User talk:Meetthefeebles

Archives

If I have left you a message: please answer on your talk page, as I am watching it.
If you leave me a message: I will answer on my talk page, then place {{Talkback|Meetthefeebles}} on your talk.
Please click here to leave me a new message.

Bradwall GA Review

Many thanks for taking the time to go through the article on Bradwall, and proving some very useful feedback for the GA Review. I will have a read through in due course, and hope to be able to make the necessary improvements. I might be back for some suggestions! Thanks again, --Iantresman (talk) 19:17, 28 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the comment and offer of feedback, will let you know in due course (may be several days) --Iantresman (talk) 16:55, 29 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I've been through all your suggestions, and updated my Bradwall GA Progress page. I've added comments where appropriate, and where I remembered, a link to the diff showing any changes. I think we're another step in the right direction, but if you still have the energy, I'd welcome any more suggestions. Thanks again. --Iantresman (talk) 15:11, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the note, I won't hold you to any schedule, when you're you're busy. Hope it all goes smoothly. --Iantresman (talk) 16:24, 11 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

No problem at all, and thank you again for putting all your effort into the earlier review. Wikipedia can indeed be quite exasperating sometimes, and what with work commitments, a Wikibreak is sometimes what's needed. --Iantresman (talk) 19:32, 29 October 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your free 1-year HighBeam Research account is approved!

Good news! You are approved for access to 80 million articles in 6500 publications through HighBeam Research.

The 1-year, free period begins when you enter the code you were emailed. If you did not receive a code, email wikiocaasi@yahoo.com your Wikipedia username.
To activate your account: 1) Go to http://www.highbeam.com/prof1
If you need assistance, email or ask User:Ocaasi. Please, per HighBeam's request, do not call the toll-free number for assistance with registration.
A quick reminder about using the account: 1) try it out; 2) provide original citation information, in addition to linking to a HighBeam article; 3) avoid bare links to non-free HighBeam pages; 4) note "(subscription required)" in the citation, where appropriate. Examples are at WP:HighBeam/Citations.
HighBeam would love to hear feedback at WP:HighBeam/Experiences
Show off your HighBeam access by placing {{User:Ocaasi/highbeam_userbox}} on your userpage
When the 1-year period is up, check applications page to see if renewal is possible. We hope it will be.

Thanks for helping make Wikipedia better. Enjoy your research! Cheers, Ocaasi 15:31, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gateshead Stadium

I've never found any decent free photographs of the stadium itself, but AdamKR does have some photos of young athletes competing in the stadium on flickr. Don't know it that is of any use or not. Thanks. --Kafuffle (talk) 21:50, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Spotted- thanks! Meetthefeebles (talk) 22:34, 30 August 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Montpelier, Brighton

Hi – I've attempted to cover the points you raised, although I have been more successful with some than with others. I may have a brief chance to look for/add more info in the next couple of days, but will be struggling thereafter as I am moving house. Please have a look at my recent additions and advise if there are any other significant gaps I should concentrate on. Many thanks, Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 18:51, 2 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for picking this up so quickly. Hassocks5489 (tickets please!) 13:00, 3 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Meetthefeebles. You have new messages at Talk:Windy Nook/GA1.
You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{Talkback}} or {{Tb}} template.

....aaah I love templates...like sticking decals all over the fridge (or bumper bar) :) Casliber (talk · contribs) 00:23, 17 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Your question at WT:GAN

I think what's happening is that editors aren't realising you're quoting the exchange we had during the review, and are instead thinking that we're arguing in your thread. Maybe if you put it in a quote box or something? Malleus Fatuorum 03:03, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I think so too, so after some difficulty (I am dreadful at this sort of thing) I have put the original discussion in a big box... Meetthefeebles (talk) 11:30, 20 September 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Ravensworth

Yeah, it seems like a very thorough review and it's completely overwhelmed me as I've had other things crop up that I need to do. If you complete the review that will still be helpful, as I will complete your suggestions at a later date. There is just much more that needs doing in the article than I originally expected. Farrtj (talk) 18:21, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yeah, I feel a bit bad about it, given how thorough your review was. But like I said, your suggestions will be implemented, just at a later juncture. Farrtj (talk) 18:27, 20 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:The ScareHouse/GA1

I was the editor overseeing this as it was written, so I can clarify one thing: Margee is a volunteer staffer at TS, and her article was a TS initiative. Unfortunately, I hear that the TS owner dislikes free licenses, so the IIRC the "plagarized" text was originally supposed to be freelicensed, and I guess he never did it. As such, I am afraid the plagiarized text needs to be removed or at least tagged with one of the copyvio templates; maybe this will motivate the TS people to adopt a free license. Ditto for the images, there is an official TS flicker channel with a lot of better images (w/out the ad-like logo), but they are still not freely licensed. Sigh. --_{Piotr Konieczny aka Prokonsul Piotrus| reply here} 02:33, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks for the feedback on the page, the writing I did for the wiki page was actually adopted for their 'behind the scenes' page, so same author. I'll address the points you brought up today. --Margee Kerr (talk) 12:28, 23 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Smooth Radio

Just wanted to say thanks for passing this. It's great news. Paul MacDermott (talk) 12:55, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Thanks again. I hadn't originally planned to take this to FAC as I wasn't sure whether there was enough material for that, but I've been quite surprised by how much stuff there is during my research, so I think it's definitely worth a shot. I'll open a peer review this evening and see how it goes. Cheers Paul MacDermott (talk) 19:27, 25 November 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Bill Shankly

Hi, Meetthefeebles. Thank you very much for the review and for promoting the article to GA. I will withdraw now as I consider my work on here is done but I hope the Liverpool Task Force will pick this up and take heed of your advice which could hopefully enable the article to reach featured status. Thanks again and all the very best to you. --81.132.89.114 (talk) 13:26, 2 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Apocalypse (Six Flags America) GAN

Hi, have you forgotten about the Apocalypse (Six Flags America) review you were doing? All the issues were fixed over a week ago.--Dom497 (talk) 22:46, 13 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sorry I rather disappeared at the back end of this one – I was got unexpectedly snowed under with urgent work which meant that this place had to take a back seat for a while. I'm glad to see that the article has now been promoted; congrats to all involved. Meetthefeebles (talk) 22:02, 18 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Gateshead International Stadium

I think the article has a reasonable chance of passing at FAC, and would encourage you to try nominating the article. So that you have the best possible chance for success, I strongly recommend getting a copy-edit pre-FAC. A good copy-editor can help you spot jargon (important in sports articles) and clean up any remaining glitches. The person who I would recommend asking for help is User:Sarastro1; he is probably our finest sports writer, but is not so familiar with the sports in question to miss confusing elements. Get him on your side and a nomination will be much easier. If he's too busy to copy-edit, you can always check WP:FAC and see if any copy-editors appear to be having a positive effect on a given article. As for the bit you are having trouble citing, I suggest simply removing it. If your article has any chinks in its armor, FAC's reviewers will find them. Giants2008 (Talk) 01:39, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Copy-edit

No problem, although it may be a day or two. Ping me if I haven't done anything by Monday. Sarastro1 (talk) 11:15, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Before I get started, there is one little issue. The word "stadium" is overused a little, particularly in the lead where it is used 8 times in the first paragraph. While it is unavoidable when naming the stadium, perhaps some synonyms (e.g. "venue", "site") could be used to add some variety. Sarastro1 (talk) 23:53, 29 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, I agree it's tricky! I'll hopefully start to look properly later today, and I will add any questions to the talk page rather than the peer review so that we are not getting mixed up. Sarastro1 (talk) 12:07, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Sheriff Hill

Hi Meetthefeebles, I'm beginning the copy-edit you requested for the above article at the GOCE Request page. Please feel free to contact me, and to correct or revert my changes if I'm doing something I shouldn't. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 19:43, 30 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Just to inform you that on the image http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/File:P4020179.JPG (Housing in the Egremont Estate), a couple of car licence plates are clearly legible. I'm unsure of WP's policy but it might be prudent to obscure them for privacy reasons. I'd do it myself but I can't replace the current version. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 22:36, 1 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Done - feel free to contact me about any issues arising from the copy-edit, and good luck with the FA nomination, though I recommend a Peer Review beforehand. Cheers, Baffle gab1978 (talk) 04:06, 3 January 2013 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Drive award

		The Tireless Contributor Barnstar
		Thank you for contributing to the November/December 2012 Good Article nomination backlog elimination drive. --Noleander (talk) 21:54, 5 February 2013 (UTC)[reply]

TUSC token f843c48b189125338e4151422fcca5b0

I am now proud owner of a TUSC account!

A kitten for you!

Welcome back!

$Brookie :) { - he's in the building somewhere!} (Whisper...)$ 13:06, 22 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

I am more of a dog person, but I am not an ungrateful soul...many thanks! :) Meetthefeebles (talk) 21:54, 23 April 2013 (UTC)[reply]

WikiProject Good Articles Recruitment Centre

Hello! Now, some of you might have already received a similar message a little while ago regarding the Recruitment Centre, so if you have, there is no need to read the rest of this. This message is directed to users who have reviewed over 15 Good article nominations and are not part of WikiProject Good articles (the first message I sent out went to only WikiProject members).

So for those who haven't heard about the Recruitment Centre yet, you may be wondering why there is a Good article icon with a bunch of stars around it (to the right). The answer? WikiProject Good articles will be launching a Recruitment Centre very soon! The centre will allow all users to be taught how to review Good article nominations by experts just like you! However, in order for the Recruitment Centre to open in the first place, we need some volunteers:

Recruiters: The main task of a recruiter is to teach users that have never reviewed a Good article nomination how to review one. To become a recruiter, all you have to do is meet this criteria. If we don't get at least 5-10 recruiters to start off with (at the time this message was sent out, 2 recruiters have volunteered), the Recruitment Centre will not open. If interested, make sure you meet the criteria, read the process and add your name to the list of recruiters. (One of the great things about being a recruiter is that there is no set requirement of what must be taught and when. Instead, all the content found in the process section is a guideline of the main points that should be addressed during a recruitment session...you can also take an entire different approach if you wish!) If you think you will not have the time to recruit any users at this time but are still interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still add your name to the list of recruiters but just fill in the "Status" parameter with "Not Available".

Co-Director: The current Director for the centre is me (Dom497). Another user that would be willing to help with some of the tasks would be helpful. Tasks include making sure recruiters are doing what they should be (teaching!), making sure all recruitments are archived correctly, updating pages as needed, answering any questions, and distributing the feedback form. If interested, please contact me (Dom497).

Nominators, please read this: If you are not interested in becoming a recruiter, you can still help. In some cases a nominator may have an issue with an "inexperienced" editor (the recruitee) reviewing one of their nominations. To minimize the chances of this happening, if you are fine with a recruitee reviewing one of your nominations under the supervision of the recruiter, please add your name to the list at the bottom of this page. By adding your name to this list, chances are that your nomination will be reviewed more quickly as the recruitee will be asked to choose a nomination from the list of nominators that are OK with them reviewing the article.

If you have any questions please do not hesitate to contact me. I look forward to seeing this program bring new reviewers to the Good article community and all the positive things it will bring along.

A message will be sent out to all recruiters regarding the date when the Recruitment Centre will open when it is determined. The message will also contain some further details to clarify things that may be a bit confusing.--Dom497 (talk)

This message was sent out by --EdwardsBot (talk) 14:45, 9 June 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 10

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1996–97 Newcastle United F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page The Telegraph (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:04, 10 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 17

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1996–97 Newcastle United F.C. season, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Douglas Hall (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:05, 17 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 24

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited 1996–97 Newcastle United F.C. season, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages The Mirror, Daily Record and Arthur Cox (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:15, 24 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Talk:1996–97 Arsenal F.C. season/GA1

Just a note that the issues you raised in your review of this GA nomination were addressed 13 days ago, and the next step is your response to these revisions. Many thanks. BlueMoonset (talk) 13:25, 25 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]

It's been over a month since you put a note saying you'd just moved and would try to resume the review shortly. Any chance of you coming back, or should we find someone else to finish the review? BlueMoonset (talk) 14:52, 1 September 2013 (UTC)[reply]

Books and Bytes: The Wikipedia Library Newsletter

Books and Bytes

Volume 1, Issue 1, October 2013

by The Interior (talk · contribs), Ocaasi (talk · contribs)

Greetings Wikipedia Library members! Welcome to the inaugural edition of Books and Bytes, TWL’s monthly newsletter. We're sending you the first edition of this opt-in newsletter, because you signed up, or applied for a free research account: HighBeam, Credo, Questia, JSTOR, or Cochrane. To receive future updates of Books and Bytes, please add your name to the subscriber's list. There's lots of news this month for the Wikipedia Library, including new accounts, upcoming events, and new ways to get involved...

New positions: Sign up to be a Wikipedia Visiting Scholar, or a Volunteer Wikipedia Librarian

Wikipedia Loves Libraries: Off to a roaring start this fall in the United States: 29 events are planned or have been hosted.

New subscription donations: Cochrane round 2; HighBeam round 8; Questia round 4... Can we partner with NY Times and Lexis-Nexis??

New ideas: OCLC innovations in the works; VisualEditor Reference Dialog Workshop; a photo contest idea emerges

News from the library world: Wikipedian joins the National Archives full time; the Getty Museum releases 4,500 images; CERN goes CC-BY

Announcing WikiProject Open: WikiProject Open kicked off in October, with several brainstorming and co-working sessions

New ways to get involved: Visiting scholar requirements; subject guides; room for library expansion and exploration

Read the full newsletter

Thanks for reading! All future newsletters will be opt-in only. Have an item for the next issue? Leave a note for the editor on the Suggestions page. --The Interior 20:24, 27 October 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Wikipedia Library Survey

As a subscriber to one of The Wikipedia Library's programs, we'd like to hear your thoughts about future donations and project activities in this brief survey. Thanks and cheers, Ocaasi^{t | c} 15:03, 9 December 2013 (UTC)[reply]

The Fifth Element

Hello again. You reviewed and passed my good article nomination for The Fifth Element. Accordingly, and as I note you said it is also one of your favourite films, I though i'd let you know that after considerable expansions (taking into account advise you left me on your GA review) I have now nominated the article for featured status. One person is currently supporting it. Just though i'd throw that our there, in case you feel inclined to weigh in on its nomination. No worries if you're too busy though. If there's something you'd like me to review in return, like a DYK or GA nomination (I have no experience with featured candidate reviews myself, this is my first nominated article for featured status) just let me know. Have a nice day. Freikorp (talk) 05:53, 24 July 2014 (UTC)[reply]

I've noticed you haven't made any edits since my last message, so you probably never saw it. Just an update in case you log in in time to see the new nomination: the original FAC was archived as only 2 people were supporting it, and apparently I need a minimum of 3. I have now renominated the article for FAC, and anticipate a quicker and smoother process as all the original concerns from the first FAC have already been addressed. See Wikipedia:Featured article candidates/The Fifth Element/archive2. Freikorp (talk) 01:19, 20 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for December 2

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. Wikipedia appreciates your help. We noticed though that when you edited Jackie Milburn, you added links pointing to the disambiguation pages Forward, The Telegraph and The Journal. Such links are almost always unintended, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of "Did you mean..." article titles. Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 10:15, 2 December 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 14:15, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Wikipedia:Today's featured article/January 15, 2016

Meetthefeebles, I'll get to this one tonight I think. Let me know if it needs any changes. - Dank (push to talk) 22:28, 27 December 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Meetthefeebles. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Meetthefeebles. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2018 election voter message

Hello, Meetthefeebles. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Old Mill 1960.jpg

The file File:Old Mill 1960.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 31 July 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Old Three Tuns.JPG

The file File:Old Three Tuns.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 12 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Sheriff Hill Pit Map.gif

The file File:Sheriff Hill Pit Map.gif has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 14 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Three Tuns May 2010.JPG

The file File:Three Tuns May 2010.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 21 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Three Tuns FC.jpg

The file File:Three Tuns FC.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 23 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:William Clarke (cricketer)-2.jpg

The file File:William Clarke (cricketer)-2.jpg has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:02, 25 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of File:Travellers Rest.JPG

The file File:Travellers Rest.JPG has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

unused, low-res, no obvious use

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated files}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the file's talk page.

Please consider addressing the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated files}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and files for discussion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion.

This bot DID NOT nominate any file(s) for deletion; please refer to the page history of each individual file for details. Thanks, FastilyBot (talk) 01:01, 26 August 2019 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive - July 2021

Good article nominations \| July 2021 Backlog Drive
July 2021 Backlog Drive: This Thursday, July 1, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number, length, and age, of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:31, 29 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

GAN Backlog Drive – January 2022

Good article nominations \| January 2022 Backlog Drive
January 2022 Backlog Drive: On New Year's Day, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? You can sign up here.
Other ways to participate: Join the conversations on our talkpage.
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 10+ good article reviews or participated in the March backlog drive. Click here and remove your username from the mailing list to opt out of any future messages. --Usernameunique

Sent by MediaWiki message delivery (talk) on behalf of Wikipedia:WikiProject Good articles at 21:18, 31 December 2021 (UTC).[reply]

June 2022 Good Article Nominations backlog drive

Good article nominations \| June 2022 Backlog Drive
On 1 June, a one-month backlog drive for good article nominations will begin. Barnstars will be awarded based on the number and age of articles reviewed. Interested in taking part? Sign up here!
You're receiving this message because you have conducted 5+ good article reviews or participated in previous backlog drives. Click here to opt out of any future messages. (t · c) buidhe 04:26, 28 May 2022 (UTC)[reply]