User talk:Pediamoderator

September 2017

Please stop making disruptive edits, as you did at Avengers: Age of Ultron.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor, discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page, and seek consensus with them. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

If you continue to disrupt Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Favre1fan93 (talk) 02:14, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hello, Pediamoderator, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun interactive editing tutorial that takes about an hour)
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, or you can click here to ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome! We are so glad you are here! Jim1138 (talk) 07:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Sock puppets

Please report wp:sock puppetry Avoid unsupported accusations. Please beware that good evidence must be supplied. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:12, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Edit warring notice

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Avengers: Age of Ultron. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Jim1138 (talk) 07:24, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

You have made this same edit 6 times, and have been undone by 4 different editors. It's up to you to discuss the contested edit on the article's talk page. I don't know if the edit is good. I simply undid you because you are edit warring and not discussing it. It does not matter if you are right. If you continue to edit war you will likely be blocked. Meters (talk) 07:42, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Being victimised by same person sock puppeting with multiple accounts just to form false "consensus".

This is case of vandalism even with multiple accounts which easily I can indulge in as well but if I do that as well where does it stop. Also the edit I am making is though small is very logical and correct as is easily evident but the sock-puppeteer making irrational deletions for sake of his fan-fiction retention. Please admin analyze the edit along with sock-puppetry. Thank you

September 2017

Your account has been blocked from editing Wikipedia with this username. This is because your username, Pediamoderator, does not meet our username policy.

Your username is the only reason for this block. You are welcome to choose a new username (see below) and continue editing.

A username should not be promotional, related to a "real-world" group or organization, misleading, offensive or disruptive. Also, usernames may not end in the word "bot" unless the account is an approved bot account.

You are encouraged to choose a new account name that meets our policy guidelines and create the account yourself. Alternatively, if you have already made edits and you wish to keep your existing contributions under a new name, then you may request a change in username by:

Adding {{unblock-un|your new username here}} on your user talk page. You should be able to do this even though you are blocked, as you can usually still edit your own talk page. If not, you may wish to contact the blocking administrator by clicking on "Email this user" on their talk page.
At an administrator's discretion, you may be unblocked for 24 hours to file a request.
Please note that you may only request a name that is not already in use, so please check here for a listing of already taken names. The account is created upon acceptance, thus do not try to create the new account before making the request for a name change. For more information, please see Wikipedia:Changing username.

If you think that you were blocked in error, you may appeal this block by adding the text {{unblock|Your reason here}} on your user talk page, but you should read our guide to appealing blocks first. Alex Shih ^Talk 07:57, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Victim of Sock Puppetry only encourages making of multiple accounts

Dear admin, Your blocking of account when I repeatedly complained about being victim to one person with multiple accounts making illogical edits. But instead you have victimized person following the rules while person making multiple accounts just for sake of creating consensus and vandalism has been rewarded. Please do not let Wikipedia succumb to bullying and rule breakers. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Pediamoderator (talk • contribs) 08:03, September 11, 2017 (UTC)

Right... you were undone by four different editors, and now you claim that user:Adamstom.97, user:Favre1fan93, user:TriiipleThreat and I are all socks? The newest of the 4 accounts is more than five years old. Meters (talk) 08:16, 11 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

     You seem to have lot of information on each like they were your own account and how old account are not argument against sock puppetry. They suddenly coming on one after the other to make a minor edit from same IP range is a argument which the admin soon will be investigating.

This blocked user is asking that their block be reviewed on the Unblock Ticket Request System:

Pediamoderator (block log • active blocks • global blocks • autoblocks • contribs • deleted contribs • abuse filter log • creation log • change block settings • unblock • checkuser (log))

UTRS appeal #19212 was submitted on Sep 12, 2017 05:19:22. This review is now closed.

--UTRSBot (talk) 05:19, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Personal attacks

Accusing other editors of sockpuppetry without evidence (and reverting you doesn't count as evidence) is a violation of Wikipedia's policy against personal attacks. If you persist, your access to edit this page will be revoked and you will have a much harder time getting unblocked. At present, your username is the only reason you are blocked, and a change of username is all that is required for the block to be lifted - that, however, can very easily be changed. Furthermore, you have claimed (both here and in your UTRS request) that you know these editors are using the same IP - that is an outright falsehood, since you are not privy to that information. Any further accusations of this sort will require you to address your behaviour as well as your username in any appeal. Yunshui ^雲 _水 09:34, 12 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

  Dear Yunshui, In UTRS I requested the admin to investigate accounts , I might not be privy to that information but I am sure wiki admin are and can easily investigated which was exactly what I asked in clear wording in even my UTRS giving the usernames I requested to investigate because as per Wikipedia policy Sock-puppetry is a serious matter and illegal and supposed to be reported. I don't see how where else to ask admin to investigate which if they do I am sure they will get what I claimed.
              As for changing username I don't see how that is possible, there is change password option but nowhere change Username. Though the fact being it is nearly 10 year old account and allowed by Wikipedia when I made the account as such wikipedia doesn't allow names it finds illegal. Regardless please do guide me what and HOW you want edited like adding a number to it and where?  Pediamoderator Pediamoderator (talk) 04:40, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

I know about the other accounts because their edit histories and logs are public, just as yours are. That's how I know that three of those accounts have roughly 50,000 edits each, and the other one has over 10,000. That's also how I know that while your account is nine years old (not ten, as you claimed), until this year you had only made three edits. One in 2012, one in 2014, and one in 2016. You made seven article edits over two weeks this year, and a few talk page edits. That's it. Fifteen edits in 9 years. Meters (talk) 05:11, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

        I didn't say my account is 10 years old I said nearly 10 years old if you want to get exact then its not even 9 its 9 years and 1 and half month. As for making small edits like changing "the" "a" "it" adds as 1 edit each time don't prove its quality and IP address range. But regardless the case is sock-puppetry non of your excuses exonerate you from it, its illegal. I know you are scared because of your guilt since you are one of the accounts "meter" indulging in illogical childish edit but this query is for Admin not for you your trolling in won't change facts, you can save your excuses.Pediamoderator (talk) 05:51, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

My mistake. You did say "nearly 10 years" but I don't think 9 years and 2 months is "nearly 10 years". Since you continue to make personal attack sin the form of unsubstantiated socking accusations I'm going to request that your talk page access be removed. The only thing you should use this page for is to request an unblock. You have already unsuccessfully requested a UTRS unblock, and since this is a username block I can't see any other request being successful either. Meters (talk) 05:57, 16 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your mistake? You come to my talk page talk about 10 years ,9 years and that is not making personal attacks. I was talking to Admin Yanshui about my block and socking NOT YOU . And about UTRS which he was answering till time you came in and trolled on my TALK PAGE to make personal attacks I didn't go to yours. You are not admin if anything has to said it has to be by Admin not you.Metered (talk) 08:48, 18 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]