like directly go to your talk page, I don't manage at all; sins its headache- season again, I hope I manage to get that blue background soon. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 史凡 (talk • contribs) 04:45, 10 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Alonsomania

A proposed deletion template has been added to the article Alonsomania, suggesting that it be deleted according to the proposed deletion process because of the following concern:

Not notable, not neutral, completely unsourced and original research.

All contributions are appreciated, but this article may not satisfy Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and the deletion notice should explain why (see also "What Wikipedia is not" and Wikipedia's deletion policy). You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why you disagree with the proposed deletion in your edit summary or on its talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised because, even though removing the deletion notice will prevent deletion through the proposed deletion process, the article may still be deleted if it matches any of the speedy deletion criteria or it can be sent to Articles for Deletion, where it may be deleted if consensus to delete is reached. Readro (talk) 18:15, 28 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

NowCommons: File:AdaCore (logo).jpg

File:AdaCore (logo).jpg is now available on Wikimedia Commons as Commons:File:AdaCore (logo).jpg. This is a repository of free media that can be used on all Wikimedia wikis. The image will be deleted from Wikipedia, but this doesn't mean it can't be used anymore. You can embed an image uploaded to Commons like you would an image uploaded to Wikipedia, in this case: [[File:AdaCore (logo).jpg]]. Note that this is an automated message to inform you about the move. This bot did not copy the image itself. --Erwin85Bot (talk) 00:47, 27 May 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Articles for deletion nomination of High-risk heterosexual

I have nominated High-risk heterosexual, an article that you created, for deletion. I do not think that this article satisfies Wikipedia's criteria for inclusion, and have explained why at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/High-risk heterosexual. Your opinions on the matter are welcome at that same discussion page; also, you are welcome to edit the article to address these concerns. Thank you for your time.

Please contact me if you're unsure why you received this message. -- Alexandr Dmitri (Александр Дмитрий) (talk) 22:18, 12 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite manual

Template:Cite manual has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. -— Gadget850 (Ed) ^talk 10:07, 21 May 2010 (UTC)[reply]

You are now a Reviewer

Hello. Your account has been granted the "reviewer" userright, allowing you to review other users' edits on certain flagged pages. Pending changes, also known as flagged protection, is currently undergoing a two-month trial scheduled to end 15 August 2010.

Reviewers can review edits made by users who are not autoconfirmed to articles placed under pending changes. Pending changes is applied to only a small number of articles, similarly to how semi-protection is applied but in a more controlled way for the trial. The list of articles with pending changes awaiting review is located at Special:OldReviewedPages.

When reviewing, edits should be accepted if they are not obvious vandalism or BLP violations, and not clearly problematic in light of the reason given for protection (see Wikipedia:Reviewing process). More detailed documentation and guidelines can be found here.

If you do not want this userright, you may ask any administrator to remove it for you at any time. Courcelles (talk) 17:36, 19 June 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Ada and PD-US

Hi, there is a discussion at s:Wikisource:Scriptorium#Ada_and_PD-US that you may be interested it. --John Vandenberg ^(chat) 09:58, 16 November 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Template:Lang-leet

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Template:Lang-leet, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. — SMcCandlish Talk⇒ ɖ∘¿¤þ Contrib. 12:02, 1 March 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Info: vote for federation or confederation

Hello. Information: on the discussion page of European Union exist voting: Talk:European_Union#Definition_of_the_European_Union. Subtropical-man (talk) 20:22, 10 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Re the Template:Scientific method you recently created.

Please see Wikipedia:No original research/Noticeboard#Template:Scientific method AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:31, 26 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

(Note: I have also raised the issue at Wikipedia:Fringe theories/Noticeboard. AndyTheGrump (talk) 20:35, 26 September 2012 (UTC) )[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Scientific method

Template:Scientific method has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. IRWolfie- (talk) 22:28, 28 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Cite manual

Template:Cite manual has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. — Gadget850 (Ed)^talk 12:55, 1 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Lostpedia

Template:Lostpedia has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:49, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Discussion about collapsing music track lists

There is a discussion about whether the track lists for Music of the SaGa series should be collapsed in the article at Talk:Music_of_the_SaGa_series#Collapsed_sections. Please visit the talk page and take a few moments to share your feedback on this issue. --Jax 0677 (talk) 00:22, 22 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Shibboleth (computer security)

The article Shibboleth (computer security) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Content Fork in 2006, unreferenced before and after move. Still unreferenced. No substantial edits since creation. Google search returns nothing except for Shibboleth (Internet2) which already has a page. Not able to merge, no refs and no potential refs returned during Google searches.

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. Ggpur (talk) 02:07, 31 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited DO-254, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page COTS. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 14:19, 17 September 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:53, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Suruena. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Suruena. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:INTA logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:INTA logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:42, 23 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Suruena. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

15232 listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect 15232. Since you had some involvement with the 15232 redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. Steel1943 (talk) 23:28, 15 February 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:19, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

"Gnu ld" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Gnu ld. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 February 22#Gnu ld until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Somerandomuser (talk) 21:14, 22 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Shen Long GA Reassessment

Sheng Long, an article that you or your project may be interested in, has been nominated for an individual good article reassessment. If you are interested in the discussion, please participate by adding your comments to the reassessment page. If concerns are not addressed during the review period, the good article status may be removed from the article.--Whiteguru (talk) 03:37, 11 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:06, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Rtl-lang

Template:Rtl-lang has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page.----Ineffablebookkeeper (talk) ({{ping}} me!) 16:21, 24 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Portal:European Union/Potals" listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has identified a potential problem with the redirect Portal:European Union/Potals and has thus listed it for discussion. This discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2022 September 24#Portal:European Union/Potals until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. – Jonesey95 (talk) 15:17, 24 September 2022 (UTC)[reply]

"Alonsomania" listed at Redirects for discussion

The redirect Alonsomania has been listed at redirects for discussion to determine whether its use and function meets the redirect guidelines. Anyone, including you, is welcome to comment on this redirect at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2023 August 5 § Alonsomania until a consensus is reached. TartarTorte 19:56, 5 August 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of TACPOL (programming language)

The article TACPOL (programming language) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

This fails WP: N. I can't find any sources about TACPOL that aren't affiliated with the US Army (i.e. any independent sources).

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. HyperAccelerated (talk) 00:11, 21 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]