User talk:Rubic1

January 2021

Hello, I'm Dark-World25. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions—specifically this edit to Model Town (Delhi)—because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you have any questions, you can ask for assistance at the Help desk. Thanks. Dark-World25 (talk) 13:21, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or significantly change content without citing verifiable and reliable sources, as you did with this edit to Model Town (Delhi). Before making any potentially controversial edits, it is recommended that you discuss them first on the article's talk page. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Materialscientist (talk) 15:51, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Dark-World25. The revert you did, was actually not required, and did not appear constructive.

I'm unable to add links, for some reason. Plz do the needful, which use the words affluent. Thanks

Rubicbot (talk) 15:53, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I am unable to add the sources, for some reason

Rubicbot (talk) 15:54, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add promotional material to Wikipedia, as you did to Model Town (Delhi). While objective prose about beliefs, organisations, people, products or services is acceptable, Wikipedia is not a vehicle for soapboxing, advertising or promotion. Thank you. JRDkg (talk) 18:33, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Kindly refrain from deleting facts & information, verified by news citations. Such information in no way qualify as advertising or promotion. Kindly refrain from making non-constructive edit, removing information as you have repeatedly done with Model Town (Delhi). In case if any doubts, please refer to the citations. Rubicbot (talk) 19:20, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia because your username, Rubicbot, contains the suffix "-bot", which is generally reserved for authorized bot accounts.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our username policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you wish for your existing contributions to carry over under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} below. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" from their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a change of name request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use. Therefore, please check the list here to see if a name is taken prior to requesting a change of name.

Appeals: If, after reading the guide to appealing blocks you believe you were blocked in error, then you may appeal this block by adding {{unblock|Your reason here}} below this notice. Cabayi (talk) 22:09, 18 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please unblock my account Rubicbot (talk) 13:20, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Is it wrong to add the word "affluent" ? To a page ? There are news citations which do provide verifications.

Moreover several pages on wikipedia do use such discriptions. One such example : https://en.m.wiki.x.io/wiki/Notting_Hill

Kindly explain this me, how is this not allowed ? Rubicbot (talk) 13:26, 20 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

This user's request to be unblocked to request a change in username has been reviewed by an administrator, who accepted the request.

Rubic1 (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

Requested username:

Rubic1 (talk · contribs · deleted contribs · logs · filter log · block user · block log)

Request reason:

I was not aware that a username with a -bot suffix is not allowed, i was allowed to create the account, without any such warning Rubicbot (talk) 15:13, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Accept reason:

The account has been renamed so I will remove the block. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have also been wrongfully accused of "vandalism ". The only editing i did on my account was to add the word "affluent" and cite some news citations for the same at the Model Town (Delhi) page, which can also be verified from the edit history of the same page.

Is it wrong to add the word "affluent" ? To a page ? There are news citations which do provide verifications.

Moreover several pages on wikipedia do use such discriptions. One such example : https://en.m.wiki.x.io/wiki/Notting_Hill

Kindly explain this me, how is this not allowed ? Rubicbot (talk) 15:18, 22 January 2021 (UTC)}}[reply]

I've merged your requests, you only need one open request. The stated reason for the block is only your username. However, the news citations are just promotional pieces. Do you have a connection to the development you edited about? 331dot (talk) 16:15, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for the suggestion. Kindly do the needful as a global renammer,as Rubic1.

I do not have any connection to the development i edited. There are book citations as well, i wasn't able to add, the only 1 page containing the information out of the entire book.

Apart from that, much information added by people like me is not cited, such as unverified historal information and sometimes dates, yet they are allowed to be carried on.

Rubicbot (talk) 17:02, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Not to mention, 1 of the 2 links in the references section of that page is actually incorrect. Which can simply be verified just by clicking on the link. Yet such edits remain. Rubicbot (talk) 17:18, 22 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Note that as a volunteer project where people do what they can when they can, it is possible for inappropriate content to be in an article, sometimes for years. We can only address what we know about; that does not mean other inappropriate content is acceptable, see other stuff exists. If you are interested in helping out, you are welcome to address this other inappropriate content yourself, or to let others know. 331dot (talk) 09:30, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your feedback! Cheers Rubic1 (talk) 10:22, 23 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]