User talk:Galla180

Welcome!

Welcome to Wikipedia, Galla180! Thank you for your contributions. I am Lingzhi and I have been editing Wikipedia for some time, so if you have any questions feel free to leave me a message on my talk page. You can also check out Wikipedia:Questions or type {{help me}} at the bottom of this page. Here are some pages that you might find helpful:

Also, when you post on talk pages you should sign your name using four tildes (~~~~); that will automatically produce your username and the date. I hope you enjoy editing here and being a Wikipedian! • Lingzhi♦(talk) 09:36, 11 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hello

Hello Lingzhi thank you for your help. Could help me understand how my edits on Real Women Have Curves could be deleted after saving multiple times from the user page? I edited the picture on the page, the infobox relating to the film, the critical response section, and the references section all on July 25, 2015. Then on July 30, I returned to the page to find that all of my edits had been deleted and the replaced by the code that the first users of the page wrote. There were no comments on the article's talk page regarding why my edits had been removed. Galla180 (talk) 23:26, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Hi. I'm busily trying to research Battle of Malvern Hill, which is currently at WP:FAC. Looking at Real Women Have Curves, you made many edits... there actually is a brief explanation of many of the other editor's reversions in the Edit summary of each reversion, which you can see in the article history, which is linked at the top of the article... do you see the words "view history" atop the "real women" article? You can click it and see a log of every edit ever made. I'm looking at you edits (which look for example like this (cur | prev) 19:41, 25 July 2015‎ Galla180 (talk | contribs)‎ . . (6,558 bytes) (-53)‎ . . (undo | thank)). You have never added an edit summary to any of your edits. As for the editor who reverted your additions, can you see things like "rv unexplained deletion of external link templates" and "rv deletion of Rotten Tomatoes and Metacritic ratings and rv non-reliable sourced review"? Those are very brief explanations of the edits that deleted your work. Here "rv" means "revert". Let's see... you changed a section header from "Critical response" to "Reviews"... you deleted some good content... you added some reviews that the other editor apparently believes are "non-reliable"... I don't know which things are non-reliable; you would have to ask that other editor, but I'm guessing that deleting IMDB and Rotten Tomatoes was a bad move.. I have no idea what "Common Sense Media" is... and so on.. You can actually click through the changes and see them one by one. Is any of this making sense? • Lingzhi ♦ (talk) 23:58, 30 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Welcome!

Hi Galla180. I work with the Wiki Education Foundation, and help support students who are editing as part of a class assignment. If there's anything I can do to help with your assignment (or, for that matter, any other aspect of Wikipedia) please feel free to drop me a note. Ian (Wiki Ed) (talk) 15:50, 13 July 2015 (UTC)[reply]