User talk:Philbobagshot

Welcome!

Hello, Philbobagshot, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes ~~~~, which will automatically produce your name and the date.

If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or click here to ask a question on your talk page. Again, welcome!

– Fayenatic London 17:46, 30 March 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Airlander 50

May I offer my personal apology for my thoughtless removal of valid content. I should have known better and I hope that you can put it down to a temporary aberration, no harm was intended. — Cheers, Steelpillow (Talk) 17:41, 9 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Steelpillow, thanks for your apology and reinstatement - both are appreciated. Philbobagshot (talk) 11:51, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

~Thank so much for your help~

Well I at least now I can correctly add a question. I'm brand new to this and have much to learn. Thank you again for your help. ShaneHawkins1982 (talk) 16:45, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

No problem - I am not far behind you! Philbobagshot (talk) 16:57, 10 January 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Faculty of Clinical Informatics (October 10)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by DGG was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

There needs to be additional references providing substantial coverage from third-party;; independent reliable sources, not press releases or mere announcements

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Faculty of Clinical Informatics and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Faculty of Clinical Informatics, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

DGG ( talk ) 08:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Philbobagshot! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! DGG ( talk ) 08:09, 10 October 2018 (UTC)[reply]