User talk:Gil mo
- Hello Gil mo! I've noticed the speedy delete tag and I've deleted it myself; I've also added some information. Please feel free to come back and help me improve this article! --Vlad|-> 16:45, 24 October 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome! I supposed you're an IA user, just like myself, right? --Vlad|-> 08:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- Very interesting approach: you're a very unsatisfied IA user, but yet you've chosen to create an wiki article about the product. I've been a long time IA user, of course, unsatisfied from time to time, especially about the time they took to fix bugs and implement feature requests. But we choose to pay the maintance, therefore upgrades are free. Haven't we already met on the community forum? --Vlad|-> 12:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- I see. I would like to ask you something: as I'm not a native English speaker, I'm afraid I failed to grasp the meaning of the last sentence of your last message to me... Would you mind rephrasing or explaining it to me? Thanks! --Vlad|-> 12:10, 28 October 2007 (UTC)
- Very interesting approach: you're a very unsatisfied IA user, but yet you've chosen to create an wiki article about the product. I've been a long time IA user, of course, unsatisfied from time to time, especially about the time they took to fix bugs and implement feature requests. But we choose to pay the maintance, therefore upgrades are free. Haven't we already met on the community forum? --Vlad|-> 12:47, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
- You're welcome! I supposed you're an IA user, just like myself, right? --Vlad|-> 08:48, 25 October 2007 (UTC)
Blood glucose
[edit]The lab results are typically thought to be more accurate. However, there could be other factors, like taking the lab tests at a different point in the day, after you've eaten, which would dramatically affect your blood glucose level. StuRat (talk) 05:17, 18 November 2013 (UTC)
ArbCom 2020 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2021 Elections voter message
[edit]ArbCom 2022 Elections voter message
[edit]Hello! Voting in the 2022 Arbitration Committee elections is now open until 23:59 (UTC) on Monday, 12 December 2022. All eligible users are allowed to vote. Users with alternate accounts may only vote once.
The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.
If you wish to participate in the 2022 election, please review the candidates and submit your choices on the voting page. If you no longer wish to receive these messages, you may add {{NoACEMM}}
to your user talk page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 00:22, 29 November 2022 (UTC)
WP:ARBPIA4 general sanctions on List of terrorist incidents in 2023
[edit]Hi,
This edit reverting me constitutes a second revert performed by you on that article within 24 and thus you have breached the 1RR editing restrictions that apply within WP:ARBPIA4 topic areas. There was a notice regarding this, at the top of the page, when you selected edit. Please self-revert immediately. TarnishedPathtalk 23:02, 22 November 2023 (UTC)
Notice of edit warring noticeboard discussion
[edit]
Hello. This message is being sent to inform you that there is currently a discussion involving you at Wikipedia:Administrators' noticeboard/Edit warring regarding a possible violation of Wikipedia's policy on edit warring. Thank you. TarnishedPathtalk 07:55, 23 November 2023 (UTC)
Introduction to contentious topics
[edit]You have recently edited a page related to the Arab–Israeli conflict, a topic designated as contentious. This is a brief introduction to contentious topics and does not imply that there are any issues with your editing.
A special set of rules applies to certain topic areas, which are referred to as contentious topics. These are specially designated topics that tend to attract more persistent disruptive editing than the rest of the project and have been designated as contentious topics by the Arbitration Committee. When editing a contentious topic, Wikipedia’s norms and policies are more strictly enforced, and Wikipedia administrators have special powers in order to reduce disruption to the project.
Within contentious topics, editors should edit carefully and constructively, refrain from disrupting the encyclopedia, and:
- adhere to the purposes of Wikipedia;
- comply with all applicable policies and guidelines;
- follow editorial and behavioural best practice;
- comply with any page restrictions in force within the area of conflict; and
- refrain from gaming the system.
Additionally, you must be logged-in, have 500 edits and an account age of 30 days, and are not allowed to make more than 1 revert within 24 hours on a page within this topic.
Editors are advised to err on the side of caution if unsure whether making a particular edit is consistent with these expectations. If you have any questions about contentious topics procedures you may ask them at the arbitration clerks' noticeboard or you may learn more about this contentious topic here. You may also choose to note which contentious topics you know about by using the {{Ctopics/aware}} template.