User talk:I AM WILDEDIT

Retired

This user is no longer active on Wikipedia.

this source is unreliable and i quit.

Welcome!

Hello, I AM WILDEDIT, and welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

The five pillars of Wikipedia
Contributing to Wikipedia
Tutorial
How to edit a page and How to develop articles
How to create your first article (using the Article Wizard if you wish)
Simplified Manual of Style
Wikipedia Teahouse (a user-friendly help forum)
The Wikipedia Adventure (a fun game-like tour to help get you oriented within Wikipedia)

I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! Please sign your messages on talk pages using four tildes (~~~~); this will automatically insert your username and the date. If you need help, check out Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or ask your question on this page and then place {{Help me}} before the question. Again, welcome! We're so glad you're here! Jim1138 (talk) 20:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of MPAA ratings info

Hello I AM WILDEDIT,

I wanted to let you know that I just tagged MPAA ratings info for deletion, because it appears to duplicate an existing Wikipedia article, Motion Picture Association of America film rating system.

If you feel that the article shouldn't be deleted, you can contest this deletion, but please don't remove the speedy deletion tag from the top.

You can leave a note on my talk page if you have questions. Blackguard 21:34, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, MPAA ratings Meaning

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, MPAA ratings Meaning. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Motion Picture Association of America film rating system. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Motion Picture Association of America film rating system – you might like to discuss new information at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Click here to contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be removed without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. GILO A&E⇑ 21:54, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

September 2014

Welcome to Wikipedia. It might not have been your intention, but you removed a speedy deletion tag from MPAA ratings info, a page you have created yourself. If you believe the page should not be deleted, you may contest the deletion by clicking on the button that says: Contest this speedy deletion and appears inside the speedy deletion notice. This will allow you to make your case on the article's talk page. Administrators will consider your reasoning before deciding what to do with the page. Thank you. Blackguard 22:10, 3 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please refrain from making unconstructive edits to Wikipedia, as you did at Smoking age. Your edits appear to be disruptive and have been reverted or removed.

If you are engaged in an article content dispute with another editor then please discuss the matter with the editor at their talk page, or the article's talk page. Alternatively you can read Wikipedia's dispute resolution page, and ask for independent help at one of the relevant notice boards.
If you are engaged in any other form of dispute that is not covered on the dispute resolution page, please seek assistance at Wikipedia's Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents.

Please ensure you are familiar with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines, and please do not continue to make edits that appear disruptive, until the dispute is resolved through consensus. Continuing to edit disruptively could result in loss of editing privileges. The information is correct, and it is already cited. Try looking at the references. Meters (talk) 20:57, 7 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Please stop adding unsourced content, as you did to Sia Furler. This contravenes Wikipedia's policy on verifiability. If you continue to do so, you may be blocked from editing Wikipedia. —MelbourneStar☆^talk 23:11, 17 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Wow I'm getting a warning? Just for once? Perhaps you should read the 3RR code:

"An editor must not vandalize a page more then 3 times for 24 hours (all day). I shouldn't be blocked for making vandalism 1 time, You should be blocked for edit warring and edit war why me? Your going to have to explain what i did wrong and a policy regarding wikipedia and don't report users who made a mistake the 1st time, User:I AM WILDEDIT 16:06 September 17, 2014 (UTC)

That warning is not for edit warring. It is for adding unsourced content. And if you are going to quote something, don't change the words. The WP:3RR policy says nothing about being allowed to vandalize a page 3 times in one day. WP:AGF only goes so far, and as far as I'm concerned, you've used up my assumption of good faith on your part. Meters (talk) 02:22, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

List of Call of Duty characters

I undid your edit to List of Call of Duty characters as it was not encyclopedic. Please see the welcome section above on how to edit and add sources. Thank you Jim1138 (talk) 20:40, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you disrupt Wikipedia, as you did at List of Call of Duty characters. Jim1138 (talk) 20:44, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

If you want to do it your way, please do it somewhere else. Thank you Jim1138 (talk)

Usually, page protection is only used if a block (i.e. locking you out from editing) is not sufficient. Read your page above, nobody said anything about edit warring. I said use proper format or don't do it. Jim1138 (talk) 20:54, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Fine ill stop :(.

September 2014 again

As I said above, you've exhausted my assumption of good faith. Since you have returned to Smoking age and once again made claims that contradict the cited sources (afer posting on my page that you would stop) here's your final warning for that also. Meters (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You may be blocked from editing without further warning the next time you add unsourced material to Wikipedia, as you did at Smoking age. Meters (talk) 21:13, 18 September 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Im sorry meters i will not do it again.

October 2014

Your recent edits to Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Djmex9205/Archive could give Wikipedia contributors the impression that you may consider legal or other "off-wiki" action against them, or against Wikipedia itself. Please note that making such threats on Wikipedia is strictly prohibited under Wikipedia's policies on legal threats and civility. Users who make such threats may be blocked. If you have a dispute with the content of any page on Wikipedia, please follow the proper channels for dispute resolution. Please be sure to comment on content, not contributors, and where possible make specific suggestions for changes supported by reliable independent sources and focusing especially on verifiable errors of fact. Thank you. Meters (talk) 21:13, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

There is currently a discussion at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Incidents regarding an issue with which you may have been involved. Thank you. — Preceding unsigned comment added by Meters (talk • contribs) 21:34, October 1, 2014‎

You currently appear to be engaged in an edit war according to the reverts you have made on Wikipedia:Sockpuppet investigations/Djmex9205/Archive. Users are expected to collaborate with others, to avoid editing disruptively, and to try to reach a consensus rather than repeatedly undoing other users' edits once it is known that there is a disagreement.

Please be particularly aware that Wikipedia's policy on edit warring states:

Edit warring is disruptive regardless of how many reverts you have made.
Do not edit war even if you believe you are right.

If you find yourself in an editing dispute, use the article's talk page to discuss controversial changes; work towards a version that represents consensus among editors. You can post a request for help at an appropriate noticeboard or seek dispute resolution. In some cases it may be appropriate to request temporary page protection. If you engage in an edit war, you may be blocked from editing. Dawn Bard (talk) 21:37, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Listen im 10 years old ok and i have wanted to be alone and therefore i cant believe you guys would not stop bothering me ok.

You have been blocked indefinitely from editing for making legal threats or taking legal action. Your ability to edit your talk page has also been revoked. If you think there are good reasons why you should be unblocked, you should read the guide to appealing blocks, then contact administrators by submitting a request to the Unblock Ticket Request System.

You are not allowed to edit Wikipedia while the threats stand or the legal action is unresolved. HJ Mitchell | Penny for your thoughts? 21:50, 1 October 2014 (UTC)[reply]