User talk:Rpmohak
Welcome!
[edit]Hello, Rpmohak, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:
You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.
Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or , and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! OhKayeSierra (talk) 04:09, 2 May 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of MR Pandey
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on MR Pandey requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —Bruce1eetalk 17:14, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Rpmohak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
There has been no unauthorized or incorrect edits made from this account. The ban citing that the account has been used for abuse is false and no wrongdoings have been done or intended to be done. The ban should not be imposed. Rpmohak (talk) 18:18, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
You have not discussed your violations of WP:SOCK. Yamla (talk) 18:23, 5 June 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Rpmohak (block log • active blocks • global blocks • contribs • deleted contribs • filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))
Request reason:
Regarding violation of Sock puppetry, neither have I made unauthorized or unauthentic edits logging out of my account, nor have I opened any other accounts on Wikipedia. Unless when I was logged out due to password being forgotten, I have made all edits logging in with this account and no misleading edits have been made. The many edits made yesterday on the page 'Manish Raj Pandey' are authentic and true because it is of a living person who is my father. Thus no ill-work has been done from this account, for which the ban has been imposed.Rpmohak (talk) 03:55, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Decline reason:
Checkuser block-- I'm sorry, but I cannot unblock you at this time as this is a sockpuppetry and/or checkuser block. Check users have access to technical and personally identifying information they may not disclose openly on Wikipedia. Please read and heed the relevant sections of the WP:GAB. Generally, behavioral issues are also a factor. There are millions of Wikipedia articles, and we are dubious of coincidences when combined with technical findings. If this is not your original account, you will need to appeal at your original account. You will need to deal with all the issues associated with all of your accounts.Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:23, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
If you want to make any further unblock requests, please read the guide to appealing blocks first, then use the {{unblock}} template again. If you make too many unconvincing or disruptive unblock requests, you may be prevented from editing this page until your block has expired. Do not remove this unblock review while you are blocked.
Managing a conflict of interest
[edit]
Hello, Rpmohak. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about in the page Draft:Manish Raj Pandey, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a COI may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the COI guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:
- avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, company, organization or competitors;
- propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
- disclose your COI when discussing affected articles (see WP:DISCLOSE);
- avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:SPAM);
- do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.
In addition, you must disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation (see WP:PAID).
Editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:27, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
I have draftified this as it is unsourced. Please see WP:BLP and WP:BIO. All content must be cited from reliable sources that are unconnected with the subject and have a reputation for fact checking. Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:29, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
"No unauthorized edits"
[edit]This implies you hold the misapprehension that Wikipedia is a webhost for the publication of information authorized by the subjects. It is not. Wikipedia is an encyclopedia with little interest in what subjects, their children, or their "authorized" biographers have to say about a given subject. Please see Wikipedia:Biographies of living persons/Help for information useful to such persons.Dlohcierekim (talk) 12:35, 6 June 2019 (UTC)
Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Rpmohak,
The Wikimedia Foundation is asking for your feedback in a survey about your experience with Wikipedia and Wikimedia. The purpose of this survey is to learn how well the Foundation is supporting your work on wiki and how we can change or improve things in the future. The opinions you share will directly affect the current and future work of the Wikimedia Foundation.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 16:26, 10 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Rpmohak,
A couple of weeks ago, we invited you to take the Community Insights Survey. It is the Wikimedia Foundation’s annual survey of our global communities. We want to learn how well we support your work on wiki. We are 10% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! Your voice matters to us.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,
RMaung (WMF) 15:36, 20 September 2019 (UTC)
Reminder: Community Insights Survey
[edit]Share your experience in this survey
Hi Rpmohak,
There are only a few weeks left to take the Community Insights Survey! We are 30% towards our goal for participation. If you have not already taken the survey, you can help us reach our goal! With this poll, the Wikimedia Foundation gathers feedback on how well we support your work on wiki. It only takes 15-25 minutes to complete, and it has a direct impact on the support we provide.
Please take 15 to 25 minutes to give your feedback through this survey. It is available in various languages.
This survey is hosted by a third-party and governed by this privacy statement (in English).
Find more information about this project. Email us if you have any questions, or if you don't want to receive future messages about taking this survey.
Sincerely,