User talk:SuperBB93

April 2023

Hello. This is a message to let you know that one or more of your recent contributions, such as the edit(s) you made to La casa de los famosos (season 3), did not appear to be constructive and have been reverted. Please take some time to familiarise yourself with our policies and guidelines. You can find information about these at our welcome page which also provides further information about contributing constructively to this encyclopedia. If you only meant to make test edits, please use your sandbox for that. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you may leave a message on my talk page. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 03:40, 25 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

March 2024

Please do not remove content or templates from pages on Wikipedia, as you did at La casa de los famosos (season 3), without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use your sandbox for that. Thank you. Telenovelafan215 (talk) 23:15, 11 March 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Bailando 2023 (April 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reasons left by KylieTastic were:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

This draft's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article. In summary, the draft needs multiple published sources that are:

in-depth (not just passing mentions about the subject)
reliable
secondary
independent of the subject

Make sure you add references that meet these criteria before resubmitting. Learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Bailando 2023 and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

KylieTastic (talk) 10:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, SuperBB93! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! KylieTastic (talk) 10:38, 9 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

May 2024

Hello, I'm Telenovelafan215. An edit that you recently made to La casa de los famosos Colombia seemed to be a test and has been reverted. If you want to practice editing, please use your sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks! Telenovelafan215 (talk) 02:30, 26 May 2024 (UTC)[reply]

please use edit summaries

Hello. I have noticed that you often edit without using an edit summary. Please do your best to always fill in the summary field. This helps your fellow editors use their time more productively, rather than spending it unnecessarily scrutinizing and verifying your work. Even a short summary is better than no summary, and summaries are particularly important for large, complex, or potentially controversial edits. To help yourself remember, you may wish to check the "prompt me when entering a blank edit summary" box in your preferences. Thanks! -- Mikeblas (talk) 14:00, 4 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tulsi Gabbard

Hello, I'm GRuban. I wanted to let you know that some of your recent contributions to Tulsi Gabbard have been reverted or removed because they seem to be defamatory or libellous. Take a look at our welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia. Thank you. --GRuban (talk) 14:21, 26 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

September 2024

Did you really just do this? Anything else like that and you can expect your account to be blocked from editing. Paul Erik ^{(talk)(contribs)} 02:39, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 19

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Soccer on CBS Sports, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Kate Scott. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 07:56, 19 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]