User talk:K. Badri Vishal
Recent edit to Quake (natural phenomenon)
[edit]
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. I noticed that you made a change to an article, Quake (natural phenomenon), but you didn't provide a reliable source. It's been removed for now, but if you'd like to include a citation and re-add it, please do so! If you need guidance on referencing, please see the referencing for beginners tutorial, or if you think I made a mistake, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thank you! Materialscientist (talk) 10:16, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
[edit] Hello, I'm Conana007. I wanted to let you know that I reverted one of your recent contributions —the one you made with this edit to Quake (natural phenomenon)— because it did not appear constructive. If you would like to experiment, please use the sandbox. If you think I made a mistake, or if you have any questions, you can leave me a message on my talk page. Thanks. Conana007 (talk) 10:28, 9 May 2017 (UTC)
K. Badri Vishal, you are invited to the Teahouse!
[edit]
|
Hi K. Badri Vishal! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia. We hope to see you there!
Delivered by HostBot on behalf of the Teahouse hosts 22:02, 9 May 2017 (UTC) |
Speedy deletion nomination of Abellaite
[edit]
If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
Hello, and welcome to Wikipedia. This is a notice to inform you that a tag has been placed on Abellaite requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section A1 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because it is a very short article providing little or no context to the reader. Please see Wikipedia:Stub for our minimum information standards for short articles. Also please note that articles must be on notable subjects and should provide references to reliable sources that verify their content.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. —KuyaBriBriTalk 15:26, 12 May 2017 (UTC)
Please do not add original research or novel syntheses of published material to articles. Please cite a reliable source for all of your contributions. Thank you. Materialscientist (talk) 05:23, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Please do not remove references from pages on Wikipedia, as you did to Tornado, without giving a valid reason for the removal in the edit summary. Your content removal does not appear to be constructive and has been reverted. If you only meant to make a test edit, please use the sandbox for that. Also please cite a reliable source when you add material, yahoo answers does not count as a reliable source. Thank you. Tornado chaser (talk) 14:59, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Welcome!
[edit]
|
May 2017
[edit]
Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Quake (natural phenomenon). This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. bonadea contributions talk 15:14, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Tornado. --David Biddulph (talk) 15:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
Helpful advice
[edit]It appears that you may be trying to make useful edits but are making mistakes, which is normal when you'r new to wikipedia, but a pattern of rookie mistakes could be mistaken for vandalism and lead to you being blocked from editing. I don't think your a vandal but to avoid being mistaken for one and being blocked, you should familiarize yourself with the policies and info below before you edit any more pages. If you have any questions don't hesitate to ask me by leaving a message on my talk page (click on "talk" next to my username) Tornado chaser (talk) 15:33, 22 May 2017 (UTC)
|
For information on adding references, see wp:cite and pages it links to help:referencing for beginners and help:footnotes. You can use wp:RefToolbar/2.0 to use the wp:template template:cite web.
Your link just went to the main page and did not include any information on Mars-quakes that I could see. You added http://astrobio.net > mars > morden-marsquakes Did you mean http://astrobio.net/mars/morden-marsquakes which is 404 or http://astrobio.net/mars/modern-marsquakes which does link to an article?
I did not see any mention of "core" or "shrink" on http://astrobio.net/mars/modern-marsquakes The source needs, per wp:verifiability, to support significant information added to the article. I suspect with the little amount of information we have on Mars that the actual cause of quakes is under debate. About all we know it they probably exist. Whether they are cause by core shrinkage or something else that we don't understand is likely not known. Making a guess would be wp:original research or synthesis and should not be used on Wikipedia.
Please try to maintain the wp:tone and style of speech in an article and especially in a paragraph. I see you have found the wp:teahouse. Best regards Jim1138 (talk) 05:17, 23 May 2017 (UTC)
Teahouse talkback: you've got messages!
[edit]
Please note that all old questions are archived after 2-3 days of inactivity. Message added by — Gestrid (talk) 21:59, 23 May 2017 (UTC). (You can remove this notice at any time by removing the {{teahouse talkback}} template).
May 2017
[edit] You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you violate Wikipedia's no original research policy by inserting unpublished information or your personal analysis into an article, as you did at Moon. TheSandDoctor (talk) 04:26, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Please do not use Daily Mail as a reference of scientific information on this wiki. Materialscientist (talk) 05:33, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Materialscientist (talk) 07:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
References
[edit]Adding references is how we ensure that content is valid. Without references, a reader can not easily validate information and there is no presumption of accuracy. See Help:Referencing for beginners and Help:footnotes. This is covered by the Wikipedia policy of wp:verifiability (WP:V). Please wp:cite your edits with wp:reliable sources (RS). Per WP:V unsourced content can be removed. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 07:38, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
- Also, I watched the video. The two-moons-not-one is a theory. It is speculation. You were writing it like it was a proven fact. There is a difference. --‖ Ebyabe talk - General Health ‖ 07:56, 24 May 2017 (UTC)
May 2017
[edit]{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}. Drmies (talk) 16:09, 25 May 2017 (UTC)- Despite the advice given to you by Justlettersandnumbers, you can not use that kind of source (a Discovery documentary narrated by Mike Rowe?), certainly not in a Featured Article. If you wish to be unblocked, it will only be after a firm commitment to the understand and proper application of our policy on reliable sources (WP:RS). If you do not see how printed, published scientific, peer-reviewed books are acceptable sources and TV documentaries are not, it is not likely to happen. Drmies (talk) 16:13, 25 May 2017 (UTC)
{{unblock|reason=Your reason here ~~~~}}.