User talk:Kbradnam

Welcome!

Hello, Kbradnam, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your name on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically produce your name and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Where to ask a question, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on your talk page and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Again, welcome! Johntex 20:48, 29 August 2005 (UTC)[reply]

Regarding the picture Image:C.elegans worm.png, I am afraid I have to ask: did you create the image, or are you otherwise in a position to release it under the Creative Commons license? (The website you are listing as its source contains no evidence of it using any CC license, and its copyright policy page prohibits commercial use without a permission of Wormatlas editors.) Thank you. - Mike Rosoft 21:52, 5 September 2006 (UTC)[reply]

Possibly unfree Image:Adult worm.jpg

An image that you uploaded or altered, Image:Adult worm.jpg, has been listed at Wikipedia:Possibly unfree images because its copyright status is disputed. If the image's copyright status cannot be verified, it may be deleted. Please go to its page for more information if you are interested in it not being deleted. Thank you. Hipocrite - «Talk» 15:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Hipocrite - «Talk» 15:07, 14 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

[Keith, first and foremost please note that I am not qualified to give legal advice.] Ms. Alton should read Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. She must license the content she is willing to donate to Wikipedia under the GNU Free Documentation License or a license that is compatible with it (Creative Commons license, BSD license, or release into the public domain). Please especially note that "I give permission for this content to be used on Wikipedia" is not sufficient. We require a clear, affirmative statement that the copyright owner is licensing the content under the GFDL (or other GFDL-compatible license). Finally, Ms. Alton must either: (1) explicitly note that the images are licensed as such on her website or (2) e-mail Wikipedia at permissions-en at wikimedia dot org. Any other questions? --Iamunknown 23:08, 15 February 2007 (UTC)[reply]

Question

Hi. I had supplied an inline citation in wiki form to the Amber Rubarth article. I noticed that you just undid that -- was just wondering if that may have been unintentional?--Epeefleche (talk) 18:20, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Oh I'm sorry. I was editing the article at the same time as you and it reported that there was a potential conflict but I couldn't see what it was. Purely unintentional. My apologies. Nod (talk) 18:34, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

I reinstated your change Nod (talk) 20:19, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

Not a problem.--Epeefleche (talk) 20:20, 14 October 2009 (UTC)[reply]

February 2014

Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to N50 statistic may have broken the syntax by modifying 1 "()"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.

List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:

genome from the fictional species A was 500 Kbp, then the ''NG50'' contig length would be 30 Kbp (80 + 70 + 50 + 40 + 30 is greater than 50% of 500 Kbp. In contrast, if the estimated or known size

Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 18:05, 18 February 2014 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 12:52, 23 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Kbradnam. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. Mdann52 (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom 2017 election voter message

Hello, Kbradnam. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)[reply]