Jump to content

User talk:Omniplex

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

What happened to your pages? Ardric47 04:46, 10 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Cross-namespace redirects

[edit]

You are receiving this message because you previously voiced your opinion on a Redirects for deletion of a cross-namespace redirect that was originally deleted but then went to Deletion review and was then relisted at RFD. This is a courtesy notice so you are aware that the issue is being discussed again and is not an endorsement of any position. --Cyde↔Weys 13:25, 21 July 2006 (UTC)[reply]

doesn't work. The month-name is screwed up, so it's trying to transclude a page named "Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Log/2006_<august-gen>_3" -- Fan-1967 02:59, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

  • Something odd going on here. Several pages included {{CURRENTMONTHNAMEGEN}}, which no longer seems to work, so I replaced with {{CURRENTMONTHNAME}}. Seems to transclude fine now. Fan-1967 16:47, 3 August 2006 (UTC)[reply]

CURRENTHOUR

[edit]

TfD nomination of Template:CURRENTHOUR

[edit]

Template:CURRENTHOUR has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. 03:30, 8 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Disputedtag

[edit]

Your participation in {{Disputedtag}} suggests that you might be able to help mediate a misunderstanding about it at Wikipedia talk:Attribution#Merge and policy tags. — SMcCandlish [talk] [contrib] 20:14, 24 March 2007 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:Ttnw

[edit]

Template:Ttnw has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. — Kevinkor2 01:42, 2 April 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image (Image:Wikipedia minilogo.gif)

[edit]

Thanks for uploading Image:Wikipedia minilogo.gif. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 21:36, 10 July 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion of Template:H:l

[edit]

A tag has been placed on Template:H:l requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes.

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 06:20, 9 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Template:Villagepumppages/Archive requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section T3 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a deprecated or orphaned template. After seven days, if it is still unused and the speedy deletion tag has not been removed, the template will be deleted.

If the template is intended to be substituted, please feel free to remove the speedy deletion tag and please consider putting a note on the template's page indicating that it is substituted so as to avoid any future mistakes (<noinclude>{{transclusionless}}</noinclude>).

Thanks. --MZMcBride (talk) 03:49, 16 February 2008 (UTC)[reply]

TfD nomination of Template:!

[edit]

Template:! has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. TheJosh (talk) 00:21, 1 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I notice that this category you created is unpopulated (empty). In other words, no Wikipedia pages belong to it. If it remains unpopulated for four days, it may be deleted without discussion, in accordance with Wikipedia:Criteria for speedy deletion#C1. I'm notifying you in case you wish to (re-)populate it by adding [[Category:Moderator handbook]] to pages that belong in it.

I tagged the category. This will not, in itself, cause the category to be deleted. It serves to document (in the page history) that the category was empty at the time of tagging and also to alert other watchers that the category is in jeopardy. You are welcome to remove the tag if you wish. However, removing the tag will not prevent deletion of the category if it remains empty.

If you created the category in error, or it is no longer needed, you can speed up the deletion process by tagging it with {{db-author}}.

I am a human being, not a bot, so you can contact me if you have questions about this. Best regards, --Stepheng3 (talk) 17:42, 15 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:" has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for Deletion page. Thank you. Hairy Dude (talk) 16:40, 30 September 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Vat has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 22:36, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Template:Edi has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. WOSlinker (talk) 22:39, 7 January 2011 (UTC)[reply]

File:Red-x.gif listed for deletion

[edit]

A file that you uploaded or altered, File:Red-x.gif, has been listed at Wikipedia:Files for deletion. Please see the discussion to see why this is (you may have to search for the title of the image to find its entry), if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Sfan00 IMG (talk) 12:25, 13 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:WPArticle listed at Redirects for discussion

[edit]

An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Template:WPArticle. Since you had some involvement with the Template:WPArticle redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion (if you have not already done so). Steel1943 (talk) 17:31, 25 November 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Template:! has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Keφr 10:18, 28 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

TFD for Template 123

[edit]

Nomination for deletion of Template:123

[edit]

Template:123 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page.--216.12.10.118 (talk) 19:09, 1 April 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Deprecated shortcut

[edit]

Template:Deprecated shortcut has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Steel1943 (talk) 23:25, 2 August 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for merging of Template:Catfd2

[edit]

Template:Catfd2 has been nominated for merging with Template:Tfd2. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. Hhkohh (talk) 07:35, 2 July 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A tag has been placed on Category:Handbook templates requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section C1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the category has been empty for seven days or more and is not a disambiguation category, a category redirect, a featured topics category, under discussion at Categories for discussion, or a project category that by its nature may become empty on occasion.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. Liz Read! Talk! 14:42, 25 September 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:!

[edit]

Template:! has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. JsfasdF252 (talk) 23:49, 21 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Template:0expr has been listed at templates for discussion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. User:GKFXtalk 16:24, 23 December 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Evaldemo/2

[edit]

Template:Evaldemo/2 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:42, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination for deletion of Template:Evaldemo/3

[edit]

Template:Evaldemo/3 has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the entry on the Templates for discussion page. Gonnym (talk) 13:42, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]