User talk:Spiderjerky/archive1

Welcome!

Hello, Spiderjerky, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! 115ash^→(☏) 14:27, 23 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Redirects

You forgot the anchors. For example, Virginia State Route 112 (1965) should go to List of primary state highways in Virginia shorter than one mile#SR 112. --NE2 08:38, 7 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:1897 by day

Category:1897 by day, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Fram (talk) 07:15, 22 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Moths of Cameroon

Category:Moths of Cameroon, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kkmurray (talk) 02:02, 6 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Leeds United categories

There's a much quicker and easier way - WP:AWB. Giant Snowman 20:37, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

It's fine, I'm running AWB and I've only got 311 articles to go... Giant Snowman 20:43, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

My list is alphabetical by first name (currently at 'Bobby'...) - if you want to continue at the back end we can meet in the middle? Giant Snowman 20:46, 17 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

New Zealand general elections

Thanks for setting up the various categories for general elections. The job is not quite finished, though, and the following should also happen:

the category 'New Zealand general elections' and 'yyyy elections in New Zealand' should be removed from the election article, as you have rightfully added those categories to the new 'New Zealand general election, yyyy' category
the category 'yyyy in New Zealand' should be removed from the election article, as it is already in 'yyyy elections in New Zealand', i.e. one of its parent categories.

I have done these changes for the New Zealand general election, 1946 article. Will you be so kind and go back and tidy up the other categories that you have created? Schwede 66 18:07, 20 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for November 26

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Mihai Cotovanu, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Romanian. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 13:01, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Atheistic existentialism

Thank you for moving the articles in "Category:Atheist existentialism" to this category – I was just about to start this task, so it was nice to realize it'd already been done. Best wishes, Sardanaphalus (talk) 22:12, 26 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Sockpuppets

Hello. I'd like to see your defence for creating this category. Maybe you'd like to nominate it for deletion to save me deleting it all. Thanks. -- zzuuzz ^(talk) 15:01, 10 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your experience with Wikipedia so far

Welcome to Wikipedia! I am conducting a quick survey about newcomer support and I would like to hear about your experience so far. Your response will go a long way to help us build a better experience for newcomers like yourself. The survey will take you around 10 minutes to complete.

To learn more about the study, visit this link: http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Co-op

To take the survey, visit this link: https://syracuseuniversity.qualtrics.com/SE/?SID=SV_2bnPZz0HelBaY85

Thanks!

Gabrielm199 (talk) 20:21, 19 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

School redirect

Hi Spiderjerky, Just wanted to say thanks for redirect the article to the correct destination [1],
Have absolutely no idea how the hell I ended up buggering it up but yeah thanks much appreciated :),
–Davey2010^Talk 00:19, 23 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template categories

Hi, I see you've created a large number of categories such as Category:Immediate step-children/Ophiusini and populated them with templates. Was there any discussion prior to the creation of these categories ? Wikipedia categories that are for templates normally include a reference to templates in the category name; if the categories were to be renamed how do you think they should be named ? Is there an article that explains what "step-children" means in the context of taxonomy ? DexDor (talk) 08:04, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@DexDor: I spend a lot of my time on here wikignoming on Special:WantedCategories and those types of taxonomy categories pop up a lot (20-30 every 500 entries or so). There were already thousands of preexisting categories in that mold (Immediate step-children) when I started (for example, Category:Immediate step-children/Tawa, which was created in 2012 and not by me), so I assumed that it was acceptable for me to create them. They were already populated when I created them; that wasn't me. I know there wasn't any discussion over these types of categories but I was just following someone else's work. If I violated any rules I apologize. spiderjerky (talk) 17:38, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks - that explains why you've been creating so many categories! Editors shouldn't really place a redlink category on a page (without immediately creating the category and hence turning the link blue) so I'd be wary of creating a category to fix a redlink without checking that it's an appropriate category. Another way that redlink categories can occur is if an article is restored to an earlier version and a category has been deleted/renamed (and this isn't fixed). These categories should also probably be categorized under Category:Biology templates. I've asked User:Dinoguy2 about these taxonomy templates/categories. DexDor (talk) 18:10, 28 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:West Greece

Hi, I noticed that you fixed a huge number of articles in the Category:West Greece tree that was moved to Category:Western Greece. I just wanted you to know that this manual cleanup work is not really necessary as User:RussBot automatically executes this task for us every morning at 9:15 am. So unless you go through all these long lists manually for having the categories fixed now instead of tomorrow morning, then you might want to save your time for other tasks requiring all our human competences... ;-)
Thanks anyway, --PanchoS (talk) 17:57, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@PanchoS: Yes, I am aware of RussBot's existence, but there isn't that much that my human competency is good at, since I mostly do category work and am not good with actual articles. Also, I actually enjoy moving all those pages and categories (I don't know why, I just do), and I'm paranoid that somewhere someone is looking at an empty category. Thanks for letting me know, though, and I'll stop if you want me to. spiderjerky (talk) 18:05, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No, if you like to fix them right away, don't let me stop you... I just wanted to make sure you do know about RussBot's existence, and if you do, then it's totally up to you. I just don't believe you can't help with article work at all. There are so many little to large tasks that won't be done by a bot. Cleaning up infoboxes for example (formatting, legacy or missing parameters, inconsistencies etc.). That might be extraordinary helpful. But as I said, it's up to you, and either way your work is valuable... Regards, --PanchoS (talk) 18:16, 3 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Kenya Wikipedia administration

Category:Kenya Wikipedia administration, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. DexDor (talk) 06:59, 9 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A cookie for you!

Thanks muchly for your help in providing a proper formating of the translated citation in [Gaza Breach Explosion] - much appreciated Erictheenquirer (talk) 09:25, 25 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Conference season categories

Hi Spiderjerky. Unfortunately the editor that moved the Football Conference article and related categories had done so a bit too soon - the renaming isn't due to happen for a couple of months. As a result, I'm about to rollback all your category renames. Cheers, Number 5 7 15:23, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Number 57:Dang it. Sorry about that. spiderjerky (talk) 15:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

No problem, not your fault! Number 5 7 15:25, 6 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Thanks for moving the Toronto Olympians players to the new category. It was late and I was exhausted and didn't have the strength to continue editing. I really appreciate it saved me some time. Thanks again my Brother in Christ and God bless. (talk)

OS sheet numbers

Is there any particular reason you recently removed the sheet numbers from a bunch of articles citing OS 1:50 000 maps? You didn't give an edit summary, and without the sheet number it makes it harder to either a) wander into Waterstones and have a look, or b) search through one's own collection to check a building or other geographic feature really does exist. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:39, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333: I've been cleaning out Category:Pages with citations using unsupported parameters and |sheet= is unsupported. I really don't know anything about cartography but all of the URLs I've seen have pointed to single maps, so I thought it was unnecessary. You seem to know about the subject so I'll defer to you, but I would appreciate it if supported parameters are used. Sorry. spiderjerky (talk) 17:42, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ah, okay. This is why it's good to do an edit summary - something like "removing unsupported parameter 'sheet'" would be a good choice. Very briefly the Ordnance Survey are the flagship map provider in the UK, and they are particularly good for geographic features such as contours, mud and sand, footpaths and things Google Maps just never seem to bother with. Traditionally, each one in the series is known as "sheets". Anyway, I think you can change each instance of "|sheet=x" to "|id=sheet x" and I've done that for the two that are on my watchlist (Dartford Crossing and Mersea Island) - do you know what other articles you fixed? We can probably do the same for all of them. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 17:52, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Ritchie333:That makes sense, thanks. And I try to leave edit summaries but I edit really fast so I forget a lot. I think I fixed them all, but citation 103 on Marcellus Formation might be a little weird. spiderjerky (talk) 18:06, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Not sure about Marcellus Formation, you'll have to ask someone else I'm afraid. However, there is no deadline! I know there's lots of work to do around here, but if you edit too quickly you'll make mistakes, and if you're editing good articles (which the three mentioned so far are) in this manner, you might get told off (as any edit that stops the article being fully factually accurate and verifiable to sources on a GA could be considered disruptive). So just slow down a bit, and remember to use a good edit summary at all times. Ritchie333 ^(talk) ^(cont) 18:24, 17 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Spiderrjerky could you please check that the dates for the refs. on 2 pages are all OK 1) Martineau family 2) Family of Catherine Duchess of Cambridge Thanks so much Mike — Preceding unsigned comment added by 121.214.119.18 (talk) 01:18, 16 May 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Cactusjackbangbang

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of Cactusjackbangbang, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Kelly ^hi! 00:32, 11 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:08, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Changing Microsoft Hardware to Accessories

What was the logic behind changing Holographic, Surface and Lumia to accessories when they're stand alone products? Zero Serenity ^{(talk - contributions)} 07:31, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Zero Serenity: The category formerly known as Microsoft hardware had been moved to Category:Microsoft accessories and I was moving the pages to the new category. I didn't even read the pages so sorry if I screwed up. spiderjerky (talk) 16:11, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I just looked at the category history. I'm gonna have to fix this up today. Zero Serenity ^{(talk - contributions)} 16:54, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Zero Serenity: Apologies for any inconvenience I may have perpetuated. spiderjerky (talk) 17:07, 3 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Template Gribovsky aircraft listed at Redirects for discussion

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template Gribovsky aircraft. Since you had some involvement with the Template Gribovsky aircraft redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you have not already done so. Stefan2 (talk) 20:30, 16 June 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Hannover S-Bahn stations

Thanks for cleaning up after my category page move. I should have been more thorough myself. MikeLynch (talk) 19:32, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@MikeLynch: Happy to do it! I'm stuck in a boring class so thanks for giving me something to do. spiderjerky (talk) 19:33, 14 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Anaheim Hills redirects

Hello Spiderjerky. I have removed protection from several of these redirects, so you should be able to edit them yourself now. Best regards — Martin (MSGJ · talk) 08:50, 28 September 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Soccer clubs

Happy to be of help. I used the Cat-a-Lot script; it makes stuff like that so much easier to do. I can't recommend it highly enough.

Keep up the good work, and happy editing! --Ser Amantio di Nicolao^{Che dicono a Signa?}_{Lo dicono a Signa.} 04:54, 28 October 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Cut and Paste moves

Hi, and thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. It appears that you tried to give Washington Huskies volleyball team a different title by copying its content and pasting either the same content, or an edited version of it, into Washington Huskies women's volleyball. This is known as a "cut-and-paste move", and it is undesirable because it splits the page history, which is legally required for attribution. Instead, the software used by Wikipedia has a feature that allows pages to be moved to a new title together with their edit history.

In most cases, once your account is four days old and has ten edits, you should be able to move an article yourself using the "Move" tab at the top of the page (the tab may be hidden in a dropdown menu for you). This both preserves the page history intact and automatically creates a redirect from the old title to the new. If you cannot perform a particular page move yourself this way (e.g. because a page already exists at the target title), please follow the instructions at requested moves to have it moved by someone else. Also, if there are any other pages that you moved by copying and pasting, even if it was a long time ago, please list them at Wikipedia:Requests for history merge. Thank you. UW Dawgs (talk) 23:25, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@UW Dawgs: sorry about that, I had a feeling I'd get a message like this as soon as I copy pasted. won't happen again in the future, and I'll use requested moves to standardize the page as soon as I have access to my computer again. spiderjerky (talk) 23:32, 3 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Changing Category:Jacksonville Suns players to Category:Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp players

I've noticed you're removing Category:Jacksonville Suns players and adding Category:Jacksonville Jumbo Shrimp players on player pages. None of those players have played for the "Jumbo Shrimp", but have played for the "Suns". Furthermore, the Suns category (that someone else moved) should not have been moved in the first place. Instead, a separate "Jumbo Shrimp" category should have been created for players who will play on that team when it begins play in April 2017. NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:37, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@NatureBoyMD: ah shoot by bad, I thought it was standard procedure to put players in the category for the current team name regardless. Give me a sec and I'll fix it! spiderjerky (talk) 19:38, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

No worries. Team name changes can be confusing. Some articles stay the same, some need changing, others need to be created. NatureBoyMD (talk) 19:41, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Sally Kellerman has been nominated for discussion

Category:Sally Kellerman, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. --Starcheerspeaksnewslostwars^{Talk to me} 21:40, 7 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:WikiProject United States/The 50,000 Challenge

You are invited to participate in the 50,000 Challenge, aiming for 50,000 article improvements and creations for articles relating to the United States. This effort began on November 1, 2016 and to reach our goal, we will need editors like you to participate, expand, and create. See more here!

--MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:39, 8 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Spiderjerky. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hyperwallet

Hi Spiderjerky,

While doing new page patrolling, I found Hyperwallet, which seems to be about the same as it was when you userified it. Just thought you might want to know. --Slashme (talk) 20:15, 29 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BethNaught has been nominated for discussion

Category:Suspected Wikipedia sockpuppets of BethNaught, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BethNaught (talk) 15:16, 26 February 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Tulsa Golden Hurricane women's volleyball

A tag has been placed on Category:Tulsa Golden Hurricane women's volleyball requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 07:33, 16 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Medal "For the Victory over Germany in the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945" has been nominated for discussion

Category:Recipients of the Medal "For the Victory over Germany in the Great Patriotic War 1941–1945", which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:40, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Recipients of the Medal "For the Defence of the Caucasus" has been nominated for discussion

Category:Recipients of the Medal "For the Defence of the Caucasus", which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. BrownHairedGirl (talk) • (contribs) 16:46, 19 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:East Tennessee State Buccaneers men's basketball players

Why did you create this category? The men's team is known as Buccaneers, and the women's team is known as the Lady Buccaneers. It's a long established naming convention to drop the gender differentiator when there is already a clear gender identified in the team's nicknames. These edits should be undone and this category speedily deleted. Jrcla2 (talk) 14:58, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Jrcla2: Well, the parent category was Category:East Tennessee State Buccaneers, not Category:East Tennessee State Buccaneers and Lady Buccaneers. Also, the page for the women's basketball team is East Tennessee State Buccaneers women's basketball, which meant there was a style conflict between using and not using Lady. I checked the official website for the school's women's basketball page and the first article I saw called them the Buccaneers, so I went with that. spiderjerky (talk) 15:35, 28 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2014 Conference USA men's soccer season

A tag has been placed on Category:2014 Conference USA men's soccer season requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 13:40, 29 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2017 establishments in North Dakota

A tag has been placed on Category:2017 establishments in North Dakota requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and it is not presently under discussion at Categories for discussion, or at disambiguation categories.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 06:34, 30 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

May 2017

A page you created has been nominated for deletion as an attack page, according to section G10 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

Do not create pages that attack, threaten, or disparage their subject or any other entity. Attack pages and files are not tolerated by Wikipedia, and users who create or add such material may be blocked from editing. Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 02:41, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My apologies. The warning was sent out in error. You just got caught by Twinkie's autoresponse. I do not operate sockpuppets, so that category is quite frankly offensive. That's why I am requesting it to be deleted as an attack category.

@Kiteinthewind: I'm guessing I made a category for (suspected) sockpuppets of you? Sorry about that. I made tons of those types of categories indiscriminately when we were trying to depopulate the Wanted Categories registry. Feel free to delete it if you feel so inclined, I'm sure someone will do something or something. 2600:8803:A200:E40:E522:565F:AC86:5CE4 (talk) 02:49, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

oh I'm not logged in but this is Spiderjerky, pinkie promise — Preceding unsigned comment added by 2600:8803:A200:E40:E522:565F:AC86:5CE4 (talk) 02:50, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I'm not an admin, but I will seek help from another admin to delete the category. You are not at fault in this incident. You were just collateral damage, unfortuantely, so you have nothing to be sorry about. Kiteinthewind ^{Leave a message!} 02:53, 27 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:America East Conference women's soccer navigational boxes

A tag has been placed on Category:America East Conference women's soccer navigational boxes requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Corkythehornetfan (ping me) 22:09, 11 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Categories for Bible chapters

Hi, I noticed that you had created Category:Isaiah 22 to Category:Isaiah 25, etc ([2]), each of which only contain the main article and verse-number redirects to it. There is a clear precedent at Wikipedia:Categories_for_discussion/Log/2016_November_17#Single-article_Book_of_Isaiah_chapters not to have such categories. Rather than take anyone else's time over this, please would you empty them yourself and tag the category pages with {{db-user}}? The ones containing other pages e.g. Category:Isaiah 8 can stay.

For info, I have left a similar request at User talk:JohnThorne who has created others like that. – Fayenatic London 10:55, 16 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:New Salem, Massachusetts has been nominated for discussion

Category:New Salem, Massachusetts, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. ...William, is the complaint department really on the roof? 22:20, 26 June 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Rocky and Bullwinkle Show

I doubt the necessity or even the usefulness of all those category moves. The "Rocky and Bullwinkle Show" is a common name for what had several different titles as originally broadcast. I don't think that "The Adventures of Rocky and Bullwinkle and Friends" is among those original broadcast titles... AnonMoos (talk) 09:49, 19 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mannes School vs. Mannes College

Actually, the school was Mannes College the New School for Music, which this year they changed to Mannes School of Music. See their homepage at: https://www.newschool.edu/mannes/. - kosboot (talk) 02:11, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Kosboot: My bad, I only moved the pages because they were in Category:Wikipedia non-empty soft redirected categories. spiderjerky (talk) 02:29, 29 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2018–19 in Armenian football

A tag has been placed on Category:2018–19 in Armenian football requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 01:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2018 in Greek television

A tag has been placed on Category:2018 in Greek television requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 01:32, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:2018 Chinese television series endings

A tag has been placed on Category:2018 Chinese television series endings requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. AusLondonder (talk) 01:33, 6 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Electric folk musicians

Why have you removed this category? --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 20:47, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Redrose64:It was soft-redirected to Category:British folk rock musicians. I removed it from pages that already had that category on it. spiderjerky (talk) 20:48, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

It would have been considerate to use an edit summary explaining your action; but in this case, no edit summary is better than the completely misleading edit summary left by SilkTork (talk · contribs) in this edit.

I see that the soft redir was due to these edits by SilkTork and I can find no discussion concerning that. Ideally, there should have been a WP:CFD; not all electric folk musicians are British. Perhaps you know of a discussion that I have not yet found. --Redrose64 🌹 (talk) 21:15, 11 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

@Redrose64: There isn't any discussion that I know of. I always mean to do edit summaries, but i edit so fast i usually forget to, my bad. I'll usually just move pages that are in Category:Wikipedia non-empty soft redirected categories and assume it's approved, which is another thing i should do better on. spiderjerky (talk) 00:20, 12 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:I-Kiribati sportspeople stubs has been nominated for discussion

Category:I-Kiribati sportspeople stubs, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Dawynn (talk) 13:54, 16 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Mouscron

Hi Spiderjerky, I've noticed you've performed some changes stating: "removed Category:R.E. Mouscron players; added Category:Royal Excel Mouscron players using HotCat". Imho this is incorrect. R.E. Mouscron is a defunct club which is different from the new club Royal Excel Mouscron. Could you revert these, thanks! --Pelotas^talk^|^contribs 16:32, 29 November 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Any news on this??? Still wrong. R.E. Mouscron is not the same as Royal Excel Mouscron! --Pelotas^talk^|^contribs 15:30, 12 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Spiderjerky. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Picture books by Arthur Rackham has been nominated for discussion

Category:Picture books by Arthur Rackham, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. A discussion is taking place to see if it abides with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Marcocapelle (talk) 21:29, 10 January 2018 (UTC)[reply]