User talk:Minorax/Archive 4
This is an archive of past discussions about User:Minorax. Do not edit the contents of this page. If you wish to start a new discussion or revive an old one, please do so on the current talk page. |
Archive 1 | Archive 2 | Archive 3 | Archive 4 | Archive 5 | Archive 6 | → | Archive 10 |
The Signpost: 25 July 2021
- News and notes: Wikimania and a million other news stories
- Special report: Hardball in Hong Kong
- In the media: Larry is at it again
- Board of Trustees candidates: See the candidates
- Traffic report: Football, tennis and marveling at Loki
- News from the WMF: Uncapping our growth potential – interview with James Baldwin, Finance and Administration Department
- Humour: A little verse
Administrators' newsletter – July 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (July 2021).
|
|
- An RfC is open to add a delay of one week from nomination to deletion for G13 speedy deletions.
- Last week all wikis were very slow or not accessible for 30 minutes. This was due to server lag caused by regenerating dynamic lists on the Russian Wikinews after a large bulk import. (T287380)
- Following an amendment request, the committee has clarified that the Talk page exception to the 500/30 rule in remedy 5 of the Palestine-Israel articles 4 case does not apply to requested move discussions.
- You can vote for candidates in the 2021 Board of Trustees elections from 4 August to 17 August. Four community elected seats are up for election.
"Twinkle Khanna Filmography" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Twinkle Khanna Filmography. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 August 2#Twinkle Khanna Filmography until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Elli (talk | contribs) 06:32, 2 August 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 29 August 2021
- News and notes: Enough time left to vote! IP ban
- In the media: Vive la différence!
- Wikimedians of the year: Seven Wikimedians of the year
- Gallery: Our community in 20 graphs
- News from Wiki Education: Changing the face of Wikipedia
- Recent research: IP editors, inclusiveness and empathy, cyclones, and world heritage
- WikiProject report: WikiProject Days of the Year Interview
- Traffic report: Olympics, movies, and Afghanistan
- Community view: Making Olympic history on Wikipedia
Administrators' newsletter – September 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (August 2021).
- Feedback is requested on the Universal Code of Conduct enforcement draft by the Universal Code of Conduct Phase 2 drafting committee.
- A RfC is open on whether to allow administrators to use extended confirmed protection on high-risk templates.
- A discussion is open to decide when, if ever, should discord logs be eligible for removal when posted onwiki (including whether to oversight them)
- A RfC on the next steps after the trial of pending changes on TFAs has resulted in a 30 day trial of automatic semi protection for TFAs.
- The Score extension has been re-enabled on public wikis. It has been updated, but has been placed in safe mode to address unresolved security issues. Further information on the security issues can be found on the mediawiki page.
- A request for comment is in progress to provide an opportunity to amend the structure, rules, and procedures of the Arbitration Committee election and resolve any issues not covered by existing rules. Comments and new proposals are welcome.
- The 2021 RfA review is now open for comments.
The Signpost: 26 September 2021
- News and notes: New CEO, new board members, China bans
- In the media: The future of Wikipedia
- Op-Ed: I've been desysopped
- Disinformation report: Paid promotional paragraphs in German parliamentary pages
- Discussion report: Editors discuss Wikipedia's vetting process for administrators
- Recent research: Wikipedia images for machine learning; Experiment justifies Wikipedia's high search rankings
- Community view: Is writing Wikipedia like making a quilt?
- Traffic report: Kanye, Emma Raducanu and 9/11
- News from Diff: Welcome to the first grantees of the Knowledge Equity Fund
- WikiProject report: The Random and the Beautiful
Administrators' newsletter – October 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (September 2021).
- Following an RfC, extended confirmed protection may be used preemptively on certain high-risk templates.
- Following a discussion at the Village Pump, there is consensus to treat discord logs the same as IRC logs. This means that discord logs will be oversighted if posted onwiki.
- DiscussionTools has superseded Enterprisey's reply-link script. Editors may switch using the "Discussion tools" checkbox under Preferences → Beta features.
- A motion has standardised the 500/30 (extended confirmed) restrictions placed by the Arbitration Committee. The standardised restriction is now listed in the Arbitration Committee's procedures.
- Following the closure of the Iranian politics case, standard discretionary sanctions are authorized for all edits about, and all pages related to, post-1978 Iranian politics, broadly construed.
- The Arbitration Committee encourages uninvolved administrators to use the discretionary sanctions procedure in topic areas where it is authorised to facilitate consensus in RfCs. This includes, but is not limited to, enforcing sectioned comments, word/diff limits and moratoriums on a particular topic from being brought in an RfC for up to a year.
- Editors have approved expanding the trial of Growth Features from 2% of new accounts to 25%, and the share of newcomers getting mentorship from 2% to 5%. Experienced editors are invited to add themselves to the mentor list.
- The community consultation phase of the 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process is open for editors to provide comments and ask questions to candidates.
Centering tags
I just happened to be browsing Wikipedia:Ribbons when I noticed that you replace the <center> tags with <div> tags. I've not come to object to the change, but your obs tag
edit summary caught me by surprise. Is this true, that <center> tags are obsolete? Where can I read more about this development? — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 06:15, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- @CJDOS: Hello. The help page is on mediawiki and local obsolete HTML tags can be found at Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:18, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for the helpful reply. I have read the links you've provided, and will have to check my pages tomorrow for some of these obsolete tags. Why is the Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag page not in alphabetical order? I filtered the results by User page, but it would make it easier to check for any other obsolete tags I may be using if I knew about where my user name should alphabetically appear in the list. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 06:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- @CJDOS: Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag is sorted according to the last edit date. To check for the lint errors on a particular page, you can use Special:PageInfo. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- So, if I don't see any errors being mentioned in the Page information link on the right, then I'm good? I mean, I should replace obsolete tags, but if they're present, they're not throwing errors. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 06:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- @CJDOS: Yes, no errors = ok. As of now, they're not giving any big issues and since this is a large wiki, any broken template will most likely be noticed by someone and they can fix it accordingly. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:48, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- So, if I don't see any errors being mentioned in the Page information link on the right, then I'm good? I mean, I should replace obsolete tags, but if they're present, they're not throwing errors. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 06:46, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- @CJDOS: Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag is sorted according to the last edit date. To check for the lint errors on a particular page, you can use Special:PageInfo. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 06:40, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
- Thank you for the helpful reply. I have read the links you've provided, and will have to check my pages tomorrow for some of these obsolete tags. Why is the Special:LintErrors/obsolete-tag page not in alphabetical order? I filtered the results by User page, but it would make it easier to check for any other obsolete tags I may be using if I knew about where my user name should alphabetically appear in the list. — CJDOS, Sheridan, OR (talk) 06:35, 11 October 2021 (UTC)
Tagging pages for speedy deletion
Hello, Minorax,
I'm not sure about other admins patrolling CSD categories but, for me, it's always best to stick with approved CSD criteria rather than writing in your own rationales. I'm not even sure how to verify "cross-wiki spam" or how you know about what is occurring on other Wikipedia projects. Thanks for your work. Liz Read! Talk! 01:54, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
- @Liz: Hello. As there is no option to add in a comment when tagging a page under the preset criteria, I chose to have a custom rationale indicating which CSD criteria it fulfills and proceed to add in additional comments. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:59, 28 October 2021 (UTC)
The Signpost: 31 October 2021
- From the editor: Different stories, same place
- News and notes: The sockpuppet who ran for adminship and almost succeeded
- Discussion report: Editors brainstorm and propose changes to the Requests for adminship process
- Recent research: Welcome messages fail to improve newbie retention
- Community view: Reflections on the Chinese Wikipedia
- Traffic report: James Bond and the Giant Squid Game
- Technology report: Wikimedia Toolhub, winners of the Coolest Tool Award, and more
- Serendipity: How Wikipedia helped create a Serbian stamp
- Book review: Wikipedia and the Representation of Reality
- WikiProject report: Redirection
- Humour: A very Wiki crossword
Administrators' newsletter – November 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (October 2021).
- Phase 2 of the 2021 RfA review has commenced which will discuss potential solutions to address the 8 issues found in Phase 1. Proposed solutions that achieve consensus will be implemented and you may propose solutions till 07 November 2021.
- Toolhub is a catalogue of tools which can be used on Wikimedia wikis. It is at http://toolhub.wikimedia.org/.
- GeneralNotability, Mz7 and Cyberpower678 have been appointed to the Electoral Commission for the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections. Ivanvector and John M Wolfson are reserve commissioners.
- Eligible editors are invited to self-nominate themselves to stand in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections from 07 November 2021 until 16 November 2021.
- The 2021 CheckUser and Oversight appointments process has concluded with the appointment of five new CheckUsers and two new Oversighters.
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
The Signpost: 29 November 2021
- In the media: Denial: climate change, mass killings and pornography
- WikiCup report: The WikiCup 2021
- Deletion report: What we lost, what we gained
- From a Wikipedia reader: What's Matt Amodio?
- Arbitration report: ArbCom in 2021
- Discussion report: On the brink of change – RFA reforms appear imminent
- Technology report: What does it take to upload a file?
- WikiProject report: Interview with contributors to WikiProject Actors and Filmmakers
- Recent research: Vandalizing Wikipedia as rational behavior
- Humour: A very new very Wiki crossword
Administrators' newsletter – December 2021
News and updates for administrators from the past month (November 2021).
- Unregistered editors using the mobile website are now able to receive notices to indicate they have talk page messages. The notice looks similar to what is already present on desktop, and will be displayed on when viewing any page except mainspace and when editing any page. (T284642)
- The limit on the number of emails a user can send per day has been made global instead of per-wiki to help prevent abuse. (T293866)
- Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee Elections is open until 23:59, 06 December 2021 (UTC).
- The already authorized standard discretionary sanctions for all pages relating to the Horn of Africa (defined as including Ethiopia, Somalia, Eritrea, Djibouti, and adjoining areas if involved in related disputes), broadly construed, have been made permanent.
"Fleet (Republic of Singapore Navy)" listed at Redirects for discussion
A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Fleet (Republic of Singapore Navy). The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 December 18#Fleet (Republic of Singapore Navy) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Seloloving (talk) 00:51, 18 December 2021 (UTC)
A barnstar for you!
The Anti-Vandalism Barnstar | |
Your rollbacks are faster than ever, and you're beating me to the finish line in reverting. However, congrats to you! Severestorm28 13:35, 20 December 2021 (UTC) |
The Signpost: 28 December 2021
- From the editor: Here is the news
- News and notes: Jimbo's NFT, new arbs, fixing RfA, and financial statements
- Serendipity: Born three months before her brother?
- In the media: The past is not even past
- Arbitration report: A new crew for '22
- By the numbers: Four billion words and a few numbers
- Deletion report: We laughed, we cried, we closed as "no consensus"
- Gallery: Wikicommons presents: 2021
- Traffic report: Spider-Man, football and the departed
- Crossword: Another Wiki crossword for one and all
- Humour: Buying Wikipedia
Comendy
लोग 2022 का इंतजार ऐसे कर रहे ह जैसे कि घर में कोई नई दुल्हन आने वाली हो🤣🤣🤣 Rockay boss (talk) 05:57, 30 December 2021 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – January 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (December 2021).
Interface administrator changes
|
|
- Following consensus at the 2021 RfA review, the autopatrolled user right has been removed from the administrators user group; admins can grant themselves the autopatrolled permission if they wish to remain autopatrolled.
- Additionally, consensus for proposal 6C of the 2021 RfA review has led to the creation of an administrative action review process. The purpose of this process will be to review individual administrator actions and individual actions taken by users holding advanced permissions.
- Following the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections, the following editors have been appointed to the Arbitration Committee: Beeblebrox, Cabayi, Donald Albury, Enterprisey, Izno, Opabinia regalis, Worm That Turned, Wugapodes.
- The functionaries email list (functionaries-enlists.wikimedia.org) will no longer accept incoming emails apart from those sent by list members and WMF staff. Private concerns, apart from those requiring oversight, should be directly sent to the Arbitration Committee.
Page mover granted
Hello, Minorax. Your account has been granted the "extendedmover" user right, either following a request for it or demonstrating familiarity with working with article names and moving pages. You are now able to rename pages without leaving behind a redirect, move subpages when moving the parent page(s), and move category pages.
Please take a moment to review Wikipedia:Page mover for more information on this user right, especially the criteria for moving pages without leaving a redirect. Please remember to follow post-move cleanup procedures and make link corrections where necessary, including broken double-redirects when suppressredirect
is used. This can be done using Special:WhatLinksHere. It is also very important that no one else be allowed to access your account, so you should consider taking a few moments to secure your password. As with all user rights, be aware that if abused, or used in controversial ways without consensus, your page mover status can be revoked.
Useful links:
- Wikipedia:Requested moves
- Category:Requested moves, for article renaming requests awaiting action.
If you do not want the page mover right anymore, just let me know, and I'll remove it. Thank you, and happy editing! Cabayi (talk) 12:52, 16 January 2022 (UTC)
Removing pd-ineligble-usonly
Hi, would you mind explaining why you made this edit with no explanation, despite me explaining why the file can't be copied to Commons? As this is a British logo, font choice is copyrightable, so there is a reason I tagged it with pd-inelegible-usonly. — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 20:00, 21 January 2022 (UTC)
- @Berrely: Hello. I believe that the logo is simple enough to be ineligible for copyright protection. As per this, "minimum threshold of originality seems to depend on the type of work, and a clear distinction between quantitative and qualitative labour that has to go into the work to turn it original cannot be made out". IMO the font used is a generic enough to not be copyrighted. If one were to argue that the font used is copyrightable, files such as c:File:NSPCC official logo.svg or anything in c:Category:Logos of the United Kingdom would need to go. However, this is just my POV and comments are welcome. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 00:11, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
- Meh, I guess you're right. Frutiger is so generic at this point that it probably isn't creative enough. I've reverted my <nowiki> edit. Thanks for your file work and have a good day :) — Berrely • Talk∕Contribs 07:24, 22 January 2022 (UTC)
Article deletion discussion
Hello my name is Satish and I have written an article and the name of the article is siddhant Ghegadmal (Actor) I have put many references in that article but wikipedia editor repeatedly puts templates to remove that article lest that article Do not be removed, I made this article with great effort, please make this article better and not delete it 2409:4042:D08:F051:5CBA:5D05:A6D4:BD07 (talk) 09:06, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
- Instead of repeatedly removing the AfD template despite being told not, you could've participated in the discussion at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Siddhant Ghegadmal (Actor) and the article might have a slim chance of being kept. --Minorax«¦talk¦» 09:09, 27 January 2022 (UTC)
The Signpost: 30 January 2022
- Special report: WikiEd course leads to Twitter harassment
- News and notes: Feedback for Board of Trustees election
- Interview: CEO Maryana Iskander "four weeks in"
- Black History Month: What are you doing for Black History Month?
- WikiProject report: The Forgotten Featured
- Arbitration report: New arbitrators look at new case and antediluvian sanctions
- Traffic report: The most viewed articles of 2021
- Obituary: Twofingered Typist
- Essay: The prime directive
- In the media: Fuzzy-headed government editing
- Recent research: Articles with higher quality ratings have fewer "knowledge gaps"
- Crossword: Cross swords with a crossword
File:Kit right arm alainfc1112a.png, File:Kit left arm alainfc1112a.png
hey, yes the same, u can delete it Sm3a (talk) 13:45, 2 February 2022 (UTC)
Administrators' newsletter – February 2022
News and updates for administrators from the past month (January 2022).
- The Universal Code of Conduct enforcement guidelines have been published for consideration. Voting to ratify this guideline is planned to take place 7 March to 21 March. Comments can be made on the talk page.
- The user group
oversight
will be renamedsuppress
in around 3 weeks. This will not affect the name shown to users and is simply a change in the technical name of the user group. The change is being made for technical reasons. You can comment in Phabricator if you have objections. - The Reply Tool feature, which is a part of Discussion Tools, will be opt-out for everyone logged in or logged out starting 7 February 2022. Editors wishing to comment on this can do so in the relevant Village Pump discussion.
- The user group
- Community input is requested on several motions aimed at addressing discretionary sanctions that are no longer needed or overly broad.
- The Arbitration Committee has published a generalised comment regarding successful appeals of sanctions that it can review (such as checkuser blocks).
- A motion related to the Antisemitism in Poland case was passed following a declined case request.
- Voting in the 2022 Steward elections will begin on 07 February 2022, 14:00 (UTC) and end on 26 February 2022, 13:59 (UTC). The confirmation process of current stewards is being held in parallel. You can automatically check your eligibility to vote.
- Voting in the 2022 Community Wishlist Survey is open until 11 February 2022.
What's wrong with you
What is the issue with my pic. 223.230.51.162 (talk) 22:33, 5 February 2022 (UTC)
Thank you!
Hello, Minorax,
I just wanted to thank you for taking the time to PROD all of these unused, personal photos, most for over a decade old. They will never be used in articles and are unneeded. There must be some gigantic category containing all of these self-published photos so thank you for going through and tagging the most obviously unnecessary ones. Liz Read! Talk! 01:37, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Liz: Glad to help to clear Category:Copy to Wikimedia Commons (bot-assessed). :) --Minorax«¦talk¦» 01:46, 10 February 2022 (UTC)
- What is especially helpful when you do this is that you spread your file taggings over the 24 hour clock...or at least the hours when you're working on Wikipedia! Sometimes, when editors get the urge to PROD a lot of pages, they can tag dozens of pages over a ten minute or hour long period. Since the patrolling admin has to examine each page to make sure it is eligible to be PROD'd and hasn't been part of a deletion discussion before, this can be burdensome. But you spread your file taggings over a few hours or even at different times during the day and night which makes the situation much easier for the small group of admins who look over the PROD lists & categories. Thank you for pacing your taggings out over hours instead of doing them all over a very short period of time. Liz Read! Talk! 19:20, 12 February 2022 (UTC)
- @Minorax: Happy for you to delete the picture you mentioned. It was added when served as Chairman of the Investment Analysts Society over a decade ago. No longer involved there, so happy for you to delete it.Garrethe
Chris Stedman image
Hi Minorax, I have now noted, concerning the Chris Stedman image at http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/File:Chris_Stedman,_at_First_Unitarian_Society_of_Minneapolis,_Oct_2011.jpg, that I have now released this image (which is my own unpublished creation) freely into the public domain. Thanks, Frank H. Burton --Fhburton (talk) 03:31, 27 February 2022 (UTC)