User talk:RandomGnome
Welcome!
[edit]
|
RandomGnome, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]Hi RandomGnome! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 16:03, 24 December 2018 (UTC) |
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by Nick Moyes (talk) 11:33, 22 January 2019 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
Your thread has been archived
[edit]Hi RandomGnome! You created a thread called Archival by Lowercase sigmabot III, notification delivery by Muninnbot, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing
|
Thanks
[edit]It was on purpose but probably hurts more than helps. Thanks. PackMecEng (talk) 06:06, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
- Ah, ok. My curiosity got the better of me. RandomGnome (talk) 06:14, 9 November 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Prost!
[edit]Thanks for standing up for the spirit of our objective: building together. TanookiKoopa (talk) 05:14, 14 February 2021 (UTC) |
Cheers, TanookiKoopa! RandomGnome (talk) 06:09, 14 February 2021 (UTC)
JOrb
[edit]Hi. Your closure did not address the site ban under discussion. The discussion was not if the block was appropriate, but if a community ban was in order. The close should decide on the consensus of the ban, and inform the user of the result. It may be better left to an uninvolved admin. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 04:37, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Hi User:HighInBC. I have self-reverted the close and will leave it to someone else. Just so I have this right, the community is discussing whether a topic ban should be in place (IvanVector's proposal) should JOrb be successful in appealing the block, and this needs to be directly referred to in the close? I believe my close covered all the bases: Ymblanter's indef block, and the consensus for a topic ban and/or indef block, but I'm more than happy to leave it to someone else to write something more appropriate as needs be. RandomGnome (talk) 05:05, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- A block by an administrator can be reversed by any administrator. But a community ban decided by the community can only be reversed by the consensus of the community. It involves a closure that specifically refers to that and describes it as well as informing the user with a link to the discussion.
- Here is an example of a community ban that I have closed: [1], and the notification for the user: [2]. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 05:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Ah, yes. I see now that this requires more action than just a close summary. Apologies for messing this up and thank you for the guidance and example. RandomGnome (talk) 05:24, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- Here is an example of a community ban that I have closed: [1], and the notification for the user: [2]. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 05:15, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
- No problem. Thanks for self reverting. HighInBC Need help? Just ask. 05:26, 6 July 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]Your access to AWB may be temporarily removed
[edit]Hello RandomGnome! This message is to inform you that due to editing inactivity, your access to AutoWikiBrowser may be temporarily removed. If you do not resume editing within the next week, your username will be removed from the CheckPage. This is purely for routine maintenance and is not indicative of wrongdoing on your part. You may regain access at any time by simply requesting it at WP:PERM/AWB. Thank you! — MusikBot II talk 17:21, 3 January 2023 (UTC)