Jump to content

User talk:Sunholm

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
This user's unblock request has been reviewed by an administrator, who declined the request. Other administrators may also review this block, but should not override the decision without good reason (see the blocking policy).

Sunholm (block logactive blocksglobal blockscontribsdeleted contribsfilter logcreation logchange block settingsunblockcheckuser (log))


Request reason:

I have contacted two ArbCom members via email and I will never vandalise again. This account will not be shared again, either. My previous userpages were an attempt at impersonating another Wikipedian who doesn't edit here much. This was on all sockpuppet accounts. If someone responds, I hope it is an ArbCom members. A full apology to:

I don't find vandalism fun anymore, and haven't edited since February when I was indefblock as Solumeiras. This is a genuine apology. I just want to be good now, I've been a bloody idiot and anyway, if I want to behave like I did in the past I now know there are other wikis which will accept this kind of behaviour. I am really sorry,and have taken the ban appeal to ArbCom. (Jpgordon and FT2 know about this)

Decline reason:

The matter is currently being discussed privately. Pending the conclusion of that discussion, I see no point in unblocking you. MaxSem(Han shot first!) 10:38, 19 May 2008 (UTC)[reply]


If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.

Previous accounts:

and sockpuppets found via 82.42.237.114

no more disruption from me, I want to help now. I've been a bloody idiot

Nomination for deletion of Template:Pinktulip

[edit]

Template:Pinktulip has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. KATMAKROFAN (talk) 03:30, 24 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]