User talk:MaxPower2017

Welcome!

Hello, MaxPower2017, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few links to pages you might find helpful:

You may also want to complete the Wikipedia Adventure, an interactive tour that will help you learn the basics of editing Wikipedia. You can visit the Teahouse to ask questions or seek help.

Please remember to sign your messages on talk pages by typing four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask for help on your talk page, and a volunteer should respond shortly. Again, welcome!--Biografer (talk) 19:14, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KCS Old Boys RFC (April 29)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KCS Old Boys RFC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:KCS Old Boys RFC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{db-self}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, MaxPower2017! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Jovanmilic97 (talk) 22:43, 29 April 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Draft:KCS Old Boys RFC concern

Hi there, I'm HasteurBot. I just wanted to let you know that Draft:KCS Old Boys RFC, a page you created, has not been edited in 5 months. The Articles for Creation space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for articlespace.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it.

You may request Userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available at WP:REFUND/G13.

Thank you for your attention. HasteurBot (talk) 01:21, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:KCS Old Boys RFC

Hello, MaxPower2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "KCS Old Boys RFC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CASSIOPEIA^(talk) 05:37, 31 October 2019 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: KCS Old Boys RFC (October 28)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Nightenbelle was:

This submission is not adequately supported by reliable sources. Reliable sources are required so that information can be verified. If you need help with referencing, please see Referencing for beginners and Citing sources.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Article relies very heavily on primary sources, which do not contribute to notability, and twitter- in fact all social media, is not an acceptable source.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:KCS Old Boys RFC and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:KCS Old Boys RFC, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Nightenbelle (talk) 20:36, 28 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:KCS Old Boys RFC

Hello, MaxPower2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "KCS Old Boys RFC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been nominated for deletion. If you plan on working on it further, or editing it to address the issues raised if it was declined, simply edit the submission and remove the {{db-afc}}, {{db-draft}}, or {{db-g13}} code.

If your submission has already been deleted by the time you get there, and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion by following the instructions at this link. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia! CommanderWaterford (talk) 20:55, 28 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hampshire 4 moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Hampshire 4, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Mccapra (talk) 21:28, 22 October 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:51, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Dorset & Wilts 2 Central moved to draftspace

An article you recently created, Dorset & Wilts 2 Central, is not suitable as written to remain published. It needs more citations from reliable, independent sources. (?) Information that can't be referenced should be removed (verifiability is of central importance on Wikipedia). I've moved your draft to draftspace (with a prefix of "Draft:" before the article title) where you can incubate the article with minimal disruption. When you feel the article meets Wikipedia's general notability guideline and thus is ready for mainspace, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page. Onel5969 ^{TT me} 16:01, 23 January 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:KCS Old Boys RFC

Hello, MaxPower2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "KCS Old Boys RFC".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 20:54, 8 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Hampshire 4

Hello, MaxPower2017. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Hampshire 4, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 22:02, 24 March 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Hampshire 4

Hello, MaxPower2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Hampshire 4".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 22:03, 22 April 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Dorset & Wilts 2 Central

Hello, MaxPower2017. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Dorset & Wilts 2 Central, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 16:02, 25 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Dorset & Wilts 2 Central

Hello, MaxPower2017. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Dorset & Wilts 2 Central".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 16:10, 23 July 2022 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:34, 29 November 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Counties 1 Durham & Northumberland for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Counties 1 Durham & Northumberland is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Counties 1 Durham & Northumberland until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

~~ Bcp67 (talk) 12:13, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Regional 2 South East for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Regional 2 South East is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Regional 2 South East until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article until the discussion has finished.

Bcp67 (talk) 12:21, 15 February 2023 (UTC)[reply]

April 2024

Hello, I'm Belbury. I noticed that you added or changed content in an article, Pauline Quirke, but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed and archived in the page history for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so. You can have a look at referencing for beginners. If you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you. Belbury (talk) 09:20, 15 April 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Counties 1 Surrey/Sussex moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Counties 1 Surrey/Sussex. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Waqar💬 14:30, 15 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Morning Waqar. Thanks for your message. As you'll have seen I anticipated this issue in the original editing comment I put on the page. As you'll see from my editing history I am trying to be an ally to community rugby in England, a sport that doesn't get media coverage - there are virtually no sources to validate the existence of leagues except from the governing body themselves, the RFU. I am at a complete loss as to how I can persuade Wikipedia that these these leagues exist and the teams included are participating in them. I can't provide links to BBC Sport or Sky Sport or The Times or The Telegraph, they simply don't exist. This is not malicious content, there is no attempt to spread disinformation, just a genuine fan trying to give a platform to clubs who otherwise have no online presence save for their own club website. You'll note that was a time a couple of years ago when every league in the 'system' section of the English Rugby Union System page was populated with details of teams competing. The RFU changed the league structure at the start of the 2022-23 season and since then the page has dozens of blanks pages. People like me are trying to reinstate the information and fill in the gaps. I can't tell you how frustrating and dispiriting it is to spend hours curating pages, getting maps right, uploading the details of clubs only to seen it all taken down the same day. I hope you can apply some discretion and reinstate the information I uploaded. Thank you. MaxPower2017 (talk) 09:08, 16 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Waqar. Have you had a chance to consider my message above? Thanks in advance MaxPower2017 (talk) 07:33, 22 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

MaxPower2017, if there is no source to verify what you have written on Counties 1 Surrey/Sussex, then it is not notable enough for Wikipedia. Please see Wikipedia:No original research. Jeraxmoira🐉 (talk) 13:44, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hi Jeraxmoira. Thanks for replying. The same logic could be applied to every community rugby league. As per my longer message above Wikipedia previously supported entries for all local leagues until c.2022 when the league structure changed. What sources do you require? There is a link to the RFU page confirming the existence of the league and the fixtures to be played. What, specifically, is required? Thanks in advance MaxPower2017 (talk) 14:48, 23 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for July 25

Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Counties 1 Southern North, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Windsor. Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)

It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, --DPL bot (talk) 08:36, 25 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Counties 1 Surrey/Sussex moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Counties 1 Surrey/Sussex. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it has no sources. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Boleyn (talk) 21:19, 26 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Morning Boleyn. Thanks for your message. As you'll have seen I anticipated this issue in the original editing comment I put on the page. As you'll see from my editing history I am trying to be an ally to community rugby in England, a sport that doesn't get media coverage - there are virtually no sources to validate the existence of leagues except from the governing body themselves, the RFU. I am at a complete loss as to how I can persuade Wikipedia that these these leagues exist and the teams included are participating in them. I can't provide links to BBC Sport or Sky Sport or The Times or The Telegraph, they simply don't exist. This is not malicious content, there is no attempt to spread disinformation, just a genuine fan trying to give a platform to clubs who otherwise have no online presence save for their own club website. You'll note that was a time a couple of years ago when every league in the 'system' section of the English Rugby Union System page was populated with details of teams competing. The RFU changed the league structure at the start of the 2022-23 season and since then the page has dozens of blanks pages. People like me are trying to reinstate the information and fill in the gaps. I can't tell you how frustrating and dispiriting it is to spend hours curating pages, getting maps right, uploading the details of clubs only to seen it all taken down the same day. I hope you can apply some discretion and reinstate the information I uploaded. Thank you. MaxPower2017 (talk) 10:22, 29 July 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Counties 1 Surrey / Sussex has been accepted

Counties 1 Surrey / Sussex, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 13:24, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you for accepting the creation of this page and the feedback - both much appreciated. MP17 MaxPower2017 (talk) 15:08, 13 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Counties 2 Sussex moved to draftspace

Thanks for your contributions to Counties 2 Sussex. Unfortunately, I do not think it is ready for publishing at this time because it needs more sources to establish notability. I have converted your article to a draft which you can improve, undisturbed for a while.

Please see more information at Help:Unreviewed new page. When the article is ready for publication, please click on the "Submit your draft for review!" button at the top of the page OR move the page back. Chaotic Enby (talk · contribs) 12:49, 14 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Counties 2 Sussex has been accepted

Counties 2 Sussex, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.

Congratulations, and thank you for helping expand the scope of Wikipedia! We hope you will continue making quality contributions.

The article has been assessed as C-Class, which is recorded on its talk page. This is a great rating for a new article, and places it among the top 21% of accepted submissions — kudos to you! You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

Since you have made at least 10 edits over more than four days, you can now create articles yourself without posting a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk. Once you have made at least 10 edits and had an account for at least four days, you will have the option to create articles yourself without posting a request to Articles for creation.

If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thanks again, and happy editing!

Utopes _{(talk / cont)} 12:07, 15 August 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for September 3

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Devon League 1, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Topsham.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:54, 3 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Barnstar

		The Original Barnstar
		For your excellent work in updating and creating English rugby union league articles Bcp67 (talk) 19:29, 9 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Thank you - much appreciated. Trying to backfill the English Rugby Union System page is not a straightforward thing since there is very little coverage of the clubs so finding sources is a painstaking business but I am motivated to try since all the clubs, big or small, deserve to be recognised for their achievements / participation.

One QQ for you - I *think* I have resubmitted a Draft page for KCS Old Boys RFC - I created it a while ago then it was archived and I requested it to come out so I could work on it which I did today but can't tell if it has has now gone off for review or if it is just sat as a a draft. Are you able to see / advise?

Many thanks, MP17 MaxPower2017 (talk) 15:10, 11 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I can see the draft and I think it needs resubmitting - I took a look at WP:AFCREVIEW and there was an instruction there to add the submit for review button to the article. I've done that on your draft and it looks like it has been submitted. Good luck with it this time. Bcp67 (talk) 18:04, 12 September 2024 (UTC)[reply]

The draft has been accepted and your article is now in mainspace - KCS Old Boys RFC. Bcp67 (talk) 07:06, 24 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Brilliant - thank you again for your support / encouragement - much appreciated MaxPower2017 (talk) 13:40, 31 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Disambiguation link notification for October 30

An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Hampshire 2, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page Farnborough.

(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 19:56, 30 October 2024 (UTC)[reply]