User talk:Jhnns

Proposed deletion of Martin Bucer European Theological Seminary and Research Institutes

Hello, Re145vision. I wanted to let you know that I’m proposing an article that you started, Martin Bucer European Theological Seminary and Research Institutes, for deletion because I don't think it meets our criteria for inclusion. If you don't want the article deleted:

edit the page
remove the text that looks like this: {{proposed deletion/dated...}}
save the page

Also, be sure to explain why you think the article should be kept in your edit summary or on the article's talk page. If you don't do so, it may be deleted later anyway.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions.

Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 12:22, 17 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Kudpung, the Martin Bucer European Theological Seminary and Research Institutes is a remarkable place of training because of its concept of training. It is further – as far as I know – one of the few – maybe even the only – christian theological seminary with a main focus on islamic studies. Besides, the research on religious freedom and persecution of christians are main topics of the research of the institute – and are well known in Europe. So I think this institution ist worthy of notice. I will try to work on this article to underline that. Greetings! --Re145vision (talk) 13:27, 21 March 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Martin Bucer European Theological Seminary and Research Institutes for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Martin Bucer European Theological Seminary and Research Institutes is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Martin Bucer European Theological Seminary and Research Institutes until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Kudpung กุดผึ้ง (talk) 06:31, 1 May 2017 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Christine Schirrmacher

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Christine Schirrmacher, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:

It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service or person and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Business for more information.
It appears to be a clear copyright infringement of http://www.worldea.org/whoweare/leadership/christine-schirrmacher. (See section G12 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) For legal reasons, we cannot accept copyrighted text or images borrowed from other web sites or printed material, and as a consequence, your addition will most likely be deleted. You may use external websites as a source of information, but not as a source of sentences. This part is crucial: say it in your own words. Wikipedia takes copyright violations very seriously and persistent violators will be blocked from editing.
If the external website belongs to you, and you want to allow Wikipedia to use the text — which means allowing other people to modify it — then you must verify that externally by one of the processes explained at Wikipedia:Donating copyrighted materials. If you are not the owner of the external website but have permission from that owner, see Wikipedia:Requesting copyright permission. However, even if you use one of these processes to release copyrighted material to Wikipedia, it still needs to comply with the other policies and guidelines to be eligible for inclusion. If you would like any assistance with this, you can ask a question at the help desk.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. CHRISSYMAD ❯❯❯¯\_(ツ)_/¯ 15:13, 16 March 2018 (UTC)[reply]

Hello! On point 1: This article is a biography of living person. Where do you see a special kind of promotion? On pont 2: Could you please specify the copyright allegation? The website you mentioned does not exist and at least I have not taken any content from there - perhaps the other way round. Thank you! Jhnns (talk) 14:16, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Notice of Conflict of interest noticeboard discussion

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Conflict of interest/Noticeboard regarding a possible conflict of interest incident with which you may be involved. The thread is Thomas Schirrmacher. The discussion is about the topic Topic. Thank you. —Biohistorian15 (talk) 13:41, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Hello Biohistorian15. I deal a lot with the work of Thomas Schirrmacher, so I also edit his Wikipedia entry accordingly. However, I mainly work on the German Wikipedia, where I also edit articles on completely different topics. Therefore, in the English Wikipedia it probably looks as if I am only editing Thomas Schirrmacher's article. To the best of my knowledge, however, I have never entered anything incorrect in Wikipedia. Jhnns (talk) 14:03, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I see. A fair bit of your posts over there seem to be similar though. Biohistorian15 (talk) 17:31, 7 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Yes, theology is my main subject. Jhnns (talk) 12:21, 8 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

I still don't understand what the problem is with the content of the article? The fact that I worked a lot on the article doesn't mean that I'm a fan or that the content is factually incorrect or one-sided. Therefore, if there are problems with the content, I would ask you to name them so that they can be corrected. But simply because a person has worked a lot on an article or subject, to imply that it is unobjective is not fair in my opinion! Best regards! Jhnns (talk) 08:21, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Tbh, your German contributions are a key argument I simply overlooked at first. Maybe mention this one more time on the COI(-)N and the topic will likely be archived. Biohistorian15 (talk) 12:24, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]

Ok, thanks! Jhnns (talk) 12:27, 10 June 2024 (UTC)[reply]