User talk:Pi-gimjiRu

Welcome!

Hello, Pi-gimjiRu, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask for help here on your talk page and a volunteer will visit you here shortly. Again, welcome! Dan Koehl (talk) 16:28, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Acentrogobius kranjiensis

Trying to find out if Acentrogobius kranjiensis is a valid species, it isnt present at http://www.itis.gov/servlet/SingleRpt/SingleRpt?search_topic=TSN&search_value=172092. Do you have further sources? Dan Koehl (talk) 16:29, 13 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for your comment please give me some time to check with my data source. I want to tell you about this Data were then Derived from a study by scientists of Thailand. However, I am pleased to check the information again. Please do not delete data from the database. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pi-gimjiRu (talk • contribs) 14:24, 14 January 2015‎

(I signed your edit above) By all means no, the article want be deleted, and your contribution is highly appreciated, but its good if we can work out if this is a valid species or not, or whether the article should be redirected to Drombus kranjiensis? In any case, Wikipedia wins in volume and quaility through your contribution. Are you aware of how to use taxoboxes? Ill be more than happy to give a brief introduction. If you are into fishes and taxonomy, you may also enjoy Wikispecies. best regards, Dan Koehl (talk) 14:44, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for instructions on how to use Taxoboxes now I had add more information on this Taxonomy data. If the template is correct or not . I am pleased to bring back to investigate further.unsigned comment added by Pi-gimjiRu (talk • contribs) 22:51, 14 January 2015‎

In the taxobox I just changed species name from A. cyanomos to A. kranjiensis. The question is if this article should be redirected to Drombus kranjiensis? Did you read the discussions on Wiki project fishes, a group you may wish to be added as member? Dan Koehl (talk) 16:22, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

According to discussions on WikiProject Fishes there seem to be a consensus that this fish is presently belonging to Drombus globiceps until any source argue for another suggestion. If you agree I will move the article through recirect to Drombus globiceps Dan Koehl (talk) 20:20, 14 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. First off congrats on your first article. As noted above, I had to move the article to Drombus globiceps and revise much of the text. Please ensure that the species is valid, and always check for and list the synonyms if they exist. That's the best way to make sure that you are creating the article on the correct title and most importantly, on the correct taxon. Reading the following might help familiarize you on the usual practices of creating taxonomic articles: Wikipedia:WikiProject Tree of Life. Cheers. -- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 12:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Anematichthys repasson) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Anematichthys repasson, Pi-gimjiRu!

Wikipedia editor Animalparty just reviewed your page, and wrote this note for you:

To reply, leave a comment on Animalparty's talk page.

Learn more about page curation.

I believe those two articles actually describe the same species? >> Cyclocheilichthys repasson and >> Anematichthys repasson. What do you think? Dan Koehl (talk) 22:52, 15 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Some helpful tips

Hi and thanks for your contributions. I have some helpful tips. First, when adding images to taxoboxes, just the file name should be added, not the thumbnail (e.g. "Fish.jpg" , not "[[File:Fish.jpg|thumb|Fish]]"). This reduces white space around the image and makes the image fit better. Secondly, I've noticed you adding Thai language references and External links to some articles. While non-English sources are allowed on English Wikipedia, English-language sources that have the same information are preferred (see WP:NONENG), so please don't feel bad if they are replaced. For example, FishBase would be preferable to Thaibiodiversity.org. Examples of non-English sources that would be suitable to use include scientific journal articles, in-depth magazine articles, or scholarly book chapters in Thai that elaborates on the information summarized in sites like ThaiBiodiversity.org and FishBase. Similarly, non-English websites should generally not be listed as External Links, or when equivalent English resources are already cited (see WP:NONENGEL). If you have any questions, please consult the resources above or ask! Cheers, --Animalparty-- (talk) 23:00, 16 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Cryptocentrus caeruleopunctatus for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Cryptocentrus caeruleopunctatus is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Cryptocentrus caeruleopunctatus until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ToonLucas22 (talk) 17:25, 22 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your recent edits to fish articles

Hi. I'm sorry but I have to revert most of your recent changes to fish articles. One-sentence sections are not very informative, and most of them seem to just repeat what is already present in the article (they're redundant). They're also bad for the layout. More importantly, they seem to be specific to THAILAND. Please note that Wikipedia is global. We generally do not use country-specific information unless that species is endemic.

I really recommend that you first familiarize yourself with how articles are usually written about organisms. Don't go on large amounts of edits since you are still new. Focus on a few articles and try to bring them up to the quality of other related articles. Your taxoboxes as well are incomplete and/or coded incorrectly.

At the moment, you are increasing the workload of other volunteers since we have to follow up on your edits and fix them.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 02:00, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

If you want, you can focus on ONE article and I can guide you in how to create one that is acceptable to Wikipedia guidelines. I would be happy to help.-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 02:05, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the advice If possible, I want to know which section are all in trouble. Because i have many data thai i want published via Wikipedia. Thanks again.user talk:Pi-gimjiru 11:51 23 January 2015 (UTC+7)

Thank you. Firstly here are specific points you need to pay attention to:

It seems that your primary goal is to use the Thai database as widely as possible. While you are not forbidden from doing this, please do not add it where it is not necessary as that would constitute spamming and would violate Wikipedia policies. Use it only to add new information that does not yet exist in the article. More so given that this is the English Wikipedia, and sources written in English are preferred.

Your formatting does not follow the standard layout and/or use incomplete or broken templates. For example, you are incorrectly adding pictures as thumbnails in the {{Taxobox}}. User:Animalparty above already explained how this can be fixed. Please also fill in the {{Taxobox}} completely. Do not leave the Species, Genus, Phylum, and Kingdom fields blank in your articles.

When there isn't enough information being added on a new article, it is better to keep it all as one paragraph and not divided into sections. Always use natural complete sentences. Do not separate the article into multiple sections each containing only one or two words. For example, instead of sayng "== Habitat == Freshwater and Brackish water", write instead "They are found in freshwater and brackish water."

Do not add Thailand-specific information unless the species is endemic to Thailand. And do not presume that the information in the Thai database applies globally. This is misleading and should be avoided. For example, you wrote that the pinkbar goby is found in the "sea boundary". This is completely meaningless to the readers since you did not identify which sea. Even if you had said "Thailand sea boundary", it is still incorrect, since pinkbar gobies are widely found in the Indian Ocean. From South Africa to the Andaman Islands, not only Thailand.

The best advice I can give you currently is to start slowly. Study existing articles. Study their formatting, their layout, and how they are written. After that, write ONE article. Do your best to bring it to the same quality as the articles you studied. Copy them if you must. If you have problems doing this, don't be afraid to ask. Ask me, any of the editors in Wikipedia Talk:WikiProject Fishes, or even the Wikipedia:Help Desk. This page might also help: Wikipedia:Writing better articles

Please do not make too many articles too fast without fixing their problems. That is bad practice. I had to spend several hours this morning fixing your articles. Don't write another article unless you have ensured that your current article has no misspellings, formatting or layout problems, and fully complies with Wikipedia guidelines to the best of your abilities.

You can see the fixes done to some of your articles in the following links. Please study the changes so you can understand which parts of your edits were problematic:

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Brachygobius_doriae&diff=643758574&oldid=643687799

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Boleophthalmus&diff=643758532&oldid=643687465

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Pinkbar_goby&diff=643758389&oldid=643686124

http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Cryptocentrus_caeruleopunctatus&diff=643759347&oldid=643691004

Cheers-- OBSIDIAN†SOUL 18:29, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

As a follow-up to Obsidian Soul, similarly formatted articles created by Beamkitz (Talk - Contribs) such as Anampses caeruleopunctatus (Rüppell, 1829) suggest you may be using an alternate account or that someone affiliated with you might also benefit from the advice above. --Animalparty-- (talk) 19:21, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please respond before creating more articles. You seem to have created at least six more articles more of the same incorrectly crafted style since Obsidian Soul posted detailed advice of how your contributions can and should be improved. In addition to Beamkitz, I suspect that Baitoeytnt (Contributions) may be another account you are using, since the format of the articles they've created is identical. If not, I apologize for being presumptive, and hopefully they will read this. Please respond before creating more articles. Thank you. --Animalparty-- (talk) 21:01, 24 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Animalparty: I don'y think Pi-gimjiRu has listened.

(see below) ↓ ∞ 220 of ^Borg 10:12, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

@Animalparty: Edits by Special:Contributions/Babebu are also very similar, and often more than one of these accounts have edited the same article, with one adding the linkspam to the Thai biodiversity site, and another adding other content. User:Pi-gimjiRu, please read WP:Multiple accounts. Have you edited using other account names? Dai Pritchard (talk) 11:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Almost 'empty' pages

You seem to be creating some 'empty' pages.Well, the pages aren't 'empty', they have an infobox, and an external link for a source, but they have no other text! We would like a bit more than that please! Lepidocephalichthys berdmorei for example is apparently the Burmese loach, why don't you put that on the page as well? I couldn't even tell that it was a fish! (And try to provide some English language sources perhaps?)

I've gone through 21 pages you created (some as old as January! ) and fixed them in some way, like spelling errors. I also added {{fish-stub}} to many, then I realised they should be more specific like {{Serranidae-stub}}. This is why you should do this right at the start. I am not a 'fish' person or Icthyologist, so I didn't know that. Please note headings in articles are not done in CamelCase, but in Sentence case. See here for an example. 220 of ^Borg 10:06, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop. 220 of Borg advised you an hour ago to stop rapidly creating dozens of nearly-empty articles, but you've ignored his advice, and gone right on creating them. Slow down. Add some content to the articles. They're almost useless in their present state. Dai Pritchard (talk) 10:58, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

AN/I

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. The thread is Linkspamming etc. by Pi-gimjiRu. Thank you. Dai Pritchard (talk) 17:15, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Plotosus canius

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Plotosus canius requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Randykitty (talk) 18:07, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mystus falcarius

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mystus falcarius requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mystus bocourti

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mystus bocourti requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mystus atrifasciatus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mystus atrifasciatus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mystus albolineatus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mystus albolineatus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Leiocassis poecilopterus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Leiocassis poecilopterus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hemibagrus nemurus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hemibagrus nemurus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hemibagrus microphthalmus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hemibagrus microphthalmus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:22, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Hemibagrus filamentus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Hemibagrus filamentus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Batasio tigrinus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Batasio tigrinus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. RichardOSmith (talk) 19:23, 18 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop

You really need to listen to the editors who have left you message here, (I am one of several) and stop creating stubby little fish pages. You need to go to the discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents (WP:AN/I) and explain what you are doing. Failure to do so may see all pages you created deleted, and possibly yourself blocked| from editing.

The fact that you are using only one source exclusively is seen as suspicious. see WP:Spam.

Please see: WP:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents#Linkspamming etc. by Pi-gimjiRu.220 of ^Borg 08:19, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mastacembelus alboguttatus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mastacembelus alboguttatus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 10:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

March 2015

Please stop adding inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Tire track eel. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. If you continue spamming, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. Dai Pritchard (talk) 10:08, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Macrognathus zebrinus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Macrognathus zebrinus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 10:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Macrognathus semiocellatus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Macrognathus semiocellatus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 10:09, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Mastacembelus favus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Mastacembelus favus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Dai Pritchard (talk) 10:13, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Blocked

Pi-gimjiRu, you've ignored the concerns above, placed here by several users, and you've not taken part in this discussion or in the administrators' notice board discussion linked above. Your pattern of editing leads me to believe you're editing with automated tools, so I have blocked your account. The block is brief, and I will remove it if you undertake to stop making these low-quality automated edits and instead agree to discuss other users' legitimate concerns. -- Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 10:32, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Pi-gimjiRu (talk) 16:20, 19 March 2015 (UTC) Sorry for your inconvenience but i need to told you that i don't use automated editor (bot or script) every record i had input by manual. For Taxonomy data that I have put into that system . Are allowed to bring up publicity through wikipedia , but with all detailed information . I still can not log in to the Taxonomy of the audited agencies only. If my actions is offensive to all of you . I apologize for the inconvenience this time .[reply]

Why did you ignore all the many different people who talked to you, above? Why did you continue, even after you were repeatedly asked to stop? -- Finlay McWalterᚠTalk 16:48, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

I see no evidence this user has used automated tools. However, although apparently editing in good faith, this editor along with some likely socks has created an unhelpful mess within the project, and it would be good if their edits can be rolled back by someone who uses tools that automate the job. --Epipelagic (talk) 19:30, 19 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Minous monodactylus

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Minous monodactylus requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is an article with no content whatsoever, or whose contents consist only of external links, a "See also" section, book references, category tags, template tags, interwiki links, images, a rephrasing of the title, a question that should have been asked at the help or reference desks, or an attempt to contact the subject of the article. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Geohakkeri (talk) 09:07, 21 March 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Ways to improve Ambastaia nigrolineata

Hi, I'm Newrunner769. Pi-gimjiRu, thanks for creating Ambastaia nigrolineata!

I've just tagged the page, using our page curation tools, as having some issues to fix. Probably can't add much on a a fish species that on has 1 animal in their family.

The tags can be removed by you or another editor once the issues they mention are addressed. If you have questions, you can leave a comment on my talk page. Or, for more editing help, talk to the volunteers at the Teahouse. Newrunner769 (talk) 21:15, 16 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akysis recavus

Hello Pi-gimjiRu,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Akysis recavus for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Roshan014 (talk) 11:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Akysis vespa

Hello Pi-gimjiRu,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged Akysis vespa for deletion, because it seems to be an article that was created in violation of a block or ban. Content created by banned users will be deleted immediately.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Roshan014 (talk) 11:58, 18 April 2015 (UTC)[reply]