User talk:Sarbjeet30

Your addition has been removed, as it appears to have added copyrighted material to Wikipedia without permission from the copyright holder. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material; such additions will be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of article content such as sentences or images. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing. --PMDrive1061 (talk) 05:29, 7 March 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of GRADUATE PHARMACY APTITUDE TEST

A tag has been placed on GRADUATE PHARMACY APTITUDE TEST requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be a clear copyright infringement. For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words.

If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. You might want to look at Wikipedia's policies and guidelines for more details, or ask a question here.

If you think that this notice was placed here in error, you may contest the deletion by adding {{hangon}} to the top of the page that has been nominated for deletion (just below the existing speedy deletion or "db" tag - if no such tag exists then the page is no longer a speedy delete candidate and adding a hangon tag is unnecessary), coupled with adding a note on the talk page explaining your position, but be aware that once tagged for speedy deletion, if the page meets the criterion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but don't hesitate to add information to the page that would render it more in conformance with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Chris (talk) 14:15, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Removing Speedy Deletion Tags

Hi, I assume you just made a mistake in handling the speedy deletion at GRADUATE PHARMACY APTITUDE TEST. For the future, you should know that if you need to add the {{hangon}} tag to an article, you should be careful not to delete the speedy deletion notice at the same time. The creator of an article can never remove speedy deletion templates under any circumstance. Qwyrxian (talk) 15:42, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop removing speedy deletion notices from pages that you have created yourself, as you did with GRADUATE PHARMACY APTITUDE TEST. If you continue, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. JamesBWatson (talk) 15:48, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of GRADUATE PHARMACY APTITUDE TEST

The article GRADUATE PHARMACY APTITUDE TEST has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unencyclopedic

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{dated prod}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{dated prod}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. The speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:19, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Does this article appear to be a valid encyclopedic topic to you? It does not read that way to the community, so it would be nice if you did not post it again. Further, why the all-caps title? — Timneu22 · talk 17:21, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

The article could also have been deleted for lack of context - there was no indication of where this test is available. Go to the article about the organisation that runs this test and add a short mention there. That is all we need. — RHaworth (talk · contribs) 17:24, 6 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Sarbjeet30. You have new messages at JamesBWatson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JamesBWatson (talk) 19:13, 7 August 2010 (UTC)[reply]