User talk:Kirkgaard
Welcome!
[edit]![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() Hello, Kirkgaard, and welcome to Wikipedia! I am Sam Sailor and I would like to thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:
Remember to always sign your posts on talk pages. You can do this either by clicking on the The best way to learn about something is to experience it. Explore, learn, contribute, and don't forget to have some fun! To get some practice editing you can use a sandbox. You can create your own private sandbox for use any time. Perfect for working on bigger projects. Then for easy access in the future, you can put There are many ways you can contribute to Wikipedia. Here are a few ideas:
If you need further help, you can: or even: Alternatively, place
Again, welcome, and happy editing!
This welcome message was sent by Sam Sailor Sing 14:44, 26 March 2014 (UTC) |
Og velkommen! :) The official spelling is I.C. Møllerparken. Both the punctuation and spacing is standard use for Danish place names, cf. H.C. Ørstedsparken. Before moving it to I.C. Møllerparken I thought I'd hear if you had any objections? Best, Sam Sailor Sing 14:54, 26 March 2014 (UTC)
- Thanks Sam, for the fruit as well as the corrections ;). Actually, my conclusion after looking into the municipal documentation was the opposite. Esbjerg Kommune refer to the park as IC Møllerparken in their most official writings (including the signs present in the park area). But, as the rest of the world, in some of their more public writings they also use the grammatically correct I. C. or I.C. just as much. I haven't been able to find the official notes on the name decision in the city counsil, but I'll write someone in there and get a confirmation, seems they need it themselves too ;). Until then, let's just keep it at I.C., which suits my speling-gene best too. God dag. Kirkgaard (talk) 10:43, 9 April 2014 (UTC)
- The naming convention is set out in Vejledning i retskrivning af vejnavne and Esbjerg Municipality follows it cf. "I.C. Møllerparken klar til indvielse". Esbjergkommune.dk. 2013-06-19. I'm not surprised that it sometimes get spelled "IC Møllerparken" or "I. C. Møllerparken", as we can see in this search result, but that does not make it correct, and I don't believe we have a case for WP:UCN discussion here. Best, Sam Sailor Sing 10:33, 10 April 2014 (UTC)
Hello, Kirkgaard. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Tabula (software), for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:
- edit the page
- remove the text that looks like this:
{{proposed deletion/dated...}}
- save the page
Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.
You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.
Domdeparis (talk) 17:25, 2 June 2017 (UTC)
Thanks for your help with the wording and language on the timeline for the documentary film release dates.2602:306:CE27:DC90:2D64:7486:8B39:96F8 (talk) 10:40, 6 February 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Presearch (search engine) for deletion
[edit]![](http://up.wiki.x.io/wikipedia/en/thumb/5/5f/Ambox_warning_orange.svg/48px-Ambox_warning_orange.svg.png)
A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Presearch (search engine) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Presearch (search engine) until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. MER-C 19:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
A community decision has authorised the use of general sanctions for pages related to the blockchain and cryptocurrencies. The details of these sanctions are described here. All pages that are broadly related to these topics are subject to a one revert per twenty-four hours restriction, as described here.
General sanctions is a system of conduct regulation designed to minimise disruption in controversial topic areas. This means uninvolved administrators can impose sanctions for edits relating to these topics that do not adhere to the purpose of Wikipedia, our standards of behaviour, or relevant policies. Administrators may impose sanctions such as editing restrictions, bans, or blocks. An editor can only be sanctioned after he or she has been made aware that general sanctions are in effect. This notification is meant to inform you that sanctions are authorised in these topic areas, which you have been editing. It is only effective if it is logged here. Before continuing to edit pages in these topic areas, please familiarise yourself with the general sanctions system. Don't hesitate to contact me or another editor if you have any questions.MER-C 19:38, 17 June 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 election voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for March 7
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited OSADL, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page TSN (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver).
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 12:49, 7 March 2020 (UTC)
Danish Wikipedia
[edit]Can you support this Danish page, because after some time it will be deleted "Maskinoversættelse og/eller tvivlsomt indhold" and "Denne side virker ikke som en encyklopædisk artikel" on this page http://da.wiki.x.io/wiki/Dansk_tilbagetr%C3%A6kning_fra_EU ? Wname1 (talk) 18:06, 21 July 2020 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]Disambiguation link notification for December 18
[edit]An automated process has detected that when you recently edited Comparison of MQTT implementations, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page RTX.
(Opt-out instructions.) --DPL bot (talk) 06:17, 18 December 2020 (UTC)
IBM MQ edit
[edit]Hi, I reverted your edit to IBM MQ which added a new paragraph to the opening section. It said that it was open sourced and became MQTT. But according to the MQTT article, it's actually a separate product that was only called "MQ" for branding (it doesn't even use queues!). It's still relevant to the IBM MQ article but misleading to say that it was open sourced when really just this different thing with a similar name was (unless IBM MQ was as well?) 80.4.108.48 (talk) 17:32, 5 February 2021 (UTC)
ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2023 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2023 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 11 December 2023. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2023 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:30, 28 November 2023 (UTC)