User talk:Maximus Fingolfin

Welcome!

Hello, Maximus Fingolfin, and welcome to Wikipedia! I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of the pages you created may not conform to some of Wikipedia's guidelines, and may not be retained.

There's a page about creating articles you may want to read called Your first article. If you are stuck, and looking for help, please come to the New contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Questions or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! 129.31.216.26 (talk) 00:01, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Golgi voltage gates

Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. Although everyone is welcome to contribute to Wikipedia, introducing inappropriate pages, such as Golgi voltage gates, is not in accordance with our policies. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox.

If you think that the page was nominated in error, contest the nomination by clicking on the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion" in the speedy deletion tag. Doing so will take you to the talk page where you can explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. You can also visit the page's talk page directly to give your reasons, but be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag yourself, but do not hesitate to add information that is consistent with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines.

December 2012

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from Golgi voltage gates, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Click here to contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the page's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. While I agree with removing the deletion tag, you should not remove these tags from articles you have created. Eeekster (talk) 00:06, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please do not add or change content, as you did to Ubiquitin-Proton Ionotropic complex, without verifying it by citing reliable sources. Please review the guidelines at Wikipedia:Citing sources and take this opportunity to add references to the article. Thank you. Please do not create articles without citations. Eeekster (talk) 00:37, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Ubiquitin-Proton Ionotropic complex

The article Ubiquitin-Proton Ionotropic complex has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find no mention of this concept anywhere other than in Wikipedia. It is one of two articles on closely related topics, created by a single-purpose account and largely edited by another single-purpose account. The other one of the two articles cites a reference to a research paper, which may contain mention of the concepts, but, even if it does, the fact that the authors of one paper have coined a concept and referred to it in that paper does not constitute substantial coverage, and arguably it is not an independent source either.

I had no part whatsoever in this research, and am only reporting on it. I have never met any of the people responsible for this research either. I was suprised to hear that you could find no reference to this topic elsewhere, as I have been taught about it in my university degree. This page is, as others have said before, a work in progress. Please do not delete

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:46, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had no part whatsoever in this research, and am only reporting on it. I have never met any of the people responsible for this research either. I was suprised to hear that you could find no reference to this topic elsewhere, as I have been taught about it in my university degree. This page is, as others have said before, a work in progress. Please do not delete

The fact that you have been taught about it in a University course does not guarantee that the subject satisfies Wikipedia's notability guidelines. When I was an undergraduate I did a 24 lecture course on a subject which was purely new research conducted by the professor who taught the course. There was, at the time, no coverage of the subject in any book anywhere, and no coverage in any form except in papers by that professor. The subject would have come nowhere near to satisfying Wikipedia's notability requirements. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:01, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Golgi voltage gates

The article Golgi voltage gates has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

I can find no mention of this concept anywhere other than in Wikipedia. It is one of two articles on closely related topics, created by a single-purpose account and largely edited by another single-purpose account. The article cites a reference to a research paper, which may contain mention of the concepts, but, even if it does, the fact that the authors of one paper have coined a concept and referred to it in that paper does not constitute substantial coverage, and arguably it is not an independent source either.

I had no part whatsoever in this research, and am only reporting on it. I have never met any of the people responsible for this research either. I was suprised to hear that you could find no reference to this topic elsewhere, as I have been taught about it in my university degree. This page is, as others have said before, a work in progress. Please do not delete

While all contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, content or articles may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the article to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:47, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

I had no part whatsoever in this research, and am only reporting on it. I have never met any of the people responsible for this research either. I was suprised to hear that you could find no reference to this topic elsewhere, as I have been taught about it in my university degree. This page is, as others have said before, a work in progress. Please do not delete

Conflict of interest

Hello, Maximus Fingolfin. We welcome your contributions to Wikipedia, but if you are affiliated with some of the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may need to consider our guidance on conflicts of interest.

All editors are required to comply with Wikipedia's neutral point of view content policy. People who are very close to a subject often have a distorted view of it, which may cause them to inadvertently edit in ways that make the article either too flattering or too disparaging. People with a close connection to a subject are not absolutely prohibited from editing about that subject, but they need to be especially careful about ensuring their edits are verified by reliable sources and writing with as little bias as possible.

If you are very close to a subject, here are some ways you can reduce the risk of problems:

Avoid or exercise great caution when editing or creating articles related to you, your organization, or its competitors, as well as projects and products they are involved with.
Be cautious about deletion discussions. Everyone is welcome to provide information about independent sources in deletion discussions, but avoid advocating for deletion of articles about your competitors.
Avoid linking to the Wikipedia article or website of your organization in other articles (see Wikipedia:Spam).
Exercise great caution so that you do not accidentally breach Wikipedia's content policies.

Please familiarize yourself with relevant content policies and guidelines, especially those pertaining to neutral point of view, verifiability of information, and autobiographies.

For information on how to contribute to Wikipedia when you have a conflict of interest, please see our frequently asked questions for organizations. JamesBWatson (talk) 11:50, 7 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Golgi voltage gates for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Golgi voltage gates is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Golgi voltage gates until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion template from the top of the article. JamesBWatson (talk) 10:49, 10 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Maximus Fingolfin, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Maximus Fingolfin! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! Doctree (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 01:17, 11 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome to Wikipedia. Please do not remove Articles for deletion notices from articles, or remove other people's comments in Articles for deletion debates, as you did with Golgi voltage gates. Otherwise, it may be difficult to create consensus. If you oppose the deletion of an article, please comment at the respective page instead. Thank you. Quasihuman (talk • contribs) 15:50, 16 December 2012 (UTC) Welcome![reply]

Hello, Maximus Fingolfin, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Unfortunately, one or more of your edits to the page Golgi apparatus have not conformed to Wikipedia's verifiability policy, and may be removed if they have not yet been. Wikipedia articles should refer only to facts and interpretations that have been stated in print or on reputable websites or other forms of media. Always remember to provide a reliable source for quotations and for any material that is likely to be challenged, or it may be removed. Wikipedia also has a related policy against including original research in articles. As well, all new biographies of living people must contain at least one reliable source.

If you are stuck and looking for help, please see the guide for citing sources or come to the new contributors' help page, where experienced Wikipedians can answer any queries you have! Or, you can just type {{helpme}} on your user page, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Here are a few other good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you have any questions, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question or ask me on my talk page. Again, welcome! Plantsurfer (talk) 18:49, 16 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing. Mean as custard (talk) 17:32, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

This is your last warning. The next time you vandalize Wikipedia, you may be blocked from editing without further notice. Mean as custard (talk) 17:34, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for abuse of editing privileges. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you may appeal this block by adding below this notice the text {{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}, but you should read the guide to appealing blocks first.

Materialscientist (talk) 22:51, 19 December 2012 (UTC)[reply]