User talk:Nwlaw63

Welcome!

Hello, Nwlaw63, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on discussion pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{helpme}} before the question. Again, welcome! --chaser - t 22:09, 5 September 2008 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks

Hi, Nwlaw63, and thanks for your thoughtful and helpful comment on the Lanamark Education talk page. Unfortunately, you comment has been used by another editor - Pedant17, who has been persistently trying to stuff the article with anti-Landmark propaganda for several years - to support a view which appears to me to be the opposite of what you suggest. DaveApter (talk) 15:41, 16 December 2008 (UTC)[reply]

February 2009

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but your recent edit removed content from Second Amendment to the United States Constitution. When removing text, please specify a reason in the edit summary and discuss edits that are likely to be controversial on the article's talk page. If this was a mistake, don't worry; the text has been restored, as you can see from the page history. Take a look at the welcome page to learn more about contributing to this encyclopedia, and if you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. Thank you. I know you meant well, but you should achieve a consensus for such a large deletion before making that deletion. SMP0328. (talk) 02:10, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I fully explained my edit on the discussion page. And I will continue to edit in the best interest of the article. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:32, 18 February 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again

Thanks for your couple of minor edits to improve the Landmark Education page. I do think however that the article needs a much more extensive overhaul - it consists mostly of excessive coverage of marginal critical comments and very little useful information about the subject itself. DaveApter (talk) 12:07, 23 April 2009 (UTC)[reply]

WP:Hornbook -- a new WP:Law task force for the J.D. curriculum

Hi Nwlaw63,

I'm asking Wikipedians who are interested in United States legal articles to take a look at WP:Hornbook, the new "JD curriculum task force".

Our mission is to assimilate into Wikipedia all the insights of an American law school education, by reducing hornbooks to footnotes.

Each casebook will have a subpage.

Over the course of a semester, each subpage will shift its focus to track the unfolding curriculum(s) for classes using that casebook around the country.
It will also feature an extensive, hyperlinked "index" or "outline" to that casebook, pointing to pages, headers, or {{anchors}} in Wikipedia (example).
Individual law schools can freely adapt our casebook outlines to the idiosyncratic curriculum devised by each individual professor.

I'm encouraging law students around the country to create local chapters of the club I'm starting at my own law school, "Student WP:Hornbook Editors". Using WP:Hornbook as our headquarters, we're hoping to create a study group so inclusive that nobody will dare not join.

What you can do now:

1. Add WP:Hornbook to your watchlist, {{User Hornbook}} to your userpage, and ~~~~ to Wikipedia:Hornbook/participants.

2. If you're a law student,

Email http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/WP:Hornbook to your classmates, and tell them to do the same.
Contact me directly via talk page or email about coordinating a chapter of "Student WP:Hornbook Editors" at your own school.

(You don't have to start the club, or even be involved in it; just help direct me to someone who might.)

3. Introduce yourself to me. Law editors on Wikipedia are a scarce commodity. Do knock on my talk page if there's an article you'd like help on.

Regards, Andrew Gradman ^talk/_WP:Hornbook 05:35, 31 July 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Landmark education banner

Just thought you might like to know that removal of a banner from an article, particularly after reasoning for including the banner was given, probably constitutes acting along the lines prohibited by WP:OWN and other policies and guidelines. It is not your place, or that of any other editor, to try to dictate to others what they will or will not deal with, and is in fact a violation of wikipedia conduct guidelines. Please do not engage in such conduct again. Thank you. John Carter (talk) 18:34, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for your comment. I see nothing WP:OWN policy forbidding the removal of inappropriate banners. See my latest comment on the talk page for why the inclusion of this religious material seems very strange to me.Nwlaw63 (talk) 19:44, 24 August 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Addition of unsourced material

Please do not add unsourced material to articles on Wikipedia, as you did at the article Landmark Education, here [1]. Thank you, Cirt (talk) 23:15, 28 January 2010 (UTC)[reply]

the Public Policy Initiative Assessment Team wants You!

Hi Nwlaw63, It looks like you have some expertise in law and public policy. I saw some of your contributions on an article that falls within the scope of Wikiproject: United States Public Policy, and I was hoping you would be interested in assessing articles with the Public Policy Initiative. There is more info about assessment on the 9/13/2010 Signpost. Even though assessment is typically for long term Wikipedians the Initiative is also about fostering a friendly environment for new users. If you're interested or just curious you can sign up on the project page or just contact me. Thanks! ARoth (Public Policy Initiative) (talk) 00:34, 4 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

UK Supreme Court case drive

Hi! Thanks for taking the time to read this message.

As you may know, the United Kingdom Supreme Court has been hearing cases for about 18 months now, taking over from the House of Lords as the Court of Last Resort for most appeals within the United Kingdom.

During that time, the court has handed down 87 judgements (82 of which were on substantive appeals). Wikipedia covers around 11 of these and rarely in any detail. Some very important cases (including Radmacher v Granatino [2010] UKSC 42 (prenups) and Norris v USA [2010] UKSC 9 (extradition)) are not covered at all.

I'm proposing a drive to complete decent quality articles for all, or at least a good proportion of these cases as soon as possible. If we can eliminate the backlog then a small group of editors might want to stick around to ensure articles are created relatively speedily for new cases. Since the Court process, on average, one case a week this shouldn't be too great a task.

I'd like to ask you to help with this drive, and help make Wikipedia a credible source for UKSC case notes.

How you can help

Help me improve this Template:Infobox SCOTUK case based off the US Supreme Court equivalent.

Complete that template and add it to existing cases.

Improve formatting & prose. Copyediting.

Improve the coverage of cases we have articles on, including adding content, sourcing and fact-checking

Create new articles for UKSC cases

Improve the categorisation and listing of UKSC cases.

Improve the judgment listings articles: 2009 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom 2010 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom 2011 Judgments of the Supreme Court of the United Kingdom

Thanks for reading!, Sincerely Bob House 884 (talk) 23:26, 28 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for stopping by - there's a lot of interesting work to be done here. I will work on creating/editing one or more of these articles as soon as I have the time available.Nwlaw63 (talk) 19:24, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Glad to hear it :) We've got a temp. page here - Wikipedia talk:WikiProject Law/UKSC if you'd like to pop by. Bob House 884 (talk) 19:26, 29 March 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Volker Rule

Thank you for your contribution to Volker Rule. (saw you on WP:Tea) 99.35.13.28 (talk) 06:19, 25 October 2011 (UTC)[reply]

I didn't have time to read it yet, include what you would like ...

Talk:Volcker_Rule#New_York_Review_of_Books_resource.2C_relating_to_the_Late-2000s_recession_contributing_factors 97.87.29.188 (talk) 23:16, 14 November 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Purplebackpack89's mass nominations

For the purposes of full disclosure I want you to know I have nominated the actions of User:Purplebackpack89 at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard#Abusive mass nominations for deletion and wikistalking of opponents to deletion Luciferwildcat (talk) 08:16, 7 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

Star Pirates AfD Discussion

I've changed my vote from Delete to Redirect, I humbly ask you consider the option I present and change your vote to reflect. Quasi Montana (talk) 03:15, 16 December 2011 (UTC)[reply]

physistical

Thank you for you comment! I do not understand being spammed, by these people for creating a "hoax" when I have evidence from the Oxford Dictionaries and University Press stating physistical is a real term. PhysicsDude21 (talk) 21:39, 12 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talkback

Hello, Nwlaw63. You have new messages at JamesBWatson's talk page.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

JamesBWatson (talk) 22:18, 13 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Taiwanese archipelago

Please reconsider your vote at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Taiwan island group. The article has been expanded with numerous sources. A move request is also on the way at Talk:Taiwan island group. Thanks. 203.145.92.173 (talk) 20:52, 29 January 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Any Video Converter

I am the original creator and I had no intention to advertise. The article was hijacked and the sources were removed. I also added another one to the AfD. SL93 (talk) 01:19, 28 February 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hi

An article you commented on for deletion before is under the chopping block again, you may want to express your opinion on this matter at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/John Márquez (2nd nomination), thank you.LuciferWildCat (talk) 05:50, 16 April 2012 (UTC)[reply]

An AFD you participated in has been started again

List of UK Singles Chart Christmas number twos has been renominated by the same nominator 11 days after it closed as "no consensus". I'm contacting everyone who participated in the last AFD, who hasn't found their way there already. Dream Focus 21:21, 14 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 11

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Where White Men Fear to Tread, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wounded Knee (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 12:41, 11 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]

caic.org.au discussion

Hello! As someone who has edited the Landmark Worldwide article in the past few weeks, I am notifying you of a discussion at the Reliable Sources Noticeboard regarding the use of the website caic.org.au as a reliable source in that article. Please feel free to review or participate in that discussion.

Thank you for your contributions to Wikipedia. --Tgeairn (talk) 21:44, 6 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Coal Hill School

Hi, Nwlaw63. I just wanted to draw your attention to the edits I've made to Coal Hill School. I've found a number of reliable secondary sources which discuss the fictional school, in a few cases in some detail. I leave it to you whether the citations I've found constitute "significant coverage" enough to change your view on the AfD. I will probably continue to work on improving the article's sourcing over the next few days. —Josiah Rowe (talk • contribs) 05:23, 4 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Edit Conflict

Hello Nwlaw63-

It looks like this edit inadvertently removed your previous edit(s). You may want to restore your comments. I have dropped a note for the other editor, they can always resolve it too. --Tgeairn (talk) 23:24, 10 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Apologies for the confusion at the lpr deletion discussion

The conversation from the lp (Unix) deletion discussion had several of the same participants, and there was some discussion there as to how both articles should really be about the print system rather than the command. As you weren't involved in that discussion, there's no way you should have known that I was focused on finding WP:RS for the system instead of the command. Nor did I do a quick edit on the article itself to indicate the refocusing. You are absolutely right: the citations I listed do not establish the notability for the command.

I've done a quick pass on the article. If you have time and inclination, take a look and see if you think there's sufficient notability to support a merge+redirect to Line Printer Daemon protocol.

Again, sorry for the confusion. It was entirely my fault.

Lesser Cartographies (talk) 10:56, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Request for arbitration

You are involved in a recently filed request for arbitration. Please review the request at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case#Issues related to Landmark Worldwide and, if you wish to do so, enter your statement and any other material you wish to submit to the Arbitration Committee. Additionally, the following resources may be of use—

Thanks, • Astynax ^talk 01:54, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Case opened

You were recently listed as a party to a request for arbitration. The Arbitration Committee has accepted that request for arbitration and an arbitration case has been opened at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide. Evidence that you wish the arbitrators to consider should be added to the evidence subpage, at Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide/Evidence. Please add your evidence by October 30, 2014, which is when the evidence phase closes. You can also contribute to the case workshop subpage, Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide/Workshop. For a guide to the arbitration process, see Wikipedia:Arbitration/Guide to arbitration. For the Arbitration Committee, S Philbrick (Talk) 01:46, 16 October 2014 (UTC) --S Philbrick (Talk) 01:46, 16 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please comment

http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia_talk:Notability_(sports)#Bullpen_catchers Alex (talk) 06:00, 1 November 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 4

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited President's Council on Jobs and Competitiveness, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Joseph Hansen. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:29, 4 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Case/Landmark Worldwide closed

This arbitration case has been closed and the final decision is available at the link above. The following remedies have been enacted:

1.1) The committee cautions the parties involved that standard discretionary sanctions may be authorised by the committee in future – for any edit about, and for all pages relating to, Landmark Worldwide – and by motion after application at a later time.

2) Parties to the case are reminded to base their arguments in reliable, independent sources and to discuss changes rather than revert on sight.

6) The Arbitration Committee urges that editors having no prior editing history on Landmark Worldwide and no strong views on the underlying controversy review and edit this article, helping to ensure that our policies governing neutral point of view and reliable sources are followed.

For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 06:34, 29 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Review of Keynesian Economics

Hi, thanks for participating in this AfD, we can use more editors participating in these discussions, especially for academic journals. Unfortunately, I have to admit that I failed in WP:BEFORE here (explained in the AfD) and perhaps you want to revise your !vote in the light of this (no obligation whatsoever, of course, just informing you of new information that has become available). Sorry for the hassle... --Randykitty (talk) 21:02, 7 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration clarification

There is a request for clarification in which you are named here http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Wikipedia:Arbitration/Requests/Clarification_and_Amendment#Clarification_request:_Landmark_Worldwide.2FR6_Additional_eyes_invited DaveApter (talk) 18:17, 9 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Arbitration clarification request closed

This is a courtesy message to inform you that an arbitration clarification request in which you were listed as a party has been closed and archived with a motion being enacted which authorises standard discretionary sanctions for the topic of Landmark Worldwide, broadly construed. For the Arbitration Committee, Callanecc (talk • contribs • logs) 10:13, 23 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Landmark DS

Please carefully read this information:

The Arbitration Committee has authorised discretionary sanctions to be used for pages regarding Landmark Worldwide, a topic which you have edited. The Committee's decision is here.

Discretionary sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimize disruption to controversial topics. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to the topic that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behavior, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. This message is to notify you sanctions are authorised for the topic you are editing. Before continuing to edit this topic, please familiarise yourself with the discretionary sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.

This message is informational only and does not imply misconduct regarding your contributions to date.

Apologies for this bureaucratic silliness, but according to the labyrinthine WP:AC/DS system you aren't "alerted". Which doesn't make sense because you were part of the arbitration case, but bureaucracies seldom make sense. Manul ~ talk 01:47, 28 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Formal mediation has been requested

The Mediation Committee has received a request for formal mediation of the dispute relating to "Landmark Worldwide". As an editor concerned in this dispute, you are invited to participate in the mediation. Mediation is a voluntary process which resolves a dispute over article content by facilitation, consensus-building, and compromise among the involved editors. After reviewing the request page, the formal mediation policy, and the guide to formal mediation, please indicate in the "party agreement" section whether you agree to participate. Because requests must be responded to by the Mediation Committee within seven days, please respond to the request by 13 February 2015.

Discussion relating to the mediation request is welcome at the case talk page. Thank you.
Message delivered by MediationBot (talk) on behalf of the Mediation Committee. 15:58, 6 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Request for mediation rejected

The request for formal mediation concerning Landmark Worldwide, to which you were listed as a party, has been declined. To read an explanation by the Mediation Committee for the rejection of this request, see the mediation request page, which will be deleted by an administrator after a reasonable time. Please direct questions relating to this request to the Chairman of the Committee, or to the mailing list. For more information on forms of dispute resolution, other than formal mediation, that are available, see Wikipedia:Dispute resolution.

For the Mediation Committee, TransporterMan (TALK) 18:48, 13 February 2015 (UTC)[reply]
(Delivered by MediationBot, on behalf of the Mediation Committee.)

Thank you very much

Thank you, Nwlaw63, for acknowledging at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/NewsBank that my quality improvement efforts to the page NewsBank have demonstrated that it "Appears to have sufficient coverage in reliable secondary sources.".

Your kind words about my quality improvement efforts to Wikipedia are much appreciated.

Thanks again,

— Cirt (talk) 20:32, 3 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Please revisit The Land of Gorch

Nwlaw63,

Hi there, hope you're doing well.

I'd like to please ask you to revisit your comments at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Land of Gorch.

Update: Please note -- I've expanded the page with sourced material, and improved its quality greatly. Please visit this updated version of the article to evaluate whether this article should be kept or not on Wikipedia.

Thank you,

— Cirt (talk) 19:43, 11 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Update: No need to revisit -- the AFD was since closed. The result was Keep. Thank you, — Cirt (talk) 05:06, 18 October 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:50, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Uwe Rosenberg, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Babel. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:16, 25 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for catching this - bots save the day again. Nwlaw63 (talk) 18:51, 31 July 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Hidden treasures

Thanks for cleaning up Uwe Rosenberg's page and updating it with so much useful info. While making a few edits of my own, I noticed by accident that some of your work (the bit about him founding Lookout games in this edit: http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Uwe_Rosenberg&diff=716815443&oldid=716814144) was hidden on the page the a result of a misplaced closing bracket in a ref tag. Took me a little while to figure out why I kept seeing it somewhere, but couldn't later find it on the page :) Dragged it back into the light now. JudgeGregg (talk) 11:34, 10 November 2016 (UTC) ==[reply]

Thank you! There's so much work to be done on these board game pages - thanks for doing some of it. Nwlaw63 (talk) 02:28, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

@Nwlaw63: I do what I can. But the state most of those articles are in.. A deletionist's nightmare. :) I think the project's page needs a styleguide section for "Gameplay" sections. Most of them are 10,000-word manuals — and if you look at the project's talk page, people keep adding new ones along these lines, thinking that's the idea. Do you know if bold editing also applies to project pages? I've joined about a year ago, but I'm not sure if I'm allowed to go ahead and come up with guidelines just like that. JudgeGregg (talk) 16:36, 11 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Nwlaw63. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

December 2016

Hello, I'm Zackmann08. Thank you for your recent contributions to Blood Rage (board game). I noticed that when you added the image to the infobox, you added it as a thumbnail. In the future, please do not use thumbnails when adding images to an infobox (see WP:INFOBOXIMAGE). What does this mean? Well in the infobox, when you specify the image you wish to use, instead of doing it like this:

|image=[[File:SomeImage.jpg|thumb|Some image caption]]

Instead just supply the name of the image. So in this case you can simply do:

|image=SomeImage.jpg.

There will then be a separate parameter for the image caption such as |caption=Some image caption. Please note that this is a generic form message I am leaving on your page because you recently added a thumbnail to an infobox. The specific parameters for the image and caption may be different for the infobox you are using! Please consult the Template page for the infobox being used to see better documentation. Thanks! Zackmann08 (^{Talk to me}/_{What I been doing}) 19:25, 11 December 2016 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Near and Far

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Near and Far requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the article appears to be about a person, a group of people, an individual animal, an organization (band, club, company, etc.), web content, or an organized event, but it does not credibly indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. Under the criteria for speedy deletion, such articles may be deleted at any time. Please read more about what is generally accepted as notable.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. 216.235.231.28 (talk) 14:54, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

The article is just being created and I haven't added the sourcing yet. I will be removing speedy deletion tag after I do so. Nwlaw63 (talk) 14:58, 1 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Gloomhaven (September 17)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Aguyintobooks was:

This submission's references do not adequately show the subject's notability. Wikipedia requires significant coverage (not just mere mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject—see the general guideline on notability, the golden rule and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue. Please improve the submission's referencing (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners and Help:Introduction to referencing/1), so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia. If additional reliable sources cannot be found for the subject, then it may not be suitable for Wikipedia at this time.

The comment the reviewer left was:

see WP:N

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Gloomhaven and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 10:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! Nwlaw63, I noticed your article was declined at Articles for Creation, and that can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Α Guy into Books™ § (Message) - 10:59, 17 September 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Santorini (game), you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages CBC, Paste and Toronto Metro (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:43, 2 October 2017 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Nwlaw63. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

A barnstar for you!

	The Teamwork Barnstar
	Thanks for allowing me to help out with Azul (board game). I look forward to seeing where you take the article. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 00:28, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

More Plan B Games coverage

Going into the subject of Plan B Games' work, I and a couple users from WP:DISCORD found some more possibilities for articles for Plan B Games, particularly Century Spice Road: [2] [3]

Do you think these references would be good enough? I can't write the article myself because writer's block hit me. jd22292 (Jalen D. Folf) (talk • contribs) 01:32, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

There's about 5 others I see in a Google News search - about the same as Azul at this point. Maybe it's a bit borderline, but given that the number of good sources will only increase over time, I think there's enough there. If you get a chance, you might look at my edit history - I'd appreciate any assistance you want to offer on the board game articles I've been working on over the last year. Nwlaw63 (talk) 01:36, 24 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for March 1

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Near and Far, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Inverse (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 1 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Kingdomino Box Cover.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Kingdomino Box Cover.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:32, 7 April 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for August 23

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Gloomhaven, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Eurogames (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:19, 23 August 2018 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Nwlaw63. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 29

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Azul (board game), you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Vox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 09:14, 29 December 2018 (UTC)[reply]

A page you started (Karuba (board game)) has been reviewed!

Thanks for creating Karuba (board game).

I have just reviewed the page, as a part of our page curation process and note that:

The article could use a section about the game's critical reception

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Rosguill}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.

_signed,Rosguill ^talk 23:31, 25 January 2019 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2019 election voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2019 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 on Monday, 2 December 2019. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2019 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:11, 19 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Picture of Azul game box.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Picture of Azul game box.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 03:27, 22 November 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 27

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Snakes and Lattes, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Wired (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 09:13, 27 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

I have sent you a note about a page you started

Hello, Nwlaw63

Thank you for creating Just One (board game).

User:Citrivescence, while examining this page as a part of our page curation process, had the following comments:

Consider adding well-cited information about the rules and the board/equipment, as well as a photo of the game logo. Thank you!

To reply, leave a comment here and prepend it with {{Re|Citrivescence}}. And, don't forget to sign your reply with ~~~~ .

(Message delivered via the Page Curation tool, on behalf of the reviewer.)

Citrivescence (talk) 03:56, 28 December 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Restoration

I think you should perhaps consider changing the section on Dark Tower (game) back to simply saying "Restoration". Return to Dark Tower is indeed a restoration and while there are changes to it, it's still classified as a restoration - similar to Restoration Games' other projects that include Stop Thief and Fireball Island. DÅRTHBØTTØ_(T•C) 20:16, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I suppose what I'm suggesting is just going by the categorization of a restoration, rather than the publisher name. DÅRTHBØTTØ_(T•C) 20:25, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

I think just 'Restoration' is confusing - since the game is being remade by Restoration Games, it's unclear whether or not the section title refers to the company name. Some other synonym for restoration would be fine, I think. Nwlaw63 (talk) 21:13, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

When I first read about the game, I heard the term "sequel" thrown around just as much as "remake" and "restoration". Do board games have sequels? DÅRTHBØTTØ_(T•C) 21:33, 23 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, there are. I think sequel works just fine. Nwlaw63 (talk) 03:30, 24 January 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:41, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Calico (board game) moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Calico (board game), is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. ... discospinster _talk 21:27, 8 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Scythe board game box.jpg

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Scythe board game box.jpg. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:55, 3 August 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:19, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

COI

Hello, Nwlaw63. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization, clients, or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{edit COI}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest § How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam § External link spamming);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. Thank you. Polygnotus (talk) 20:44, 18 December 2023 (UTC)[reply]