User talk:Mahakaal2003

If you want to interact with me, you can leave me a message here. Thank you!

Your submission at Articles for creation: Happy Child High School, Rehabari (August 19)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Dan arndt was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject. Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Fails WP:NSCHOOL, requires significant coverage not merely mentions in passing.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Happy Child High School, Rehabari and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Happy Child High School, Rehabari, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Dan arndt (talk) 07:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Mahakaal2003! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Dan arndt (talk) 07:27, 19 August 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Notification of discretionary sanctions

This is a standard message to notify contributors about an administrative ruling in effect. It does not imply that there are any issues with your contributions to date.

You have shown interest in India, Pakistan, and Afghanistan. Due to past disruption in this topic area, a more stringent set of rules called discretionary sanctions is in effect. Any administrator may impose sanctions on editors who do not strictly follow Wikipedia's policies, or the page-specific restrictions, when making edits related to the topic.

For additional information, please see the guidance on discretionary sanctions and the Arbitration Committee's decision here. If you have any questions, or any doubts regarding what edits are appropriate, you are welcome to discuss them with me or any other editor.

—SpacemanSpiff 16:17, 8 October 2020 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2020 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 7 December 2020. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2020 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 02:56, 24 November 2020 (UTC)[reply]

Bodo-Kachari and Mech

I have reverted your edits in Bodo-Kachari people on Mech language because the sources are not reliable—one is a government website written by non-experts (with additional information that are clearly wrong) and the other is an article in a predatory journal. Linguists like Jacquesson also do not frontally address the issue. They do at times say that Mech is similar to Boro but also mention them separately. We have to wait for the linguists to say definitely what Mech language is. But it is good to remember that there are many different issues involved here, political as well as sociolinguistics. So it is right to just wait till a reliable source says something definite. Chaipau (talk) 11:53, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

I have reverted your changes in Mech people for the same reason. It is best to wait for reliable sources on this. Chaipau (talk) 12:38, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Please use Ethnologue and Glottolog to determine the status of Mech. But be careful that Boro is associated with the Boro people whereas the Mech is more diffuse and covers a wide range geographically. So is the Mech spoken in Nepal same as Boro or is it more/less different than Boro is from Dimasa? Some of these answers are probably not available but we should be sensitive to them. Chaipau (talk) 13:23, 10 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

@Chaipau: Thanks a lot to clear my doubts! I have emailed linguist Toulmin and requested him to look into this matter as soon as possible. If the Mech people have a language of their own, they should definitely get the right to counter the claims of the Boro people (of it being a dialect of Boro language). I hope that this problem gets solved soon. Mahakaal2003 (talk) 03:25, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Recently, we are facing another issue. The Assam Legislative Assembly has passed a bill to create a welfare council for the Boro people living outside BTAD. But, it has been named Bodo Kachari Bodo Kachari Welfare Autonomous Council. It would be very confusing for others to find out whether the Government is talking about the Boro people or the greater Bodo-Kachari group of the Tibeto-Burman family. What should we do? Should we create a disambiguation page? Mahakaal2003 (talk) 03:35, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

You could get in touch with linguists who are working on Tibeto-Burman languages too.
No, we do not need to disambiguate. It will be understood that Bodo Kachari in BKWAC means Boro Kachari, as given in the census.

Chaipau (talk) 03:48, 11 April 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2021 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 6 December 2021. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2021 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 01:00, 23 November 2021 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message

Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}} to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:59, 28 November 2023 (UTC)[reply]