Jump to content

User talk:Khcaliy

Page contents not supported in other languages.
From Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

Your submission at Articles for creation: Procedure Linkage Table (January 30)

[edit]
Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed. Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Rambley was: Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.
Rambley (talk) 10:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Teahouse logo
Hello, Khcaliy! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Rambley (talk) 10:43, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Hello Rambley, thanks for your review and comment. However there seems a mistake my sources are most reliable sources for the subject. These kinda of subjects are technical to most readers it related to binary and low level.
Anyway believe me if there is some documentation for there then they are those documentations. I don't get why Oracle and Intel documentation aren't the most trusted sources, please i need more clarification Khcaliy (talk) 12:47, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
You haven't provided any inline citations for the article. These are required to verify claims made within. See Help:Referencing for beginners and WP:CITE. Additionally, I haven't seen any sources to prove how this is notable aside from documentation. Rambley (talk) 13:39, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
Okay! noted about inline citation. But what other sources needed aside from documentation, there are many blogs online, and i can take snippets from the binary it's self. However is snippet code of the binary enough most trusted source is visual of binary it's self. Should i include snippet code about binary PLT. Thanks for your patience and apologies for inconvenience . Khcaliy (talk) 13:54, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
If you cannot find reliable sources, then you should not be writing a Wikipedia article on it. Articles are written for topics that are notable; that is, topics that have been covered by several secondary, reliable sources that have provided significant coverage. See WP:NOTABLE.
Additionally, blogs are typically not considered reliable sources unless written by a trusted critic or reviewer. See WP:UGC. Rambley (talk) 13:59, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
@Rambley Didn't find any references to my question, so are images and code snippets can be used as citation? Khcaliy (talk) 14:19, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]
While images and code snippets can be help to illustrate a point, they are not typically used as citations and I advise against doing so. Once again, you need to find reliable secondary sources about the topic; this is how all articles on Wikipedia are written. Rambley (talk) 14:21, 30 January 2025 (UTC)[reply]

Your thread has been archived

[edit]
Teahouse logo

Hello Khcaliy! The thread you created at the Teahouse, Article reference of trusted sources, has been archived because there was no discussion for a few days.

You can still read the archived discussion. If you have follow-up questions, please create a new thread.

See also the help page about the archival process. The archival was done by lowercase sigmabot III, and this notification was delivered by KiranBOT, both automated accounts. You can opt out of future notifications by placing {{bots|deny=KiranBOT}} on top of the current page (your user talk page). —KiranBOT (talk) 03:24, 4 February 2025 (UTC)[reply]