User talk:GreyCat
Welcome!
Hello GreyCat, and welcome to Wikipedia. Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Here are a few good links for newcomers:
- The Five Pillars of Wikipedia
- How to edit a page
- Editing, policy, conduct, and structure tutorial
- Picture tutorial
- How to write a great article
- Naming conventions
- Manual of Style
- Merging, redirecting, and renaming pages
- If you're ready for the complete list of Wikipedia documentation, there's also Wikipedia:Topical index.
I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! By the way, please be sure to sign your name on Talk and vote pages using four tildes (~~~~) to produce your name and the current date, or three tildes (~~~) for just your name. If you have any questions, see the help pages, add a question to the village pump or ask me on my Talk page. Again, welcome!
Thanks for adding the IPA notice to Flapping and General American, but according to Template talk:IPA notice it's not really considered necessary anymore. --Angr/tɔk tə mi 10:48, 26 July 2005 (UTC)
Effects units merge
[edit]How is it going with the merge, in december(!) you said youd go ahead with it, yet its not in your TODO list... Martijn Hoekstra 18:54, 11 April 2006 (UTC)
- Oops. I guess I just forgot about it already... I'll put it in TODO soon and would try to start things rolling soon... GreyCat 06:03, 13 April 2006 (UTC)
hey GreyCat
[edit]I've noticed your username at Guitar and I've checked your contribs a little bit... I think we can help each other to improve Guitar, what do you think? +MATIA ☎ 13:06, 9 December 2005 (UTC)
fretless
[edit]as you can read in [1], until 1976 when Erkan Ogur did it, classical guitar (spanish guitar let's say) wasn't modified to be fretless. Many mainly acoustic and base guitars, also electro guitars, were unfretted by that time for sure. But not the classical guitar, until 1976. You can see that in the above link although it is not specifically defined there which is the type of guitar Erkan Ogur modified. But until we reach a consensus, I have deleted those entries you pointed as not peoperly argued.
String gauges
[edit]Your table of gauges in the Strings (music) article is missing a bunch of values. Could you fill these in? I don't have access to this information.
By the way, where did you get this information? Just curious.
One more question: you say that string gauges are "traditionally" measured in thousandths of an inch. I know this is true here (the U.S.), but is it also true in the UK and other British-speaking places? --ILike2BeAnonymous 01:25, 29 January 2006 (UTC)
Sorry about that. I'd been meaning to put in a 'Disadvantages' column, but it seems to have slipped my mind. I restored the original column and added the new one; you might want to take a look. Cheers! Deltabeignet 22:03, 7 February 2006 (UTC)
'Suicides 'Category
[edit]Hello,
- I noticed that you deleted the general Category of 'Suicides' from the Peyo Yavorov Article.
- If a researcher is collecting data on 'suicide', it is my understanding that the general Category of 'Suicides' is there if they want a list of all persons who have committed suicide. The subcategories by occupation are for those researchers who want only persons of that occupation who committed suicide.
Regards,
Michael David 00:15, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
- Thank you. I do understand how a large, general category such as 'Suicides' could become unmanageable (it would be somewhat like having the Category, 'People'). I'm still learning some of the basic mechanics of Wikipedia, and I got a tip from another Community Member: to access the 'List of Suicides' option. I will add the Main Category 'Suicides' only when the specific person does not fit into an existing occuptional subcategory.
- Be healthy,
I've gotten input from some others on the Suicides Talk Page. Take a look if you already haven't. I would like to add 'Drug-related suicides' as a Subcategory of 'Suicides'. Perhaps we can start to make the 'Suicides' Category more manageable, accessible and user friendly. I look forward to working with you on this.
Be healthy,
Firearm suicides
[edit]Hello,
- I like to idea of a subcategory 'Firearm suicides'. Another area to consider is 'Drug-related deaths'. Perhaps this could be divided into 'Drug-related suicides' and 'Accidental Drug-related deaths'.
- I have to be careful here. I could easily become obsessed with creating lists and categories. After all, if you have glanced at my User Page, my work is in psychotherapy; which is, after all, trying to bring order to chaos.
- Be healthy,
Yukata Taniyama
[edit]I reverted your edit in Yukata Taniyama because he is not a scientist - he is not a mathematician. I don't think you could make an argument relating his work to science because his work was in a branch in number theory with no application in cryptography or computer science. Mathematics has applications in science but it is not a science - any mathematician will emphatically make that distinction. Anyway, just an explanation. DrIdiot 22:09, 30 March 2006 (UTC)
That's cool, I didn't know that. Anyway, thanks. DrIdiot 19:48, 1 April 2006 (UTC)
Sound synthesis types
[edit]Hi!
I think you added the {Sound synthesis types} category to Phase distortion synthesis, right?
Thats just fine :)
What I wonder is, where is the definition of that category? It includes synthesis types that do not have corresponding articles, no commercial implementations and hardly even a mention on the entire interweb ...
I would like to "fix" that, but unfortunately my searching abilities only leads to other articles including the category/template ... Do You have any ideas where to look?
(Ahrgh ... Never mind! I found it.)
Ibanez Universe photo
[edit]Hey there, I'm creating an article about Ibanez JEM right now. My question is, where did you get a permission to upload the image, as I really want to upload the image of the JEM. Thanks - Imoeng 11:10, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
- In fact, there's already an uploaded image of JEM in wikipedia: Image:JEM7VWH.jpg. As infoboxes around this pictures cite, these are taken without explicit permission from product promotional images published on Ibanez's site. In absence of free alternative, it's better than nothing, though you can't put this stuff in wiki commons :( --GreyCat 11:21, 28 July 2006 (UTC)
WikiProject
[edit]Hey again, thanks for fixing the Ibanez JEM article.. So I see you like music and guitar as well as I do. Why don't we get together and make a WikiProject for guitars and other instuments? If you have time, please see [this] and tell me what you think. Thanks -- Imoeng 11:19, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- It's already Portal:Guitar and Wikipedia:WikiProject Guitarists and even some kind of empty page Wikipedia:WikiProject Guitar out there, but it's all kind of stagnant, with no real plans, clear targets, progress, etc. I'm digging on and taking care of most Category:Guitar articles since my coming to Wikipedia, but, sadly, it's a huge amount of work and barely anything can organize things well. May be we could establish a clear plan in Portal:Guitar and gather more than 2 of us there, so that the thing won't come to be another ambitious, but stagnant project? --GreyCat 12:50, 30 July 2006 (UTC)
- Its just a plan for the project, its not a WikiProject yet, that is why it is so simple, as Wikipedia has suggested. You are in WikiProject Guitarist aren't you? Aguerriero has said we can combine the guitar specifications project and the guitarist project, (see the talk page). Imoeng 01:29, 3 August 2006 (UTC)
Sample uuencode table license
[edit]Hi there. I noticed this beautifully illustrative table you added to the uuencode article:
Original characters | C
|
a
|
t
| |||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Original ASCII, decimal | 67 | 97 | 116 | |||||||||||||||||||||
ASCII, binary | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 |
New decimal values | 16 | 54 | 5 | 52 | ||||||||||||||||||||
+32 | 48 | 86 | 37 | 84 | ||||||||||||||||||||
Uuencoded characters | 0
|
V
|
%
|
T
|
This evidently involved a fair amount of effort. I have a page on another wiki which discusses an implementation of uuencode which this table would be very useful in illustrating, but the license on this wiki does not permit GFDL material. Could I persuade you to release your table under either the MIT license or public domain, and to similarly release your license statement for posting there? Thanks. Deco 02:51, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- Sure, no problem. Shall I write something somewhere or just writing here that this table is explicitly released in public domain will do? --GreyCat 06:43, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
- That's good, thanks a lot. :-) Deco 06:44, 7 September 2006 (UTC)
Articles you might like to edit, from SuggestBot
[edit]SuggestBot predicts that you will enjoy editing some of these articles. Have fun!
|
SuggestBot picks articles in a number of ways based on other articles you've edited, including straight text similarity, following wikilinks, and matching your editing patterns against those of other Wikipedians. It tries to recommend only articles that other Wikipedians have marked as needing work. Your contributions make Wikipedia better -- thanks for helping.
If you have feedback on how to make SuggestBot better, please tell me on SuggestBot's talk page. Thanks from ForteTuba, SuggestBot's caretaker.
P.S. You received these suggestions because your name was listed on the SuggestBot request page. If this was in error, sorry about the confusion. -- SuggestBot 12:39, 11 September 2006 (UTC)
#!/bin/cat Shebang Quine "Illegal?"
[edit]FYI - There's some discussion on the Talk for Shebang (Unix) on the comment (apparently yours) that a quine is "illegal". The posters "didn't know how to get your attention" on this. Any comments to help out the confusion? (Please reply at Talk for Shebang (Unix), not my personal UserTalk. Thanks.) -- Writtenonsand 15:07, 3 October 2006 (UTC)
- I believe that it was User:Jleedev who added that line: http://en.wiki.x.io/w/index.php?title=Shebang_%28Unix%29&diff=61690762&oldid=61170953 --GreyCat 11:04, 4 October 2006 (UTC)
wikEd
[edit]Hi, I have seen that you are using the Cacycle editor extension. This program is no longer actively maintained in favor of its much more powerful successor wikEd.
wikEd has all the functionality of the old editor plus:• syntax highlighting • nifty image buttons • morefixing buttons • paste formatted text from Word or web pages• convert the formatted text into wikicode • adjustthe font size • and much, much more.
Switching to wikEd is easy, check the detailed installation description on its project homepage. Usually it is as simple as changing every occurrence of editor.js into wikEd.js on your User:YourUsername/monobook.js page.
Cacycle 21:33, 8 November 2006 (UTC)
For my rationale, see WP:OR, Wikipedia:Verifiability, and WP:NOT. Does it really matter, in the grand scheme of article creation, that pick choice is personal preference? Deltabeignet 00:13, 5 December 2006 (UTC)
Hello, with regard to your last edit at Talk:Prepared guitar, are u maybe suggesting that we have to investigate some conflict of interest issues? see WP:COI. Cheers. :) --Dr. Who 22:31, 16 February 2007 (UTC)
- Yes, maybe, but I don't think we should rush and delete it all at once. It has a potentially is useful, but not in that many articles. --GreyCat 07:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, despite likely WP:COI issues, the articles seem fair enough to me, and the involved editors are not engaging any bad behaviour. :) I agree with the merge. Dr. Who 10:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Please add a vote for merge on Talk:Prepared guitar? --GreyCat 10:44, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Ok. Furthermore, if you think that this discussion has to be moved at that article's talk page, feel free to do so.--Dr. Who 10:50, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- Hey, I reworked and wikified a bit that talk page.Dr. Who 12:49, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
- I agree, despite likely WP:COI issues, the articles seem fair enough to me, and the involved editors are not engaging any bad behaviour. :) I agree with the merge. Dr. Who 10:30, 17 February 2007 (UTC)
Loudspeaker peer review request
[edit]I've requested the article Loudspeaker to have peer review. I noticed it was pretty good and might deserve a GA status. If you can take a look at it too and help evaluate and improve it's quality, that would be great. The peer review tag can be found on the article's talk page. --Davidkazuhiro 10:26, 19 February 2007 (UTC)
I've requested a rename on the SQL Statements category. It seems to have expanded to include other SQL keywords which are not SQL Statements per the ISO/IEC 9075-n:2003 standards. Several of the keywords represented are SQL clauses (ORDER BY, WHERE, etc.) and other non-statement keywords like NULL. I expect the list will eventually be expanded to include SQL expressions like CASE and possibly SQL standard functions like AVG, SUM, and COALESCE. I propose changing the name to SQL Keywords to more accurately reflect the content of the category. The entry on the discussion page is at Categories for discussion:SQL statements. Thanks. SqlPac 03:05, 26 April 2007 (UTC)
GreyCat, thank you...
[edit]For helping out with the single coil pickup article. I like the new images too. It is much a appreciated.
WikiProject Synthesizer
[edit]Hi. You expressed interest in the Synthesizer WikiProject in the past. I've created a project page for this project. You're welcome to come by and join if you are still interested. --Mperry 18:28, 14 July 2007 (UTC)
Sound Synthesis Theory
[edit]A new wikibook at [[2]] has been started. It may interest you to edit / help out! —Preceding unsigned comment added by 86.153.219.246 (talk) 21:05, August 27, 2007 (UTC)
Spaces in headers
[edit]Thanks for the note. Really doesn't matter much either way. Rich Farmbrough, 21:24 15 September 2007 (GMT).
- Even within an article. Rich Farmbrough, 21:35 15 September 2007 (GMT).
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Ibanez UV777P BK.jpg)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Ibanez UV777P BK.jpg. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BetacommandBot 22:50, 11 October 2007 (UTC)
Replaceable fair use Image:Roland_GK-3.jpg
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Roland_GK-3.jpg. I noticed the description page specifies that the media is being used under fair use, but its use in Wikipedia articles fails our first fair use criterion in that it illustrates a subject for which a freely licensed media could reasonably be found or created that provides substantially the same information. If you believe this media is not replaceable, please:
- Go to the media description page and edit it to add
{{di-replaceable fair use disputed}}
, without deleting the original Replaceable fair use template. - On the image discussion page, write the reason why this image is not replaceable at all.
Alternatively, you can also choose to replace the fair use media by finding freely licensed media of the same subject, requesting that the copyright holder release this (or similar) media under a free license, or by taking a picture of it yourself.
If you have uploaded other fair use media, consider checking that you have specified how these images fully satisfy our fair use criteria. You can find a list of description pages you have edited by clicking on this link. Note that even if you follow steps 1 and 2 above, fair use media which could be replaced by free-licensed alternatives will be deleted 2 days after this notification (7 days if not used in an article), per our Fair Use policy. If you have any questions please ask them at the Media copyright questions page. Thank you. – Quadell (talk) (random) 14:53, 14 December 2007 (UTC)
EF lens charts
[edit]Hi, I thought you might be interested in this discussion. thegreen J Are you green? 21:50, 1 January 2008 (UTC)
Hi Alan! I left a rationale for the deletion on the page. I am routinely removing external links, so I do not leave a long rationale for each. Please see the discussion there. Just adding inline references should do the trick.--Legionarius (talk) 18:18, 4 January 2008 (UTC)
Re: Bjorn Turoque
[edit]Sounds good! I didn't look to see if it had previously been its own article. I moved it to its own page when I saw it was in WP:RA. Kevinebaugh (talk) 17:38, 6 January 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Agworldchamps.gif)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Agworldchamps.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 04:23, 8 March 2008 (UTC)
Measuring pick thickness with calipers
[edit]Man, don't just revert, try and talk about things first...
I had put an entry on Guitar Pick talk page a week ago, but you seem to have overlooked it. Your picture is nice to illustrade the way calipers work, but the do not serve any real function regarding picks. Do you want to show that a 2mm pick is exactly 2mm thick? What a surprise! Seriously, the picture does not help the article. Also, it is far from perfect in that it shows someone measuring that pick just somewhere and not at its thickest point. What's the deal with that? Iago4096 14:12, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Re: Free software hardware testing platform
[edit]Never heard of it. Don't know anything about it. Feel free to create an article about if, if you feel it is notable. -- Frap (talk) 23:19, 29 June 2008 (UTC)
Orphaned non-free media (Image:Irond logo.gif)
[edit]Thanks for uploading Image:Irond logo.gif. The media description page currently specifies that it is non-free and may only be used on Wikipedia under a claim of fair use. However, it is currently orphaned, meaning that it is not used in any articles on Wikipedia. If the media was previously in an article, please go to the article and see why it was removed. You may add it back if you think that that will be useful. However, please note that media for which a replacement could be created are not acceptable for use on Wikipedia (see our policy for non-free media).
If you have uploaded other unlicensed media, please check whether they're used in any articles or not. You can find a list of 'image' pages you have edited by clicking on the "my contributions" link (it is located at the very top of any Wikipedia page when you are logged in), and then selecting "Image" from the dropdown box. Note that all non-free media not used in any articles will be deleted after seven days, as described on criteria for speedy deletion. Thank you. BJBot (talk) 05:08, 5 July 2008 (UTC)
You seem to have a history of similar redundant or copyright violation images. Do cease this harmful activity. —Preceding unsigned comment added by 59.93.241.207 (talk) 01:13, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Blog Links
[edit]I do know about the "no follow." I posted those links as references. If you feel that they should be removed, remove them all - doesn't bother me.sarindam7 (talk) 23:52, 23 November 2008 (UTC)
I do know about the "NOW FOLLOW." I added those links to a few articles that had no citations. I know quite a lot about this subject and the links that I posted were "reference material - better than nothing." If you believe it violates some rule, go ahead ad remove them all. I've seen dozens of "free tutorial" links all over here and they're still there and that was why I posted it, not for the search engines. Presumptions are not good. Do me a favor, remove them all for me will you?sarindam7 (talk) 00:02, 24 November 2008 (UTC)
Deletion of Djay (software)
[edit]Hi, I noticed your proposal to delete Djay (software). I am one of the contributors to the article, and while I agree that the article is not well-written, I still think of the software as notable and I wanted to see if you had any comments on how to establish its notability. I first read about the software in this Digg front-page article and I have since seen a number of reviews, e.g. by Macworld, MacUser, Skratchworx and iDJ Magazine. I read the Wikipedia articles on notability, but I'm still not quite sure on how to go about establishing notability. Although I don't have much experience in writing articles, I will also try to rephrase the article to be less of an advertisement. Thanks for your help! -- TripleF (talk) 03:18, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
OK I have rewritten the article to address some of the deletion arguments. -- TripleF (talk) 05:10, 10 December 2008 (UTC)
FuturixImager
[edit]You didn't do the AFD process properly; since this already had an AFD, you have to add (2nd nomination). All you did was relist an AFD from 2007. I'll fix this for you. Ten Pound Hammer, his otters and a clue-bat • (Many otters • One bat • One hammer) 12:27, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
- Thanks! I couldn't find any info on how to do it properly. Is it documented somewhere? --GreyCat (talk) 12:53, 22 August 2009 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Samplers
[edit]Category:Samplers, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:47, 4 August 2011 (UTC)
Categories for discussion nomination of Category:Guitar-related websites
[edit]Category:Guitar-related websites, which you created, has been nominated for discussion. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. Mike Selinker (talk) 16:51, 19 January 2012 (UTC)
SUL request confirmation
[edit]Confirmation of SUL request to Lithuanian Wikipedia --GreyCat (talk) 05:50, 29 July 2013 (UTC)
October 2013
[edit]Hello, I'm BracketBot. I have automatically detected that your edit to Archery at the 1980 Summer Olympics may have broken the syntax by modifying 2 "[]"s. If you have, don't worry: just edit the page again to fix it. If I misunderstood what happened, or if you have any questions, you can leave a message on my operator's talk page.
- List of unpaired brackets remaining on the page:
- Poikolainen (Finland), Giancarlo Ferrari (Italy) on the victory podium.jpg|thumb|Men's medalists]]]]
Thanks, BracketBot (talk) 09:23, 14 October 2013 (UTC)
Template:Infobox record label has been nominated for deletion. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. eh bien mon prince (talk) 12:41, 13 April 2014 (UTC)
Category:Former Metal Blade Records artists
[edit]Category:Former Metal Blade Records artists, which you created, has been nominated for possible deletion, merging, or renaming. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the Categories for discussion page. Thank you. —Justin (koavf)❤T☮C☺M☯ 05:06, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 13:00, 23 November 2015 (UTC)
Question about re-using a file
[edit]Hello, GreyCat. I have made a modified version of commons:File:Fretboard inlays.svg that shows the coverage of various partial capos. Since you likely know much more about Commons than I do, how would I go about uploading it? Eman235/talk 00:22, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Basically, it's straightforward: you go to commons:Special:UploadWizard and follow the steps proposed there. When asked for licensing, you reference the original file like you did here and describe it as a derivative work. Feel free to contact me if you'll need any help or encounter any obstacles. --GreyCat (talk) 06:28, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Well, here it is -- tell me what you think, and if I've done anything wrong. Eman235/talk 13:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Looks good to me :) Three fairly minor notes:
- please specify yourself in "Author: " fields — as it's your creation, not mine;
- please drop in a link to original file (i.e. commons:File:Fretboard inlays.svg) somewhere, for example, in the description, something like "(based on File:Fretboard inlays.svg)"
- maybe you could opt to use more contrast — probably white capos on dark brown fretboard would look better than black capos on dark brown. --GreyCat (talk) 13:48, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- Did the first two. I was already thinking of altering the file, since the text looks a bit small (see here for an example). I'll get to it soon. Eman235/talk 13:54, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
- I've took a closer look at the topic and I might a few other suggestions. I don't see much point in using fretboard inlays scheme file here, as fretboard inlays file illustrates absolute positions which are important for determining locations on fretboard, but for illustrating partial capos you don't really need neither absolute nor relative positions on the fretboard. Basically, the only thing you need is a diagram of one individual fret, not the whole fretboard — that's extra information and it might be confusing (for example, an ignorant beginner might think that "Woody's G-Band" can be only applied on frets 1 and 2, "Woody's G-Band Mk II" can be used on frets 3 and 4, etc). Given that you need just 1 fret for illustration, you don't have to arrange them all vertically, you can arrange them in 2 or 3 columns for readability, or it might look even better in individual files, represented in <gallery>...</gallery> wiki formatting. That automatically might some text readability problem too. --GreyCat (talk) 09:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Good point. The "capos up the neck" diagram really doesn't make all that much sense when I think about it, considering the six-string capo covering everything else at the twelfth fret. I will be back, with new, improved capo diagrams. Eman235/talk 13:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Given that it's a diagram, I'd rather stick to standard chord-like diagrams like — just make sure that they're in SVG. I've took a chance to browse through all the guitar chord diagrams in commons::Category:Guitar chords — it's such a mess :( I'm almost feeling tempted to write a quick script that will generate pure chord SVG images by request... Do you think that would be a good idea — something simple like a single HTML + JavaScript page that will generate chord images? --GreyCat (talk) 16:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- That would be great, though I'm not sure what sort of "page" you're talking about. Eman235/talk 16:28, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Given that it's a diagram, I'd rather stick to standard chord-like diagrams like — just make sure that they're in SVG. I've took a chance to browse through all the guitar chord diagrams in commons::Category:Guitar chords — it's such a mess :( I'm almost feeling tempted to write a quick script that will generate pure chord SVG images by request... Do you think that would be a good idea — something simple like a single HTML + JavaScript page that will generate chord images? --GreyCat (talk) 16:20, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Good point. The "capos up the neck" diagram really doesn't make all that much sense when I think about it, considering the six-string capo covering everything else at the twelfth fret. I will be back, with new, improved capo diagrams. Eman235/talk 13:49, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- I've took a closer look at the topic and I might a few other suggestions. I don't see much point in using fretboard inlays scheme file here, as fretboard inlays file illustrates absolute positions which are important for determining locations on fretboard, but for illustrating partial capos you don't really need neither absolute nor relative positions on the fretboard. Basically, the only thing you need is a diagram of one individual fret, not the whole fretboard — that's extra information and it might be confusing (for example, an ignorant beginner might think that "Woody's G-Band" can be only applied on frets 1 and 2, "Woody's G-Band Mk II" can be used on frets 3 and 4, etc). Given that you need just 1 fret for illustration, you don't have to arrange them all vertically, you can arrange them in 2 or 3 columns for readability, or it might look even better in individual files, represented in <gallery>...</gallery> wiki formatting. That automatically might some text readability problem too. --GreyCat (talk) 09:00, 16 December 2015 (UTC)
- Looks good to me :) Three fairly minor notes:
- Well, here it is -- tell me what you think, and if I've done anything wrong. Eman235/talk 13:26, 15 December 2015 (UTC)
ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!
[edit]Hello, GreyCat. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)
ArbCom 2017 election voter message
[edit]Hello, GreyCat. Voting in the 2017 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 10 December. All users who registered an account before Saturday, 28 October 2017, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Wednesday, 1 November 2017 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2017 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 3 December 2017 (UTC)
ArbCom 2018 election voter message
[edit]Hello, GreyCat. Voting in the 2018 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23.59 on Sunday, 3 December. All users who registered an account before Sunday, 28 October 2018, made at least 150 mainspace edits before Thursday, 1 November 2018 and are not currently blocked are eligible to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2018 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 18:42, 19 November 2018 (UTC)
Nomination for merging of Template:Infobox record label
[edit]Template:Infobox record label has been nominated for merging with Template:Infobox brand. You are invited to comment on the discussion at the template's entry on the Templates for discussion page. Thank you. PPEMES (talk) 21:31, 24 March 2020 (UTC)
Category:Seppuku has been nominated for renaming
[edit]Category:Seppuku has been nominated for renaming. A discussion is taking place to decide whether this proposal complies with the categorization guidelines. If you would like to participate in the discussion, you are invited to add your comments at the category's entry on the categories for discussion page. Thank you. Clarityfiend (talk) 05:37, 22 January 2021 (UTC)
Nomination of Les Trophées du Libre for deletion
[edit]A discussion is taking place as to whether the article Les Trophées du Libre, to which you have significantly contributed, is suitable for inclusion in Wikipedia according to Wikipedia's policies and guidelines or if it should be deleted.
The discussion will take place at Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/Les Trophées du Libre (2nd nomination) until a consensus is reached, and anyone, including you, is welcome to contribute to the discussion. Users may edit the article during the discussion, including to improve the article to address concerns raised in the discussion. However, do not remove the article-for-deletion notice from the top of the article.
To customise your preferences for automated AfD notifications for articles to which you've significantly contributed (or to opt-out entirely), please visit the configuration page. Delivered by SDZeroBot (talk) 01:03, 28 June 2021 (UTC)
Wikimedia Sound Logo project
[edit]Wikimedia Sound Logo project | |
---|---|
Hello, the Wikimedia sound logo project is in an early development phase -- this stage is for asking all kinds of questions, developing and fielding ideas, finding themes and shaping the direction of the project. Here is a link to the meta page for the project: http://meta.wikimedia.org/wiki/Communications/Sound_Logo Your input is welcome. Thank you. |