User talk:SpaceGoofsGeekerBoy

December 2016

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for persistent disruption. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may request an unblock by first reading the guide to appealing blocks, then adding the following text to the bottom of your talk page: {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 20:55, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Well, not surprisingly, you didn't answer my questions. I don't get the sense that you understand our notability guidelines, and even if you do, I'm not sure you care. This is evident to me from your restoration of a completely unsourced article about an animated short that you didn't bother to established notability for. I also don't like that you deleted AfD notices here and here. It's obvious that you're trying to hide those articles' deletion histories and I consider that extraordinarily dishonest. The honest approach would have been to build them up, say, in draft space, do a ton of research, demonstrate clear notability, etc.

The Modifyers article is also plagiarized from Wikia, so that's also a problem. That's why I asked you to explain in your own words what you think plagiarism means, but you didn't bother to answer, so I can only conclude you don't know what plagiarism is (which is a problem) or you don't care (which is a problem). For your edification, see WP:PLAGIARISM. Wikia licenses their content under the Creative Commons Share Alike license, so it's actually okay to copy content from Wikia, provided you give proper attribution. We often use {{Wikia content}} for that purpose. However, the entire article is unsourced, which means that notability cannot be established properly.

Then there are edits like this, where you apparently guess who is voicing a character. "Kathleen Barr sorta voiced Ace. I don't know. You tell me who voiced Ace." That's classy. Strong contribution there. And here you use IMDb as a reference, though you were told in September 2015 that IMDb is insufficient as a reference. Anyway, for these reasons, I think your editing privileges need to be interrupted to prevent damage to the encyclopedia.

Indefinite doesn't mean forever, but if you want to edit again, you're going to have to convince a reviewing admin that you understand the problems that have been raised, and that you have a plan for how you will approach things differently in the future. Note that you, the editor behind this account, are not presently welcome to edit here. Any changes you make during a block can be reverted by any editor for any reason, without regard for WP:3RR, and will only make the community less responsive to considering an unblock in the future. I'm mentioning this because you have previously evaded a block as noted by Ponyo above. Cyphoidbomb (talk) 21:13, 5 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

I'm sorry, I didn't mean anything. I don't wanna be blocked. Please unblock me, and I'll never disobey ever again. --SpaceGoofsGeekerBoy (talk) 03:46, 6 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

SpaceGoofsGeekerBoy (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #17304 was submitted on Jan 09, 2017 23:12:04. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 23:12, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Boulder Media.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Boulder Media.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:24, 5 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zero Day Fox.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zero Day Fox.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:59, 25 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Teacher's Pet.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Teacher's Pet.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:45, 13 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Elf Bowling the Movie: The Great North Pole Elf Strike for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Elf Bowling the Movie: The Great North Pole Elf Strike is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Elf Bowling the Movie: The Great North Pole Elf Strike until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. GMG ^talk 17:48, 9 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Paramount Home Media Distribution.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Paramount Home Media Distribution.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:38, 20 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Camp Lazlo

Template:Camp Lazlo has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. ―Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 08:49, 12 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Zig & Sharko.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Zig & Sharko.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:49, 24 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Elf (film)

A tag has been placed on Category:Elf (film) requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. UnitedStatesian (talk) 02:58, 26 March 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Anomalisa.jpg

The file File:Anomalisa.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 10 May 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fox21 television studios.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fox21 television studios.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 13 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Space Goofs.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Space Goofs.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:43, 20 December 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Fox World.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Fox World.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:20, 10 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Category:Camp Lazlo images

A tag has been placed on Category:Camp Lazlo images indicating that it is currently empty, and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion. If it remains empty for seven days or more, it may be deleted under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself. Qwerfjkl talk 16:54, 25 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sunday Pants for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sunday Pants is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sunday Pants (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Ten Pound Hammer • ^{(What did I screw up now?)} 18:55, 23 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Sunday Pants.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Sunday Pants.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:35, 10 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:The WB 100+ Station Group.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:The WB 100+ Station Group.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:37, 21 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Xilam logo.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Xilam logo.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:31, 16 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Kinofilm

The article Kinofilm has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Article is abandoned and object of discussion has only one piece of work of any significance; this company should be relegated to a mere mention in the show’s production company list in the infobox

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 09:00, 2 April 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of The Naughty Naughty Pets

The article The Naughty Naughty Pets has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Appears to fail WP:NTV and WP:GNG. Tagged for notability since 2018

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any of your contributions for deletion; please refer to the history of each individual page for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 10:00, 9 September 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Foxstar Productions.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Foxstar Productions.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:16, 17 January 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Television.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Metro-Goldwyn-Mayer Television.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:27, 17 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Category:Wander Over Yonder has been nominated for deletion

Category:Wander Over Yonder has been nominated for deletion. A discussion is taking place to decide whether it complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. (Oinkers42) (talk) 16:53, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Alex Walsh

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Alex Walsh requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a real person or group of people that does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. Aszx5000 (talk) 00:23, 17 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]