User talk:JIP/Archive 34
Your signature
[edit]Please be aware that your signature uses deprecated <font>
tags, which are causing Obsolete HTML tags lint errors.
You are encouraged to change
[[User:JIP|<font color="#CC0000">J</font><font color="#00CC00">I</font><font color="#0000CC">P</font>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]]
: JIP | Talk
to
[[User:JIP|<span style="color: #CC0000;">J</span><span style="color: #00CC00;">I</span><span style="color: #0000CC;">P</span>]] | [[User talk:JIP|Talk]]
: JIP | Talk
—Anomalocaris (talk) 18:06, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- Thank you for updating your signature! —Anomalocaris (talk) 02:33, 19 February 2018 (UTC)
Hiya!
[edit]I have boldy edited your userpage. Hope you can forgive me. (((The Quixotic Potato))) (talk) 18:24, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
- There is no need to apologise. Constructive edits to my userpage are welcome. I just dislike obvious vandalism. JIP | Talk 22:11, 19 December 2017 (UTC)
The article Stockmann, Tampere has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While the company is undoubtedly notable, not every individual location of it is. There are not enough sources available about this location specifically to justify a standalone article about it. The Finnish article has only one independent source, and it's an announcement about renovations being complete.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:57, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
The article Stockmann, Turku has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While the company is undoubtedly notable, not every individual location of it is. There are not enough sources available about this location specifically (or really any of the others) to justify a standalone article about it. The Finnish article for this location has no independent sources to swipe.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 15:59, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
The article Stockmann, Tapiola has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
While the company is undoubtedly notable, not every individual location of it is. There are not enough independent sources available about this location specifically (or really any of the others) to justify a standalone article about it. The Finnish article for this location has a few sources, but they're either the company's website or local announcements. Nothing that would indicate there is a specific historical interest in this location.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 16:03, 24 February 2018 (UTC)
Rhyme Syndicate
[edit]Hello, User:JIP! Can I get the information, which was in the article about Rhyme Syndicate back in the 2009 (and 2011)? I want to create an article about the record label Rhyme $yndicate (which was founded in 1988 by Ice-T). Could you send me the info into my talk page? Thank you. ♠Dat Gee♠ (talk), 25 February 2018
Nomination of Stockmann, Tampere for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stockmann, Tampere is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stockmann, Tampere until a consensus is reached, and anyone is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 05:25, 2 March 2018 (UTC)
Therese Karlsson
[edit]Olet joskus ammoin muuttanut nimen muotoon Thérèse. Useimpien (nyky) lähteiden, muun muassa Uppslagsverket.fi:n, mukaan nimi on kuitenkin Therese. Voisitko korjata, koska en voi en.wikissä tehdä siirtoja. Hän ei myöskään ole ahvenanmaalainen, koska on syntynyt Paraisilla, joka on Turun saaristoa. Sen oli kirjoittanut toinen tunnus kylläkin. --Ottilia Puttonen (talk) 15:54, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
- Tehty. Olin näköjään muuttanut sivun päivälleen 12 vuotta sitten, 23. huhtikuuta 2006. Ongelmana vain on että sivulla on wikilinkki ruotsalaiseen sivuun sv:Thérèse Karlsson, enkä voi siirtää sitä sivulle sv:Therese Karlsson koska se kertoo nykyisin kokonaan eri henkilöstä, ruotsalaisesta miljardööristä. Laitoin asiasta ruotsalaisen Wikipedian avunpyyntösivulle kysymyksen. JIP | Talk 17:19, 23 April 2018 (UTC)
Musicinfo
[edit]Moi, kerkeetkö tsekkaa ne kaks suomenkielistä lähdettä tästä artikkelista? http://en.wiki.x.io/wiki/Draft:Musicinfo Eli pitäisi tarkistaa, että lähteet tukevat artikkelin väitteitä ja että ne vastaavat wikipedian laatuvaatimuksia.BridgeScript (talk) 08:56, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
- En ole vielä ehtinyt. Yritän tehdä sen kesäkuun loppuun mennessä. JIP | Talk 23:03, 27 June 2018 (UTC)
OK, tee kun kerkeät! Kiitoksia! BridgeScript (talk) 11:12, 5 July 2018 (UTC)
Miltä näyttää sun aikataulut, kerkeetkö kattomaan? Pitäis olla ihan parin minuutin juttu :) BridgeScript (talk) 09:48, 3 August 2018 (UTC)
Nevermind, poistin suomenkieliset lähteet kokonaan. BridgeScript (talk) 08:57, 7 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Stavros Fasoulas for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Stavros Fasoulas is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Stavros Fasoulas until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lordtobi (✉) 15:36, 25 August 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of List of tourist attractions in Helsinki for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of tourist attractions in Helsinki is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of tourist attractions in Helsinki until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. » Shadowowl | talk 20:39, 7 September 2018 (UTC)
Nomination of Space Pilot for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Space Pilot is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Space Pilot until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Lordtobi (✉) 20:36, 14 September 2018 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Space Pilot Screenshot.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Space Pilot Screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 02:54, 7 October 2018 (UTC)
The article Merike has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable given name. Only one article starts with it so not useful as a disambig.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 14:09, 10 November 2018 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, JIP. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Eurosinkut
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Eurosinkut, requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, group, product, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator. ♠PMC♠ (talk) 06:49, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
- I've deleted this. I know you are an admin, but the article lacked any independent verifiable sources to enable us to verify the facts and show that it meets the notability guidelines. Sources that are not acceptable include those linked to the organisation, press releases, YouTube, IMDB, social media and other sites that can be self-edited, blogs, websites of unknown or non-reliable provenance, and sites that are just reporting what the organisation claims or interviewing its management.
- You may not be aware that the notability guidelines for organisations and companies have been updated recently. The primary criteria has five components that must be evaluated separately and independently to determine if it is met:
- significant coverage in
- independent,
- multiple,
- reliable,
- secondary sources.
- Note that an individual source must meet all four criteria to be counted towards notability. In the absence of any independent third-party sources, the topic has no evidence of notability and is just an unsourced promo.
- Jimfbleak - talk to me? 07:02, 3 January 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of The Echo, the Arrow and the Chain for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article The Echo, the Arrow and the Chain is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/The Echo, the Arrow and the Chain until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. Mccapra (talk) 10:03, 6 January 2019 (UTC)
Your old joke redirects
[edit]I just nominated a bunch of your very old redirects from 2005 to deletion. Please see Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2019 January 13 and discussion in Finnish language Wikipedia fi:Wikipedia:Kahvihuone (sekalaista)#Wikidata levittää eli tapaus Harja Talonen about this. I also speedily deleted Vihannes Jorolainen. I suggest you clean up any remaining ones by yourself. jni (delete)...just not interested 13:40, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- I just went through every single page I had ever created and deleted all the redirects I had created that I thought were jocular and useless. JIP | Talk 14:33, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- It is not jocular or joke, if you're calling living person as a vegetable. That's an insult. You also called same other person as a creep. You're an admin here, so shame on you. --Well educated male from Europe (talk) 20:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- We're talking about 14 year old things here. Why couldn't this have been brought up earlier? I have not created any insulting redirects since then. And anyway, they were not my own inventions. People here in Finland have used them, and other such names, for decades. Anyway, I'm sorry for ever having created them. Can I go delete the insulting redirects under discussion right away? JIP | Talk 21:55, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
- It is not jocular or joke, if you're calling living person as a vegetable. That's an insult. You also called same other person as a creep. You're an admin here, so shame on you. --Well educated male from Europe (talk) 20:10, 13 January 2019 (UTC)
DOTY articles
[edit]Hi. Since July 2018, new entries in DOTY articles must include an inline citation backing up the date. That's why I reverted your latest addition. Deb (talk) 09:47, 19 March 2019 (UTC)
Speedy deletion nomination of Naturist Club of Finland
[edit]If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.
A tag has been placed on Naturist Club of Finland, requesting that it be deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under two or more of the criteria for speedy deletion, by which pages can be deleted at any time, without discussion. If the page meets any of these strictly-defined criteria, then it may soon be deleted by an administrator. The reasons it has been tagged are:
- It seems to be unambiguous advertising which only promotes a company, product, group, service, person, or point of view and would need to be fundamentally rewritten in order to become encyclopedic. (See section G11 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Please read the guidelines on spam and Wikipedia:FAQ/Organizations for more information.
- It appears to be about a person, organization (band, club, company, etc.), individual animal, or web content, but it does not indicate how or why the subject is important or significant: that is, why an article about that subject should be included in an encyclopedia. (See section A7 of the criteria for speedy deletion.) Such articles may be deleted at any time. Please see the guidelines for what is generally accepted as notable.
If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. SITH (talk) 19:05, 27 March 2019 (UTC)
Your help desk question
[edit]You didn't get a response to this question. Did you find the help you needed, since I don't have any idea how to answer?— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 21:45, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- No. No one left me any message and I didn't find any answer elsewhere. I'm tempted just to split off The Evil Horde as a separate article and leave a "main article" link at both the He-Man and the She-Ra articles. JIP | Talk 22:52, 22 April 2019 (UTC)
- I guess if no one objects you have your answer.— Vchimpanzee • talk • contributions • 15:55, 23 April 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of List of Transformers planets for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article List of Transformers planets is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/List of Transformers planets until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. DonIago (talk) 14:25, 28 April 2019 (UTC)
ArbCom 2019 special circular
[edit]Administrators must secure their accounts
The Arbitration Committee may require a new RfA if your account is compromised.
|
This message was sent to all administrators following a recent motion. Thank you for your attention. For the Arbitration Committee, Cameron11598 02:25, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Administrator account security (Correction to Arbcom 2019 special circular)
[edit]ArbCom would like to apologise and correct our previous mass message in light of the response from the community.
Since November 2018, six administrator accounts have been compromised and temporarily desysopped. In an effort to help improve account security, our intention was to remind administrators of existing policies on account security — that they are required to "have strong passwords and follow appropriate personal security practices." We have updated our procedures to ensure that we enforce these policies more strictly in the future. The policies themselves have not changed. In particular, two-factor authentication remains an optional means of adding extra security to your account. The choice not to enable 2FA will not be considered when deciding to restore sysop privileges to administrator accounts that were compromised.
We are sorry for the wording of our previous message, which did not accurately convey this, and deeply regret the tone in which it was delivered.
For the Arbitration Committee, -Cameron11598 21:03, 4 May 2019 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free image File:Top Hat Willy Screenshot.png
[edit]Thanks for uploading File:Top Hat Willy Screenshot.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 18:02, 10 May 2019 (UTC)
Disambiguation link notification for May 20
[edit]Hi. Thank you for your recent edits. An automated process has detected that when you recently edited List of band name etymologies, you added a link pointing to the disambiguation page WSOY (check to confirm | fix with Dab solver). Such links are usually incorrect, since a disambiguation page is merely a list of unrelated topics with similar titles. (Read the FAQ • Join us at the DPL WikiProject.)
It's OK to remove this message. Also, to stop receiving these messages, follow these opt-out instructions. Thanks, DPL bot (talk) 11:59, 20 May 2019 (UTC)
Deletion review for Jean-Claude Irvoas
[edit]An editor has asked for a deletion review of Jean-Claude Irvoas. Because you closed the deletion discussion for this page, speedily deleted it, or otherwise were interested in the page, you might want to participate in the deletion review. -- The Man Known as Rektroth (talk) 00:22, 22 May 2019 (UTC)
Klin-ton listed at Redirects for discussion
[edit]An editor has asked for a discussion to address the redirect Klin-ton. Since you had some involvement with the Klin-ton redirect, you might want to participate in the redirect discussion if you wish to do so. — the Man in Question (in question) 18:56, 10 July 2019 (UTC)
The article Nightbeat (Transformers) has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:
Non-notable fictional character.
While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.
You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}}
notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.
Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}}
will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. TTN (talk) 16:39, 30 August 2019 (UTC)
Nomination of Nightbeat (Transformers) for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Nightbeat (Transformers) is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.
The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Nightbeat (Transformers) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.
Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article. TTN (talk) 17:55, 30 August 2019 (UTC)