User talk:Eleonora Venezuela

Welcome!

Hi, Eleonora Venezuela. Welcome to Wikipedia! Thank you for your contributions. I hope you like the place and decide to stay. Our intro page contains a lot of helpful material for new users—please check it out! If you need help, visit Wikipedia:Questions, ask me on my talk page, or place {{helpme}} on this page, followed by your question, and someone will show up shortly to answer your questions. Auric talk 22:02, 7 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Alejndro Betancourt

Hi, Eleonora Venezuela. I've removed the unsourced information that you placed on your client's page. You continue to revert the information yet there is no RS that exists that includes this. Using his personal website is not a valid source. Sorry. Over the last few weeks I notice that several other editors have asked you not to continue to engaging in edit-warring with regard to Betancur. If you cannot provide a Reliable Source then the information will be removed. Thanks for understanding. This is not a space for public relations work. This article and the company article associated with it has been fraught with sockpuppetry and manipulation... it tests the limit of good faith to continue to do this. Thanks for understanding. 27.122.12.78 (talk) 22:57, 25 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Hello anonymous, this is the third time that you acuse me personally of been a PR, In case It was not clear the first time, the answer is NO. I ask you to please stop acusing me personally and try to do constructive editing of the article. I may not be an expert on Wikipedia, but to me constantly and systematically deleting information and references without reaching first a consensus, in my view is more vandalizing than constructive editing.--Eleonora Venezuela (talk) 15:04, 26 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eleanora, you're doing a great job. I fixed the article in order to avoid something else like a battlefield so the biographical profile should be a priority instead of the controversial profile. Wikipedia is not the right place where information is used to blame people, so all neutral information is welcome. I added the article to my watchlist as well. Greetings!--Gilwellian (talk) 21:55, 30 June 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eleonora Venezuela, you are invited to the Teahouse

Hi Eleonora Venezuela! Thanks for contributing to Wikipedia.
Be our guest at the Teahouse! The Teahouse is a friendly space where new editors can ask questions about contributing to Wikipedia and get help from peers and experienced editors. I hope to see you there! TheOriginalSoni (I'm a Teahouse host)

Visit the Teahouse

This message was delivered automatically by your robot friend, HostBot (talk) 16:09, 9 May 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Betancourt, August

Hello there! I would like to discuss your recents edits on Alejandro Betancourt López further. We appreciate your help on the page. But its important we all work to ensure Wikipedia policies are upheld. Please take a look at these Wikipedia policies:

If there is no RS, the info has to come out. Please stop reverting edits without discussion and understanding of Wiki policy first.Righteousskills (talk) 21:11, 6 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

You erased most of the article along with many RS, in what looked like reckless editing. My edits just restored the page. --Eleonora Venezuela (talk) 20:57, 7 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Eleonora, For your info and administrator response here.--Gilwellian (talk) 06:24, 11 August 2014 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mauricio García Araujo (January 4)

Your recent article submission to Articles for Creation has been reviewed! Unfortunately, it has not been accepted at this time. The reason left by Onel5969 was:

This submission's references do not adequately evidence the subject's notability—see the guidelines on the notability of people and the golden rule. Please improve the submission's referencing, so that the information is verifiable, and there is clear evidence of why the subject is notable and worthy of inclusion in an encyclopedia.
What you can do: Add citations (see Wikipedia:Referencing for beginners) to secondary reliable sources that are entirely independent of the subject.

Please check the submission for any additional comments left by the reviewer. You are encouraged to edit the submission to address the issues raised and resubmit when they have been resolved.

If you would like to continue working on the submission, go to Draft:Mauricio García Araujo and click on the "Edit" tab at the top of the window.
If you need any assistance, you can ask for help at the Articles for creation help desk or on the reviewer's talk page.
You can also get real-time chat help from experienced editors.

Onel5969 (talk) 21:06, 4 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Your submission at Articles for creation: Mauricio García Araujo has been accepted

Mauricio García Araujo, which you submitted to Articles for creation, has been created.
The article has been assessed as Start-Class, which is recorded on the article's talk page. You may like to take a look at the grading scheme to see how you can improve the article.

You are more than welcome to continue making quality contributions to Wikipedia. Note that because you are a logged-in user, you can create articles yourself, and don't have to post a request. However, you may continue submitting work to Articles for Creation if you prefer.

If you have any questions, you are welcome to ask at the help desk.
If you would like to help us improve this process, please consider leaving us some feedback.

Thank you for helping improve Wikipedia!

Onel5969 (talk) 15:20, 30 January 2015 (UTC)[reply]

Investigation

Hi, I'd like to add that you've been removed from the investigation. The editor in question has made edits to articles concerning the Venezualan oil instustry and I mistakedly pulled you name from a previous investigation that was never finished. -- CFCF 🍌 (email) 15:42, 15 August 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom elections are now open!

Hi,
You appear to be eligible to vote in the current Arbitration Committee election. The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to enact binding solutions for disputes between editors, primarily related to serious behavioural issues that the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the ability to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail. If you wish to participate, you are welcome to review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. For the Election committee, MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 17:06, 24 November 2015 (UTC)[reply]

ArbCom Elections 2016: Voting now open!

Hello, Eleonora Venezuela. Voting in the 2016 Arbitration Committee elections is open from Monday, 00:00, 21 November through Sunday, 23:59, 4 December to all unblocked users who have registered an account before Wednesday, 00:00, 28 October 2016 and have made at least 150 mainspace edits before Sunday, 00:00, 1 November 2016.

The Arbitration Committee is the panel of editors responsible for conducting the Wikipedia arbitration process. It has the authority to impose binding solutions to disputes between editors, primarily for serious conduct disputes the community has been unable to resolve. This includes the authority to impose site bans, topic bans, editing restrictions, and other measures needed to maintain our editing environment. The arbitration policy describes the Committee's roles and responsibilities in greater detail.

If you wish to participate in the 2016 election, please review the candidates' statements and submit your choices on the voting page. MediaWiki message delivery (talk) 22:08, 21 November 2016 (UTC)[reply]