User talk:Ilyasov941

August 2022

Please do not add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did to Barcode library. Wikipedia is not a collection of links, nor should it be used for advertising or promotion. Inappropriate links include, but are not limited to, links to personal websites, links to websites with which you are affiliated (whether as a link in article text, or a citation in an article), and links that attract visitors to a website or promote a product. See the external links guideline and spam guideline for further explanations. Because Wikipedia uses the nofollow attribute value, its external links are disregarded by most search engines. If you feel the link should be added to the page, please discuss it on the associated talk page rather than re-adding it. [1] Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 23:16, 3 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hi, thanks for your message, but could you explain then why Dynamsoft, Cognex, ByteScout set the links on their SDK solutions? Ilyasov941 (talk) 07:51, 5 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

There are many inappropriate links that have been missed on Wikipedia. A lot of people and companies try to abuse Wikipedia and use it for advertising. If you want to help, feel free to remove any and all inappropriate links, but the existence of them is not a reason to add more. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 11:48, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scanbot SDK (August 6)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Stuartyeates was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

These sources don't contain in depth coverage of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scanbot SDK and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Stuartyeates (talk) 05:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, Ilyasov941! Having an article draft declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! Stuartyeates (talk) 05:44, 6 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Scanbot SDK (August 9)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Jovanmilic97 was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

Meeting WP:NCORP is a very high bar, and this doesn't come close to it. A lot of passing mentions, WP:INTERVIEW and routine PR coverage for any company.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit after they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Scanbot SDK and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you do not edit your draft in the next 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Jovanmilic97 (talk) 17:07, 9 August 2022 (UTC)[reply]

December 2022

Please stop your disruptive editing. If you continue to add inappropriate external links to Wikipedia, as you did at Code 128, you may be blocked from editing. It is considered spamming and Wikipedia is not a vehicle for advertising or promotion. Because Wikipedia uses nofollow tags, additions of links to Wikipedia will not alter search engine rankings. Apparition¹¹ ^Complaints/Mistakes 11:45, 2 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Scanbot SDK

Hello, Ilyasov941. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Scanbot SDK, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 08:03, 7 March 2023 (UTC)[reply]