User talk:HumveeHardhat

Nomination of Harry Burr for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Harry Burr is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Burr until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chuka Chief_talk 17:36, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Nomination of Sustainable Transport Northamptonshire for deletion

A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Sustainable Transport Northamptonshire is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or whether it should be deleted.

The article will be discussed at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainable Transport Northamptonshire until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. The nomination will explain the policies and guidelines which are of concern. The discussion focuses on high-quality evidence and our policies and guidelines.

Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.

Chuka Chief_talk 17:39, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Proposed deletion of Sustainable Transport Holdings

The article Sustainable Transport Holdings has been proposed for deletion because of the following concern:

Non-profit org with mainly local coverage, lacks WP:ORG. See also Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Burr

While all constructive contributions to Wikipedia are appreciated, pages may be deleted for any of several reasons.

You may prevent the proposed deletion by removing the {{proposed deletion/dated}} notice, but please explain why in your edit summary or on the article's talk page.

Please consider improving the page to address the issues raised. Removing {{proposed deletion/dated}} will stop the proposed deletion process, but other deletion processes exist. In particular, the speedy deletion process can result in deletion without discussion, and articles for deletion allows discussion to reach consensus for deletion. CommanderWaterford (talk) 17:45, 31 January 2021 (UTC)[reply]

AfD

You can only "!vote" once. Keep, delete, comment, merge and draftify are the standard choices. After the first !vote and argument, if you want to add something, you are best to say 'Comment. Finally, be careful not to WP:BLUDGEON the discussion. Possibly (talk) 03:12, 1 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your contributed article, Daventry Parkway

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

Hello, I noticed that you recently created a new page, Daventry Parkway. First, thank you for your contribution; Wikipedia relies solely on the efforts of volunteers such as you. Unfortunately, the page you created covers a topic on which we already have a page – Weedon railway station. Because of the duplication, your article has been tagged for speedy deletion. Please note that this is not a comment on you personally and we hope you will continue helping to improve Wikipedia. If the topic of the article you created is one that interests you, then perhaps you would like to help out at Weedon railway station. If you have new information to add, you might want to discuss it at the article's talk page.

If you think the article you created should remain separate, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Additionally if you would like to have someone review articles you create before they go live so they are not nominated for deletion shortly after you post them, allow me to suggest the article creation process and using our search feature to find related information we already have in the encyclopedia. Try not to be discouraged. Wikipedia looks forward to your future contributions. Widefox; talk 19:11, 7 February 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Harry Burr

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Harry Burr requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Harry Burr. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:46, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Speedy deletion nomination of Sustainable Transport Northamptonshire

If this is the first article that you have created, you may want to read the guide to writing your first article.
You may want to consider using the Article Wizard to help you create articles.

A tag has been placed on Sustainable Transport Northamptonshire requesting that it be speedily deleted from Wikipedia. This has been done under section G4 of the criteria for speedy deletion, because the page appears to be a repost of material that was previously deleted following a deletion discussion, at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainable Transport Northamptonshire. When a page has substantially identical content to that of a page deleted after a discussion, and any changes in the content do not address the reasons for which the material was previously deleted, it may be deleted at any time.

If you think this page should not be deleted for this reason, you may contest the nomination by visiting the page and clicking the button labelled "Contest this speedy deletion". This will give you the opportunity to explain why you believe the page should not be deleted. However, be aware that once a page is tagged for speedy deletion, it may be deleted without delay. Please do not remove the speedy deletion tag from the page yourself, but do not hesitate to add information in line with Wikipedia's policies and guidelines. If the page is deleted, and you wish to retrieve the deleted material for future reference or improvement, then please contact the deleting administrator, or if you have already done so, you can place a request here. Spiderone^{(Talk to Spider)} 19:48, 15 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Hi HumveeHardhat, there is a very clear consensus in that discussion to delete it. I am happy to return it to the drafting area, where you can work on adding these new reliable sources that demonstrate notability, then ask for it to be reviewed by the Articles for Creation process to ensure that it is ready to go. Is this OK with you? Cheers, Daniel (talk) 03:39, 14 March 2021 (UTC)"[reply]

HumveeHardhat, note the bolding in the comment above, which I copied from my talk page. Why did you not do this? Given you did not do it, I fully support the re-deletion of the article per G4 (recreation of deleted article). Pinging deleting administrator Discospinster. Cheers, Daniel (talk) 23:46, 16 March 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Hi Daniel, I thought that was what you meant. How was I meant to go about requesting to be re-published?

UK Health Security Agency logo

Hey - just wanted to drop you a note to explain. You uploaded File:UKHSA Logo from GOV.UK.png to Wikimedia Commons, but these logos are covered by copyright, so they have to be uploaded to Wikipedia instead. I have uploaded a version to Wikipedia at File:Logo of the UK Health Security Agency.png and swapped it out in the UK Health Security Agency article, and nominated the one you uploaded at Commons for deletion. I also noticed the version you uploaded had the text italicised - not sure why this was! ninety:one (reply on my talk) 17:31, 19 May 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Weedon Station Project

Hello, HumveeHardhat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Weedon Station Project, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Draft space is not an indefinite storage location for content that is not appropriate for article space.

If your submission is not edited soon, it could be nominated for deletion under CSD G13. If you would like to attempt to save it, you will need to improve it. You may request userfication of the content if it meets requirements.

If the deletion has already occured, instructions on how you may be able to retrieve it are available here.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 01:02, 17 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Sustainable Transport Midlands (June 20)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Bonadea was:

This submission's references do not show that the subject qualifies for a Wikipedia article—that is, they do not show significant coverage (not just passing mentions) about the subject in published, reliable, secondary sources that are independent of the subject (see the guidelines on the notability of organizations and companies). Before any resubmission, additional references meeting these criteria should be added (see technical help and learn about mistakes to avoid when addressing this issue). If no additional references exist, the subject is not suitable for Wikipedia.

The comment the reviewer left was:

* This is the same organisation that was discussed in Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Sustainable Transport Northamptonshire, which ended in a decision to delete that article four months ago. This article does not clearly show that the organisation has become significantly more notable since then.

There are a lot of intricate details about different names, re-brandings, parent companies etc, which give a surface impression of importance, but there are no secondary or independent sources for any of that information. If nobody except themselves have written about their different organisational structure, then those details are not encyclopedic, and the entire "History" section could be summarised in a sentence or two.

There are 14 references to self-published sources, the organisation's own websites and wiki. The stn.miraheze.org references can't be used at all, and transport-mids.com can only be used very sparingly. The Companies House source and the assets.publishing.service.gov.uk source are independent, but they are primary sources which also don't show notability.

The "Publicity" section does not add anything of relevance. "Throughout it's time, Sustainable Transport Midlands has received a lot of publicity, including in radio shows, magazines, and online media and newspapers." is just promotion, and that the organisation's own website lists its mentions in media is not something an encyclopedia is interested in. The links listed in the section could potentially be used as sources in the article (well, not the Rail Technology Magazine one which doesn't seem to mention any of the "Sustainable Transport" organisations).

It is unclear what the "Lutterworth Line" section is, in relation to the rest of the article. Either it is a project run by Sustainable Transport Midlands, in which case it belongs in the article, or else it isn't, in which case it doesn't. Since the draft includes references and external links that talk about the previous incarnation of the organisation, it does not quite make sense to describe them as different entities.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Sustainable Transport Midlands and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you now believe the draft cannot meet Wikipedia's standards or do not wish to progress it further, you may request deletion. Please go to Draft:Sustainable Transport Midlands, click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window, add "{{Db-g7}}" at the top of the draft text and click the blue "publish changes" button to save this edit.
If you do not make any further changes to your draft, in 6 months, it will be considered abandoned and may be deleted.
If you need any assistance, or have experienced any untoward behavior associated with this submission, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk, on the reviewer's talk page or use Wikipedia's real-time chat help from experienced editors.

bonadea contributions talk 11:07, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Hello, HumveeHardhat! Having an article declined at Articles for Creation can be disappointing. If you are wondering why your article submission was declined, please post a question at the Articles for creation help desk. If you have any other questions about your editing experience, we'd love to help you at the Teahouse, a friendly space on Wikipedia where experienced editors lend a hand to help new editors like yourself! See you there! bonadea contributions talk 11:07, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Managing a conflict of interest

Hello, HumveeHardhat. We welcome your contributions, but if you have an external relationship with the people, places or things you have written about on Wikipedia, you may have a conflict of interest (COI). Editors with a conflict of interest may be unduly influenced by their connection to the topic. See the conflict of interest guideline and FAQ for organizations for more information. We ask that you:

avoid editing or creating articles about yourself, your family, friends, colleagues, company, organization or competitors;
propose changes on the talk pages of affected articles (you can use the {{request edit}} template);
disclose your conflict of interest when discussing affected articles (see Wikipedia:Conflict of interest#How to disclose a COI);
avoid linking to your organization's website in other articles (see WP:Spam);
do your best to comply with Wikipedia's content policies.

In addition, you are required by the Wikimedia Foundation's terms of use to disclose your employer, client, and affiliation with respect to any contribution which forms all or part of work for which you receive, or expect to receive, compensation. See Wikipedia:Paid-contribution disclosure.

Also, editing for the purpose of advertising, publicising, or promoting anyone or anything is not permitted. It looks like you have never received any substantial information about how to handle your conflict of interest, so please take a minute to read through the information here. The additions of information about Burr, the Sustainable Transport organisations, and their campaigns to a number of tangentially related articles are not constructive since the Wikipedia community has concluded that Burr and Sustainable Transport Northamptonshire are not notable. These additions come across as promotional rather than informational. bonadea contributions talk 12:26, 20 June 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Weedon Station Project

Hello, HumveeHardhat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Weedon Station Project".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. If you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 00:41, 15 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

"Daventry Parkway Project" listed at Redirects for discussion

A discussion is taking place to address the redirect Daventry Parkway Project. The discussion will occur at Wikipedia:Redirects for discussion/Log/2021 July 15#Daventry Parkway Project until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. --John Maynard Friedman (talk) 14:02, 16 July 2021 (UTC)[reply]

Orphaned non-free image File:Proposed North Yorkshire Council logo.png

⚠

Thanks for uploading File:Proposed North Yorkshire Council logo.png. The image description page currently specifies that the image is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, the image is currently not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the image was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that images for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).

Note that any non-free images not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described in section F5 of the criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. --B-bot (talk) 17:30, 16 June 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Concern regarding Draft:Sustainable Transport Midlands

Hello, HumveeHardhat. This is a bot-delivered message letting you know that Draft:Sustainable Transport Midlands, a page you created, has not been edited in at least 5 months. Drafts that have not been edited for six months may be deleted, so if you wish to retain the page, please edit it again or request that it be moved to your userspace.

If the page has already been deleted, you can request it be undeleted so you can continue working on it.

Thank you for your submission to Wikipedia. FireflyBot (talk) 00:01, 20 December 2022 (UTC)[reply]

Your draft article, Draft:Sustainable Transport Midlands

Hello, HumveeHardhat. It has been over six months since you last edited the Articles for Creation submission or Draft page you started, "Sustainable Transport Midlands".

In accordance with our policy that Wikipedia is not for the indefinite hosting of material deemed unsuitable for the encyclopedia mainspace, the draft has been deleted. When you plan on working on it further and you wish to retrieve it, you can request its undeletion. An administrator will, in most cases, restore the submission so you can continue to work on it.

Thanks for your submission to Wikipedia, and happy editing. Liz ^{Read! Talk!} 23:35, 19 January 2023 (UTC)[reply]